this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
566 points (98.3% liked)

News

37032 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine used ArduPilot to help it wipe out Russian targets. It wasn’t the first time and it won’t be the last.

Open source software used by hobbyist drones powered an attack that wiped out a third of Russia’s strategic long range bombers on Sunday afternoon, in one of the most daring and technically coordinated attacks in the war.

In broad daylight on Sunday, explosions rocked air bases in Belaya, Olenya, and Ivanovo in Russia, which are hundreds of miles from Ukraine. The Security Services of Ukraine’s (SBU) Operation Spider Web was a coordinated assault on Russian targets it claimed was more than a year in the making, which was carried out using a nearly 20-year-old piece of open source drone autopilot software called ArduPilot.

ArduPilot’s original creators were in awe of the attack. “That's ArduPilot, launched from my basement 18 years ago. Crazy,” Chris Anderson said in a comment on LinkedIn below footage of the attack.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 134 points 10 months ago (36 children)

Finally found an open source project I'd be proud to contribute to.

[–] Emergency3030@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Same, how do I join?

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The shelves of your nearest hobby store hold the weapons of the future, with only a minimal cost. And that’s terrifying.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

~~terrifying~~ empowering

ftfy

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 35 points 10 months ago (7 children)

No, definitely terrifying. War should be costly and terrible. That’s the only reason it isn’t more common, that its cost is objectionable. Pax economica, while flawed, is more subjective than ever before. And I do not like that.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

War is costly and terrible, and it always will be, regardless of the magnitude of resources required to wage war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

War should be costly and terrible

and it still is and it will be

that's the point, more often that not, to take money and burn it while producing more fuel for propaganda

not saying that's whats happening in Ukraine, but this has happened a ton in the past and will continue

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, there is the whole payload aspect you need to figure out.

If you have that figured out, the rest is and has always been relatively trivial in comparison.

The trucks in the videos clearly never went through any check of the cargo. Could have had a simple trebuchet design in there and haul some explosives onto the airfield.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's something I feel like is being taken out of context. It's the getting the explosives within range of the planes that was impressive to me. They could have had mortars/rockets/etc. and probably done similar damage at that range.

I'm sure drones increase the success rate, but it wasn't drones that made that operation a success from my understanding.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The cargo area had a false ceiling didn't it? Like I saw one that looked like you could open the back of the 'trailer' but there was a fake ceiling with the drones above that.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

Afaik they had fake ceilings yeah. However noone that would bother to look, would be tricked by fake ceilings. That trick exists since horse carriages. The fake ceilings only give the driver some deniability.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

"That's ArduPilot, launched from my basement 18 years ago. Crazy,” Chris Anderson said...

One hell of an achievement to put in your resume.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Incredible. Watching the evolution of this technology is frightening.

Vietnam first televised, gulf first shown, now Ukraine i can look at the last moments of a conscripted Russian from an office chair. Insane.

Fucking world keeps it interesting. Morbidly.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Despite the name ArduPilot it appears to be based on Raspberry Pi:

https://discuss.ardupilot.org/t/ardupilot-and-blueos-for-companion-computers/134879

The hardware is built on top of this:
https://www.seeedstudio.com/Ochin-Tiny-Carrier-Board-V2-for-Raspberry-Pi-CM4-p-5887.html

Very impressive project, based on several other open source projects.
It's amazing how you can develop projects of such sophistication both cheap and fast, exclusively based on opensource. 👍😀

Imagine the time and cost it would take, if Ukraine had to build this from the bottom!
If it was an American manufacturer, it would probably be a billion dollar project.

Edit PS:
Although this seems well documented, this is probably not a beginner project.
But for a team with some previous knowledge of working with similar things, I bet it's relatively easy.

[–] TunaLobster@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It primarily runs on STM32 microcontrollers. Hardware ranges from $200 whoop quads to six figure, professional grade aircraft.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago

It supports other hardware including more "embedded" systems. I've run it on a RasPi clone and on an F4 Clone

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 10 months ago

That's wild, I was just reading about blueos for a project and that's what they used? These kids are so fucking impressive

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 10 points 10 months ago

We need more. We should all keep the effective strategies quiet and secret. That way they can be used again and again.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Open source FTW!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

An incredible a feat, and this is it’s a pretty terrifying new way to conduct warfare.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if they had to license it? lol

Ohhh sorryyyy. We would LOVE to support your attack which will be unprecedented in modern warfare… if only there wasn’t this tiny little eensy-weensy license ‘issue’. We’ve moved to a subscription for your drone warfare software. Per device. You can save 10% if you subscribe for a year. Early termination fee applies. To cancel you’ll have to call and attempt the phone labyrinth. $19.99/min.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm now imagining a scenario in which the democratic nations of the world are in a war against oligarchs with corporate armies, and the corpos losing due to their hardware having licensing issues. Like the corpos are so addicted to fucking people over they can't help but fuck their allies over.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I doubt there's many commercial options for drone swarm plane destruction. Who is this for?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Well drone strike would make quite a fun game too

load more comments
view more: next ›