973
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 266 points 1 year ago

The constitution is about 19 pages long. Here's a pdf

[-] raynorsadjutant@reddthat.com 119 points 1 year ago

Did you read the entire thing?

[-] Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml 160 points 1 year ago

I doubt that, but OK.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Yeps. One of my electives at uni was the history of the US constitution law for non-legal majors. I had to take 2 history classes for my degree and I thought it would be an interesting subject. Not only read it also had it read to me by my professor. He was a retired JAG officer and militant ACLU supporter.

[-] CuriousLibrarian@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I guess we need to know what people consider long. The full document is longer than the Declaration of Independence , which I know a lot better. I can’t remember having to read the Constitution in school, just the preamble and a couple of amendments. This doesn’t excuse my ignorance though. Thanks for providing the whole document.

[-] FRCLYE@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Compared to most constitutions on the planet, it’s considered a short one.

[-] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 25 points 1 year ago

I think compared to most governments on the planet, the US Federal government was supposed to be a tiny one. That's why it's not supposed to be allowed to do virtually anything it does today.

The workarounds to grow the federal government are kinda like you're stuck on a desert island and all you have is coconuts, so you build your house out of coconuts, you build your car with coconuts, you build a wife with coconuts, you build your kids with coconuts, a whole society built out of coconuts. It's like "This is impressive, but what the hell made you think this was the intent of the assignment?

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

you build your wife with coconuts

I vote we skip any more discussion about how we’re going to be using coconuts on this island.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A coconut wife sounds amazing, especially if they were to start buzzing with life one day.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There are some reddit stories that I just don't need to be reminded of... 🤢

[-] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

I just looked it up and it seems that the German constitution has more than 350 pages. But the first 20 sections contain the most important and almost unchangeable foundaries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] substill@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

My five year old’s Fancy Nancy books are more than 19 pages.

[-] Jumper775@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Less words per page though, and less confusing language.

[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

True, we need to rewrite the US constitution as a kids picture book with appropriate language so that the 54% of American adults with a reading comprehension below 6th grade can keep up.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

That's a startling number. It goes far towards explaining some of the responses my comments get.

[-] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That… answers a lot of questions

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

We couldn't possibly agree on how the terminology in the original translates into plain language. We can't agree on what it means in the first place, even the most obvious plainly worded things.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not that I'm trying to refute this in any way, but why include 16 and 17 year olds in adults?

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

For a book, remarkably short.
For a news article, quite long.
For a legal document, who reads those anyways?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

19 pages isn't really a lot, , but this guy doesn't strike me as much of a reader.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm a reader. I've never read the constitution though, fiction only. I also think it's too old, can't get into the classics as much as more contemporary lit.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reading it and going over the contents is also a part of standard US high school curriculum. It's a graduation requirement. At least, it was when I graduated high school in California in the 90's.

Yeah I kind of doubt that was a real requirement then and not something your social studies teacher mandated. It’s definitely not the case now or anywhere outside of the state afaik

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We did similar in primary school in Australia. A big portion of the seventh grade is learning about the Westminster style of government, state and federal roles, and the courts. We even did our own class parliament session each week to debate and try pass different levels of law. We were able to get Grade 7s a specific hang out area at the school cafe passed based on our lower house (classroom) sittings, then our senate (Prefects and the primary school principal) passing it.

[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Constitution or clinical studies, MAGA people will take a devout view, that they read online at MAGA.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Damn, that is pretty short. I'm not American but I had always just automatically assumed it would have to be hundreds of pages. No clue why, of course, just some subconscious bias.

[-] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

If only people would respond with respectful "I doubt that, but ok".

These days, such a response is as scarce as an honest politician.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago
[-] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Let's agree to respect each other's opinion, no matter how wrong your's might be."

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my experience, the two things that seem to surprise conservatives I've talked to are: the constitution is less than 20 pages long, it's on my phone, and we could read it together in about 30 min (no takers so far), and that there are living redwood trees in California older than Jesus. I don't know why the second one surprises them so much, but it's one that seems to consistently elicit surprise.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Old trees are such a treasure. It's a shame that despite their strength they can also be fragile. My house has chestnut floors, easy to find in 1927, but then a blight wipes out 90% of the population. And not to mention us humans but we don't need to constantly talk about that, except to say it should be our goal to help these things grow for millenia.

There was a quote attributed to Lao Tzu I saw on tiktok the other day, and I was pretty damn sure it was nowhere in the Tao Te Ching, but I was curious if there was some weird translation out there I wasn't aware of.

The conversation went EXACTLY like this. Like down to the word.

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

If you look into the original sources, it gets confusing pretty quickly. There's a bunch of other sources (e.g. the zhuangzi) that assign quotes to Lao Tzu, but they're probably made up.

However, Lao Tzu probably didn't write the Tao Te Ching, so 🤷‍♂️.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laozi

Basically, by making shit up and saying Lao Tzu said it, tiktok is continuing a long Chinese tradition.

[-] guangming@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I'm confused, what was the quote talking about? Surely not the US Constitution...

[-] Mostly_Frogs@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

"Simplicity in governance is essential, just like they have in the United States Constitution. That thing is only like 19 pages long. I read the whole thing." -Lao Tzu

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Confucius say "I doubt that, but OK".

[-] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

As a machine language model, it was a pretty easy read I will say.

[-] Flemmy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

One of my favorite things to do with chat gpt is having it rewrite things as Trump. I wasn't interested in rereading the constitution a second ago, but it's going to be tremendous, you wouldn't believe how great it's going to be

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago
[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wow... So this is about to become a thing... Like beans... 😂

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I doubt that, but OK

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe if they made it a podcast chaired by a bald angry man.

[-] Sev@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

I thought this was Malcolm from Malcy in the Middle lol

[-] chatgeepeetee@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

say you havent read it without saying you havent read it.

[-] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
973 points (95.5% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3978 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS