Eggyhead

They’re holding out until they can add another Republican to cancel out the release of the Epstein files.

Well at least he would have been okay with it.

Then it seems that Nintendo is also in the extreme minority by claiming this guy’s efforts have done them any harm. How they won this is beyond me.

Nintendo’s asinine anti-consumer anti-piracy measures are probably causing more harm to the company than this guy ever did.

I might have actually bought a Switch 2 if Nintendo hadn’t pissed me off with their pricing and game cart shenanigans.

The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.

They never specified who’s security…

But it’s not hard to find examples of similar games that don’t reach server-crashing levels of popularity. Axiom Verge, for one. Beautiful art, runs on anything, affordable, no modern fuckery. It’s also a metroidvania. Not to imply it’s a better game, but I personally enjoyed it way more than Hollow Knight.

I think I’m reaching the end of the Coda’s plot, and I assume it might have something to do with what goes on in Horizon, so I feel a bit obligated to push through it to see what the end beholds. There are tons of unlockables, side stories, challenges, and dialogues to be had between everyone in the meantime.

I’m in the coda of Reverie. I rolled the credits some time ago, but the story, dungeons, and challenges just keep showing up. I’m approaching level 180 now and still have a lot to do.

I purchased Daybreak a few hours ago because it’s getting to be about time to have the next game ready and it’s 30% off on PSN.

Here’s hoping for a PSVR2 mode.

I sometimes approach this like I do with students. Using your example, I’d ask it to restate the source, then ask it to read the title of that source directly. If it’s correct, I might ask it to briefly summarize what the source article covers. Then I would ask it to restate what it told me about the source earlier, and to explain where the inconsistency lies. Usually by this time, the AI is accurately pointing out flaws in its prior logic. At that point I ask again if it is 100% sure it didn’t make a mistake, and it might actually concede to having been wrong. Then I tell it to remember how and why it was wrong to avoid similar errors in the future. I don’t know if it actually works, but it makes me feel better about it.

I’m more inclined to believe it’s gotten better at being convincing.