this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
988 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23388 readers
4700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Siresly@lemm.ee 21 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not just the poorest and not just children.

Not just Musk. https://bdsmovement.net/microsoft

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

Elon is a Nazi

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Bill gates is always spending his money eradicating diseases. Maybe he can eradicate this musk disease too

[–] internetistrash@lemmy.world 50 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I cannot be the only one here who sees tiny hands.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago

Fuck, I can't unsee it now.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 65 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

I got downvoted on Lemmy the other day because I said that I prefer Bill Gates to Musk.

Maybe there are things about Gates I don't know. Maybe he is actually quite an evil person; I don't know. But he does at least spend billions of dollars helping vulnerable people, right? And Bill's stances on global politics are far more sensible than those of Musk.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 42 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

There are no good billionaires. But I must agree that Bill Gates cannot be compared to Elon Musk. Bill has done evil, but his evil doesn't compare to what Elon Musk is doing right now

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's a silly to waste one's time struggling over deciding which one is worse. They're both billionaires who spend hundreds of millions of dollars undermining the public interest. Gates just cares more about his PR than Musk.

[–] el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I get what you're saying 100%, but it's really not a struggle to decide which one is worse.

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The massive cock slobbering that Warren Buffet got at his Woodstock of Capitalism last week was nauseating. All the media were fawning over how he’s still a small-town Nebraska bumpkin. I have to hand it to him he crafted his image perfectly as a “good billionaire” too.

[–] GenerationII@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Oh but I heard he lives in a humble little house in Omaha!

"Humble Little House in Omaha"----->

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago

They're tone deaf. Comparatively that property IS humble in the world of billionaires. But that ain't no roach infested bachelor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 hours ago

He absolutely can be compared to Musk -- he's better than musk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nuance is lost on a lot of people on here. All billionaires bad therefore no billionaire is preferred. While I agree there's no good billionaire there's a spectrum of bad. Like would I rather break my pelvis or break my legs? Both are bad but one is preferable.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

None are preferrable. Nobody should have that much wealth, power, and influence.

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for proving my point.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

That nuance is not important - it's not worth wasting your breath on. If people focused on root causes of the dysfunction and the change needed to solve the issues plaguing our societies - we'd be much better off.

The nuance isn't lost to me, I just don't care to quantify it and then shout it out to the heavens. It makes no difference to me whether Elon Musk is worse than Bill Gates. They can duke that battle out themselves if they care to.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

None are preferable.

Yes, that is accepted.

But, given the reality that billionaires do exist, one that spends his money curing diseases is less bad than one who is closing hospitals serving war round populations or actively starving people.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I think making value judgements on individuals is a counterproductive use of our time, energy, and voice. That's what I'm trying to point out.

If we focused on root causes and the change we'd like to see to solve those problems, we'd be smooth sailing as a world already.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›