this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
651 points (98.2% liked)

News

29397 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Rips, slams, shreds, incinerates... I'm sick of these headlines.

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously, it's just right-wing exploitative language. And yet, it's the same left-leaning outlets repeating it again and again.

I wish there were more bold takedowns and real accountability, but it's all so watered down now. Less like a pile driver and more like a sternly worded memo.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It also serves to dismantle and pacify any possibility of actual opposition growing a pair. When just saying something is "ripping" someone, it has the effect of making it seem like something that is actually effective is being done. When the cult does it, it works for them because it is intended to build cults of ideology that oppose reality by appealing to egos, but they also call for their base to mobilize in ways that are effective. Here, people and politicians just don't want to face doing what would be effective, so they just add stronger language for their usual fallback.

Imagine if the American revolution had been about people just waiting for the British parliament and King George III to roll over with peaceful protests while they waited. The side with the gullible personality cult is the one getting mobilized and radicalized while the opposition is pacified with the illusion that due process will suddenly materialize again and that everyone will acknowledge how right they were.

All these headlines make the relative pacifism that is happening seem like activism that is being effective. People need to realize how bad things are going to feel bad enough to do something about it, not be told that just pointing out "that's bad!" is ripping anyone a new one just because it comes from another mouthpiece. There's nothing wrong with the news getting out or pointing out how bad it is, it's the language that suggests that more is being done against it than actually is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dr_Demented9885@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

They pulled the sneaky crap all the time especially whenever they get themselves raises. It’s always done at like two or 3 o’clock in the morning on some bill that gets past.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago

I’m surprised there’s no “slammed” community on the fediverse that just focuses on instances of “slamming” mentioned in the media.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 days ago

Since 2015 or so....

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 days ago (32 children)

I understand the issue. It's clear. What I don't understand is this article focusing on Ocasio-Cortez's "by the light of day" comment.

Are people watching these proceedings live on C-Span with their hand on the phone ready to call their congressperson's office? If Republicans pushed this through "during the light of day," would it make any actual difference? Why can't congresspersons challenge this in the middle of the night? Does Ocasio-Cortez think Republican constituents will be making those calls to change the minds of their politicians? 🤔

If Republicans pushed this through “during the light of day,” would it make any actual difference

Yes, actually. The propaganda machine usually needs a minute to spin up and align talking points. Pushing things through at midnight gives them the ability to carefully prepare the first round of headlines and social media posts for when Americans wake up.

First impressions are by far the most important in propaganda.

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›