this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
621 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

40559 readers
1213 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Higher Income people actually prefer the Socialist lmfao

Its somehow the poor people that get gaslighted into voting for conservatism

Ironic

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

~~I imagine the difference in the cost of living between NYC and upstate New York compensates for that? Median income alone isn't a super useful metric~~

Brain fart, disregard

[–] Fisherswamp@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Upstate NYers can't vote for mayor of NYC

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

Fuck I'm so dumb lmao

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

I think you're a little confused.

NYC = New York City

This is a Mayoral Primary Election. Every voter here is a resident of New York City

Mayor = Leader of the Executive Branch of a city.

For NY State, the Leader of the Executive Branch would be called the Governor

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 20 points 9 hours ago

imho that's what connects all the right, from finance bros to masculinists to racists : they're terrified. Of change, of difference. Of others. They're deathly afraid and it explains every action they take, every word they say.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 11 hours ago

the scariest part about tax the millionaires policies for millionaires is that we did it in massachusetts and the outcome was that it worked and raised billions for the state

[–] Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This is not specific to this post but can we please not hype the guy up too much before we see what he actually does when in office? From all the news coverage I'm getting a 'He is the Messiah! We are rescued!' vibe. He may still bend the knee to the rich once he has power.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

I think it's because its funny to see the far-right seethe

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's also just a mayor. Sure mayor of NYC but it's barely influential.

[–] Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 hours ago

We can judge him in his role as a mayor. Maybe he will get into a more powerful position later. He wouldn't be the first.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

We’re the taxpayers that want “free” health care while simultaneously paying taxes. The Right somehow thinks we’re too stupid to know we pay taxes that makes these things happen. Heck…we want people to have nice things.

Meanwhile the Right doesn’t want to pay taxes yet somehow expects to get social services like paved roads or safe drinking water. I’d mention schools or health care but the republicans clearly DGAF about those things.

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 9 hours ago

millionaires? you mean taxnonpayers?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 25 points 13 hours ago

This is very Boomers thinking everyone is still a 16 year old Millennial.

Boomer brains stuck in 1998, and it shows.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'll bet Kathy Wilde doesnt pay taxes. Also, that job description says "oligarch enabler".

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In a late 2020 interview, she described herself as "the lone defender of the billionaires at this point".[1] Pro Publica reported in 2018 that Wylde’s salary exceeded $1.1 million, which would make her among the highest paid non-profit executives in the State of New York.[2]

Jesus fucking christ.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Wylde

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 70 points 16 hours ago (19 children)

They don't believe anyone under a certain income pays taxes. "Taxpayer" just means "upper income tax bracket" in their mind.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Oddly enough, when it comes to less dense suburbs with richer people in them, the cost to the city is always more than those people pay in taxes. They pay more but they’re actually using poorer people’s taxes to pay for their shitty “neighbourhoods”, in quotes because the word implies a level of community they could only dream of.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago

Also brown people don’t pay taxes in their fantasy world. It’s just another racist dog whistle.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 154 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (14 children)

I am tired of the boomer narrative of that it's always those "young people" ruining everything. Oldest millennials are now in their mid-40's. Or even worse, the youngest gen-z people are almost 18 now. These people have been paying their taxes for years on end now.

The only terrified people in this scenario are the literal parasites who don't pay anything, through loopholes and theft

The lone defender of the billionaires at this point says everything we need to know

[–] Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

[Gen-Z] the generation loosely being defined as people born around 1997 to 2012.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 68 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"employers and taxpayers" is like "job creators".

They don't want to say "the ultra wealthy" because that would be too accurate for the owner of the site, who is an ultra wealthy person.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

It's so backwards too, since the ultra wealthy are the ones who most dodge paying their fair share of taxes.

[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 70 points 19 hours ago

nah it terrifies tax dodgers and leeches of society

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 18 hours ago

I appreciate that they say that employers don't pay taxes.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"The media" love nothing more than to find the absolute most disgusting scum in our country and interview them for their opinions...

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Outrage generates clicks, clicks generate revenue.
We're both here because we're disgusted by the headline so it obviously works.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 15 hours ago

While generally true, I think "the media" does what I mentioned in order to "manufacture consent" in cases like this. They want to create the image of what is "real" and what "people you should believe" think. God forbid you should think for yourself and agree with a spooky spooky socialist, no no we need to make you afraid of him! We need you to believe that only "freeloaders" vote for him and "real taxpayers" will be hurt by him!

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

Oh no. Anyway...

[–] AoteroaHeritage@sh.itjust.works 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

WANTED: KATHY WYLDE

For contributing to social murder, ideologically justifying excess deaths among the lower classes in order to keep the upper class hierarchy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 36 points 19 hours ago

That's an interesting way of phrasing "has actively enabled corruption for decades".

[–] AriesAspect@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Actually unreadable with the size thing and bloat

load more comments
view more: next ›