this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
591 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23422 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 212 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Including Cory Booker... 🤷‍♂️ 🙄

Was everything he did recently just as performative as with MAGAts??

Way to put up roadblocks and speedbumps when it really counts Dems... Feckless Fucks. 🖕 🖕

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No shit it was. He wants to run for president and he knows that stunt will make headlines but this will be buried in comments where the headline is “16 democrats vote for trump nominee” (aka exactly what is happening here)

Booker is classic neoliberal, no ethics or morals, guided by money and power. 10-15 years ago he was deeply in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry because they are huge in NJ. Then his aspirations went higher and he realized that association was harmful, at that point he had connections that made him no longer reliant on their cash, so he shed them. It’s not growth, it’s a calculated move

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

I had hoped he was going for redemption. Feckless moron doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of being president

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] waylandyr@lemm.ee 71 points 1 week ago

Of course it was performative, it all is.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago

Of course it was. It was just a political stunt to pump up his street cred as a warrior, in advance of an eventual announcement for a presidential campaign.

Then he votes for the MAGA Nazis.

He's a collaborator.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

This time it'll be different. You'll see.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] immutable@lemm.ee 187 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can you fight them as hard as they fought you

Nope

Filibuster maybe?

Only when there’s nothing pending

Procedural moves that slow them down

Nah

Could you at least not vote to enable them

Votes to enable them silently with intense eye contact

What the fuck can you do?

Pulls out phone, texts you for $20 for their battle fund

Jesus fucking christ

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 123 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Cory Booker—New Jersey

Chris Coons—Delaware

Tammy Duckworth—Illinois

John Fetterman—Pennsylvania

Ruben Gallego—Arizona

Maggie Hassan—New Hampshire

Tim Kaine—Virginia

Andy Kim—New Jersey

Angus King—Maine (independent who caucuses with Democrats)

Amy Klobuchar—Minnesota

Gary Peters—Michigan

Jack Reed—Rhode Island

Jacky Rosen—Nevada

Jeanne Shaheen—New Hampshire

Elissa Slotkin—Michigan

Mark Warner—Virginia

shamelessly copied off the article

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

We're still counting fetterman as a Democrat? Aight.

Also wasn't everyone fawning over Booker for the sit in DAYS AGO??

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard that apparently (rumors) Fetterman might run in 2028 to give the illusion that we still have a democracy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Primary every one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I keep hearing project 2025 was a decades plan and the Dems had nothing planned to counter it. Now I'm guessing they are part of the plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not like the guy they voted for is a rare qualified pick from the Trump camp.

It’s David Purdue, a failed pillow company CEO, as well as ceo for other textile companies. More recently he dabbled in politics as a Republican senator from Georgia, failed gubernatorial candidate, 2020 election denier, climate change denier, and generally an idiotic sycophant.
The textile experience gives him a small amount of plausibility as a choice, but everything else far outweighs that. Just another loser grifter in Trump’s orbit.

[–] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

God damn, how many more failed pillow company execs does he have left?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You DONT Understand! They COULDNT do ANYTHING except Vote to Confirm because they NEED Donations!

[–] DrabPoultry@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago

Donate harder and maybe they'll consider doing something!

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 39 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Bourgeois party. Capitalism is incompatible with democracy.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The dnc is a sunk cost.

You want a country where you can live free, you're going to have to take it yourself.

Dont worry though, that will be some other generations problem. Most of us will just have to live through the enshitification of everything. Cherish these last days. You may never see any like them again. You might even wake up one day and think, the status quo was like being stuck at the top of a Farris wheel. Scary, and uncertain but the view was amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Democrats never actually opposed fascism, they just invoked it because they knew it was unpopular. The problem of the Democrats is that you can't constantly run on things you have no intention of following through on, without having voters stop believing you eventually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Alright at this point we should just clean house everyone in executive, Congress and Judiciary needs to go

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anybody really know politics in detail and can explain their motive?

Are they afraid of retaliation in some form? What's the rub?

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

They are republicans in disguise..

[–] indulgence@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

One day people are going to realize this is just theatre. It's a club with predetermined decisions, similar to WWE. None of them give a fuck about you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Controlled opposition party strikes again!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 21 points 1 week ago (21 children)

But if we vote/advocate third parties, or converse in conservative spaces or .ML, .Lemmygrad*, on Lemmy, we're trolls or shills. 🤮

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is the time for third parties. I get why people were saying not to talk about them during the election but now is the time because it’s obvious that the Dems continue to not have a spine.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It was obvious every election cycle since FDR too. It's past time for us to stop crossing oceans and moving mountains for those who won't jump a puddle or molehill for us. Politicians, I mean. I'll still cast my vote to help the "sane liberals", conservatives, and marxists who would let me starve in the streets or drop dead in the fields while harvesting their food, or in their bathroom I may be cleaning at the time.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Not committing self harm isn't equivalent to Moving Mountains etc. This is the whole problem with that standpoint. Yes the genocides that the United States Russia and China are committing are inexcusable. They were also not actually on the ballot. There was no one who stood a chance of getting elected that was going to make those better. But there was one that vowed to make things worse. And they won. Like many of us said they would. There is no single one group that deserves credit for that victory. But the margin of votes was with in single digit percentage. It wasn't moving a mountain.

I'm not here to accuse you of being happy with the outcome. But can you admit that you might have been taken advantage of. That your sincere Ernest desire to see things fixed may have been manipulated and taken advantage of to your own detriment and the determent of people you care about. Because I can tell you 100% that fascists, leninists, and other groups absolutely we're stirring the pot. Not caring about who got hurt.

I have no problem with anyone talking to them and trying to de program any of those groups. What I do have a problem with, are people repeating propaganda and being manipulated by these groups to get everyone hurt. We are here.

As an anarchist I wish to see all national parties disbanded and abolished. Democrat, republican, green, libertarian, vanguard. And you're not wrong that a lot of this has been going on since and including FDR. He should have actually tried and hung everyone found guilty of being involved with the business plot. Instead of making backroom deals to get Social Security Etc passed. Something which the people he spared set about immediately after it's passage, gutting it.

The sad thing is, that Democrats deny their role in the failure, just as many of the so-called people on the left who spent so much time attacking them. But as they say success has many fathers, while failure is a bastard.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Imagine being a liberal right now lmfao You’re pissed at EVERYTHING and yelling at your allies while the people you’re telling them to vote for are supporting the very thing making you furious.

Fuckin’ awesome.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (33 children)

I get it. I too want this entire administration to burn, but at the same time, Perdue was a sitting Senator. A co-worker. Almost normal compared to Bondi or RFK Jr.

And this isn't a cabinet member. It's not like Perdue is going to make any real progress with China on anything.

China isn't budging on shit.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Sorry yall. It was Fetterman or Oz and we fucking ended up with both.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO!!!!!

jfc.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago

Traitors to america

load more comments
view more: next ›