this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1030 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8241 readers
1839 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This is such a counterproductive take. It ignores why Harris actually lost (like Biden running again and refusing to step down until the end), while also implying that the Democrats didn't do anything wrong whatsoever and the fault lies with the electorate. If that's the takeaway for the DNC from this past election then we're cooked.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

70 million people looked at maga bigotry of various sorts and found it not to be a dealbreaker. Fact. They either hoped or knew Trump would hurt other people not like them, so they gave him a pass. (and that doesn't count what I believe to be the vast majority of Trump voters who were overtly OK with it.)

My intent in sharing here isn't to postmortem the election. It's a reminder of the 70 million shitty people we smile and shake hands with every day.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It also implies that Harris wouldn't attack Iran when she totally would have. A more correct approach would have been that ww3 for the Democrats is more preferable than worker rights and social institutions Bernie wanted.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

in what world do you think she would have?

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Why do you think she wouldn't? She and her party showed in recent years they will do anything Israel orders them.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

“What we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power, that is one of my highest priorities,” she added.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is a dumb narrative that leads to petty bickering while we are currently living under literal fascism. The reason they elected a fascist is because they desire change from the status quo. Pronouns are not a positive change for most people. So of course they will pick a fascist over that platform, if that's all it has to offer. The left has to get real, and I mean realpolitik. We have real solutions to offer these people. That's what the message should focus on. Inclusion is a given with leftism. DEI is corporate virtue signaling.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How is the status quo not the goal of conservatism? It's literally in the name.

Republican voters and non voters are absolutely against the changes they are seeing come from left-leaning or liberal populations. The status quo is literally to not change what already is.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Ever heard of doublespeak? Nothing in American politics means what it says on the tin. Just like how Dems are the "left." Modern right wing movement that supports Trump is populist.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

agree, the inclusion movement went too far into dictating how people should behave and cancelling people on the basis of any perceived offenses and that gave electoral leverage to the current president

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

The inclusion movement hasn't gone too far. It's been turned into a lightning rod for Dems to banter about and clutch their pearls over without actually offering any real solutions to the problems people face.

[–] tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

there was plenty of things besides pronouns that dems had to offer. like boosting new homeowners and offering incentives to new families having babies. racism and misogyny overruled it though. "i'm gonna ban all muslims and mexican are rapists!" won out.

America is looking at the proverbial mirror and realizing its full of racist, morons and people who think women can't lead; and no amount of 'well Kamala and Clinton didn't get me excited and offer me anything' will excuse that.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

I have no idea what policies you're talking about in regards to homeownership and child incentives, and I'm extremely well read on politics. So yeah, 100% that the average American doesn't either.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't support fascism buuut

Thanks for proving the point of the meme.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago

There was no but, buddy. I dare a motherfucka to ctrl+f

[–] tane@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

I don’t support fascism but we need a real plan to defeat it.

Thanks for not paraphrasing the whole post so you could make yourself seem sooooo virtuous and good by comparison. You failed miserably but you sure did try!

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

This community is cooked. The most popular response is that trans rights had fuck all to do with democrats losing, but they are all getting down voted to hell.

If we had the election again today trump would win by more votes, clearly.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago

If there's one unifying maga principle it's bigotry.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't prove a negative, but it's not like US policy towards Iran (or Israel) changes much from admin to admin. Here's Kamala right before the election saber rattling: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/08/harris-iran-greatest-adversary-trump-election.html

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

“What we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power, that is one of my highest priorities,” she added.

This is crazy... the illusion of choice? Nah we'd at least have better protections on domestic rights if she won

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Better to DIE than DEI, I guess.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 1 points 21 hours ago

Disingenuous tweet. Not like the other side was committing a genocide and normally just acts like republican lite

[–] Spazz@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 day ago

Fucking worthless Trumpers

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why do americans think this is ww3? They are not the world and I really hope they will be ok their own with this war.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Russia invading Ukraine. Israel attacking Iran. India attacking Pakistan. Nazi America threatening to annex Greenland.

Sure buddy, it's 'just' America involved here.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

All of those have been going on for, what, decades? Greenland is the only new one on the list. In no way is this a world war. Unless WW3 started in 2014?

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Hey just a reminder: NONE of the world wars started because they all got up on the same day and started shooting each other.

If you get to point and laugh a year from now about how you were right and we were wrong, be thankful for it. Right now we've got a lot of individual active armed conflicts, often overlapping with others, including the fucking Middle East (you might want to peek at some of the history there). If we don't already meet the technical criteria for a world war, we're a half a step away.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk -3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Last I checked, most people who voted for trump voted for him because they actually thought he would fix the economy. Only a fringe cares about identity politics.

While I personally believe people who voted for trump were naive at best, it is very disingenuous to pretend like they all voted for him because they hate trans people. Most normal people don't give a fuck about that shit. They just want to live and considering how chaotic the election was for the democrats, it makes sense that more people put their trust in the candidate who was there from the start.

It's a very boring answer, and it is not really an excuse for the current state of the US, but reality is often a lot duller than whatever narrative we like to cook up in our little heads after spending too much time on Twitter.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Not my fault you haven't been paying attention. Eggs were the excuse du jour at vote time. I've experienced or witnessed right wing bigotry of various sorts (not only homophobia and transphobia) for forty-five fucking years. (And I'm subtracting the years when I was too young and dumb to see it for what it was.)

It's bigotry all the way down, and no one under the age of seventy can remember a time when the Republican party stood for anything else, no matter what they claim. Look at their policies. It's all just how they are dressing it up this decade.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but not all the people who voted for trump were Republicans and it is too simplistic to say that they all voted for him because of hate towards minority groups. I'm not saying that no one voted for him because they hate x-group. Just that most people most likely voted for him because they thought he would fix the economy.

I don't think most people who voted for him expected that he was gonna go completely apeshit like he has. I sure didn't think he was gonna be this insane. And no I didn't vote for him and no I'm not American and no I can't just mind my own business because American politics is literally shoved down everybody's throat all over the world.

But I will say that acting like it was all about bigotry for every single person who voted for him is too simplistic a take, like many other people in this thread have also said.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Well, I can only go on the magas in my life. I have a lot of them, and they are all bigots, in addition to whatever other justification they claimed.

(Setting aside their ahem naivete at thinking he'd fix the economy.)

I don’t think most people who voted for him expected that he was gonna go completely apeshit like he has. I sure didn’t think he was gonna be this insane.

There's been a nonstop drumbeat of people including Trump himself telling everyone that he'd go EXACTLY this apeshit, so I don't know why.

Sure, but not all the people who voted for trump were Republicans

They all knew who Republicans were though.

[–] tane@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Your first paragraph is patently untrue the entire right wing media ecosystem is nothing but identity politics grievances and culture war bs

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 10 hours ago

That logic only works if you believe that every person who voted for trump is a bleeding heart republican who hates diversity. Objectively, that wasn't the case.

load more comments
view more: next ›