this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)

news

24738 readers
706 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 52 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Firms are just passing the additional cost of tariffs onto consumers rather than eating it and incurring an additional financial burden to reshore all their manufacturing?

What a fucking surprise

[–] edge@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

At some point the drop in sales from the increased prices would pretty much require them to move manufacturing back. We'll see if Trump increases tariffs further to try to cause that.

But yeah, there's a pretty big hurdle of actually needing to rebuild the manufacturing base in the US that we abandoned decades ago.

Of course the quickest way to do such a thing would be massive government investments (and central planning would be even better). It's funny how the "communist" policies they hate would actually achieve Trump's stated goals much quicker and more efficiently than the free market could.

But it highlights Trump's inconsistent ideology. Aggressive protectionism ("big government") to bring manufacturing back, but domestically leaving it up to the free market to actually do so, because "big government bad".

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The issue at that point is that onshoring would be a decade-plus long project. Why commit to that when Trump changes his mind every twenty minutes?

[–] edge@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It depends on how far Trump is willing to go. If he imposes 10000% tariffs or something and no one can afford to buy their products at all, their choice will be to shut down, abandon the American market (their largest market and where they are based out of), or onshore.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 11 months ago

No. You're not thinking clearly. It's not just a choice. It's not just spending money. The machines to run the factories will need to be imported because we don't make them here. That means the cost of building a factory gets higher and higher as the tarrifs go higher and higher. That's a contradiction they can't easily escape from. But further, they couldn't get a factory with imported machines built in under 2 years, so it's easier for them to business putsch than it is reshore.

If they decide to build everything from scratch in the US, it would take a decade, and the raw materials would have to be imported.

No amount of Trump's arbitrary and capricious action can make this happen.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is another secret option

Go bankrupt and let the consumers eat shit

[–] edge@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I'm dumb and didn't read your comment properly

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

AFAIK 100% is already effectively cutting off all trade, anything past this won't make a difference; it's why China stopped raising theirs. Shipments have already entirely ceased.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

These are hardly "American" companies, but global corps at this point. I'd expect them to move their operations to Ireland or Panama or something and abandon the unstable US market that way.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

There is no reason for them to risk the capital if/when the tariffs are reverted in 3.5 years. The only way US could reindustrialize is with a long term (20 to 50 years) plan which provides funding and certain guarantees to the businesses who would have to do it. Or nationalize the industries and do it that way, like all the socialist countries do

[–] Bloobish@hexbear.net 51 points 11 months ago (3 children)

shocked-pikachu

For real though are there any actual companies rushing to start manufacturing in the US given how unstable it is politically and economically?

[–] jack@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You'll probably see factories that are already functional add a shift or get some new machines to invest domestic production. Wholly new production? I doubt it.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, you really won't.

The workforce just doesn't fucking exist. Factory labor struggles to recruit as it is. Half the existing workforce is made up of immigrants, and that's a conservative estimate.

As the supply chain starts breaking down it won't matter anyway, because even with increased demand for American made products, the difficulty we'll face in basic maintenance because most of what is used is imported is going to become a massive bottleneck.

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Half the existing workforce is made up of immigrants, and that's a conservative estimate

Not to mention Trump is also enacting anti-immigrant policies making it even less attractive for immigrants to come in and be part of the workforce that the ruling class desperately needs. This is why I've always been saying Trump doesn't understand capitalism/imperialism.

Whether intentional or not, we are heading for a re-proletarianization of the labour aristocracy

[–] jack@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

Whether intentional or not, we are heading for a re-proletarianization of the labour aristocracy

Good tbh, that's communist party time

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is, and has been, already happening, regardless of the tariffs. The biggest difference is that now local manufacturing will be able to raise prices on domestic goods because the overall competitive market price has gone up. Fun stuff!

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

The majority of Mattel's factories have been moved to Mexico and the US a while ago, a little bit before Trumps IIRC (the one that stayed were the one where local government gave tax incentive to stay because of the economical contributions). North American jobs are mostly office work which haven't really moved.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 11 months ago

I can't imagine any rational investor putting money into manufacturing in US in the current conditions.

[–] CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Probably very few because most companies still source inputs from China so they either need to start pricing in higher input costs or decrease production while they hold off on orders hoping the tariffs are rolled back. Since this impacts basically everything, the inflation will hurt demand, so companies raising prices will also have difficulty selling, and not just because their own product's price went up.

This is basically a stagflation self-own.

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Mattel took 5 years to evaluate (financial and logistics) if one of their manufacturing plants should move from North America to Mexico and China and it took an additional 2 years to move everything to the 2 countries.

Do people really think that Corpoes are not going to brace the impact when you have a president who changes his mind every 2 seconds?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

and is at least nominally term-limited out in just over 3 and a half years

[–] miz@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Met him in real life when I used to work at Mattel, dude is an ex-idf sniper.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

kombucha-disgust

may justice catch up with him

[–] homhom9000@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think we can trick trump to start sanctioning ceos who keep manufacturing overseas. Then we can sit back and watch them fight

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe that was JDPON Don's plan the entire time. He knew the CEO's wouldn't move manufacturing back to the US

[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago
[–] Lucien@mander.xyz 12 points 11 months ago
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

MATTEL ELECTRONICS PRESENTS:

B-52 BOMBERRR

[–] lurker_supreme@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

Trump is trying to create American manufacturing? What a load of bullshit! The US is about as productive as my colon after I tried out that all meat diet. Are the factories just gonna spring out of the clear blue sky?What were they THINKING? avgn-horror