But… I’m confused. Didn’t Musk call empathy a weakness? Surely someone so tolerant, inclusive, and humble couldn’t be wrong.
Today I Learned
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
People like musk are afraid of heroes
Fucking hell. I can't escape being reminded of this shitstain everywhere, even if I filter political posts.
A parasite keeps reminding you it’s there until it (or you) is destroyed.
Yeah I wish we could filter comments as well.
programming.dev##article.comment-node:has(div.comment-content:has(p:has-text(/Musk/i)))
Put that into your adblocker custom filters (assuming you're using a browser)
Paul Bloom has written an entire book arguing Against Empathy
I'm not sure I entirely agree with his thesis but it's not a completely outrageous idea. I often wish I could tone down my level of empathy as well.
Reading the page, it doesn't sound like he's against empathy at all. He's specifically against making decisions based on "feels" and targeting empathy specifically because he seems to believe it's a tool often misused.
For a second I was expecting something akin to Radical Candor's "ruinous empathy" which has been used an excuse by managers the world over to justify their inherent lack of any empathy for the people around them.
Seems like an interesting read, adding it to my list. Thanks.
I got caught up on the term 'empathy for self.' I haven't read the book, but I visited the link and couldn't get past what I felt was a tragically flawed oxymoron. But maybe that's a flaw with the Wikipedia article and not the source material, so I'll endeavor to seek out the book at some point to learn more.
Empathy being a sign of privilege isn't the truth I needed to read today :/
In a weird way, having emotionally available and supportive parents is absolutely a privilege. People are able to develop empathy in spite of bad parents, and good parenting isn't a guarantee to a good person, but parenting is a major factor for life success. I wish it weren't, and I hope we can build a society that could guarantee every child full opportunities.
When you are fighting to survive, it's only normal to have less bandwidth to care for others.
The opposite I feel, we are stronger as a group and my instinct when shit hits the fan is to make sure everyone involved is ok and ready to face the challenge together
That's the irony of it. I'm by no means a scholar of Thich Nhat Hanh, but I remember reading an account from his early life as a Vietnamese monk during the conflict with imperial France in which he had basically nothing and was himself barely surviving, but still found a way to feel peace and express compassion for a young French soldier suffering from malaria who desperately raided the monastery at gunpoint.
Luckily, it is the kind of privilege you can pass on to your children.
You don't have to have any other privileges for that. Just patience and love (yep, not easy, but doable by all means)
You can break the cycle
How is it privilege?
My parents were fucking great. Not the best but damn it they did the best they could with what they were handed. I can see how it could be considered a privilege.
Not everyone has good parents
People are terrified of empathy. Empathy is the capacity (or even the obligation) to experience the suffering of others. Suffering HURTS. Empathy HURTS. People will do anything to avoid thinking about the victim on their plate.
Aversion of pain is a pretty powerful deterrent. I guess there may need to be a critical mass of empathic individuals in a community to tip the scale in favor of everyone being more empathic and feeling generally better for it. Misery shared and understood amongst peers seems to always feel better than misery in solitude.
A history of trauma is more common among people who refuse to harm animals on the basis of empathy (as opposed to being plant based for their health or the environment or something) than among the general population. I suspect that empathy is innate. I suspect that people who have experienced trauma have less capacity to ignore, interfere with, and override their empathy.
But isn't this argument exactly what the book above is saying is false in their findings? Rescuers tended to have better relationships with their parents and given less traumatic punishments.
I suppose you could be referring to non-familial or non-violent traumas. In any case though, this would be sympathy rather than empathy. Those people are less likely to traumatize or otherwise harm a creature because they sympathize due to their personal trauma
The text does not speak of trauma. Trauma is not "bad things that happen to you," it is "things that happen to you that break you." Two people might have the same experience. One receives life-long trauma and one receives a valuable lesson. You might expect people who have been beaten by their parents to be more likely to bear trauma, but this text doesn't make that claim. You'd have to call on something else.
This text appears to me to be saying that children who witness their parents suppressing their empathy (such as they must to inflict physical pain) are more likely to do the same.
Ripley discusses trauma early in the book and there appears to be some correlation between the size of a person's hippocampus and their capacity to absorb and rebound from traumatic events.
It makes perfect sense to me that people who suffer abuse or neglect when young would develop a deep-rooted drive to look out for themselves first and foremost. It would be (literally, socially, and emotionally) a survival mechanism. Unfortunately, it would leave less room than others might have for empathy.
I don't imagine this would ever go away completely, even if their situation improved by adulthood.
I think there's also a sort of autodidactic type of learning empathy, even if your parents don't teach it to you.
I think it's — at least for a part of the population — a very natural thing and would have to be actively discouraged as a kid to make it go away.
Although idk I did read a ton so maybe the books raised me idk
Reading books are known to increase empathy, as the very act itself forces you to see the world from someone else's perspective, putting yourself in someone else's shoes every time you open a new book.
Reading fiction teaches empathy, even if you don’t have it naturally or your parents are shit humans. There’s something about the way a novel puts you in the back seat of someone’s mind, the cliche “walk a mile in someone else’s shoes.”
Which is why it’s concerning that:
Many adults don’t read a book after high school. Many high schools don’t even assign books anymore - just passages, because that’s what on the ACT.
Our shitty education system makes kids associate reading a book with homework, and many adults don't outgrow that association
Many kids in the US weren’t even taught phonics.
Teachers were forced to use an expensive curriculum program that didn’t work - and similar shit had been proven not to work in the 70’s. For lots of children, reading is too difficult to be enjoyable because they don’t know phonics.
fwiw, I didn't read 0-17 for fun because reading was homework and fuck doing what you tell me.
I started reading in my 20s. Hopefully others too.
It's called trauma.
There's some truth here, like poorly-treated children probably have difficulty with empathy, except I've known a few people that had very hard childhoods and are some of the kindest people I've ever met, as if they developed past those issues to understand how important empathy is.
I also come from a large family, and while my siblings and my cousins had very similar upbringings, the variability in things like empathy and justice is extensive even among siblings (notably including twins).
To me it seems like there's a strong element of innate character trait with this stuff, as we've watched kids grow up and seen their character at 2 years old remain consistent into adulthood. If this stuff were driven mostly by environment, then at least most kids would be similar... And we've found they aren't, it's all over the map, unpredictable by the environment.
Not to say environment doesn't/can't influence, it certainly can, but I don't believe it's usually the primary driver, just in cases where the environment is notably negative
Some people when faced with struggle become cold and bitter: "If I got through it without help, so can they."
Some people do the opposite : "That was a hell I suffered through that I don't want anyone else to have to experience"
And I have spent my entire life trying to figure out the difference between those two kinds of people and wondering which type I truly am.
There very well could be something innate. Later in the chapter, Ripley writes about heroes who did what they did because they felt they wouldn't have been able to live with the sense of cowardice for not acting. The fear of future self loathing overpowered their fear of present peril.
As for nurture vs. nature origins of empathy, I'm looking forward to watching Boarding On Insanity.
This book is fantastic as a whole. Highly recommend.
I had asshole impatient parents (two of them), and I was like that. After I moved out, I had to learn empathy.
Ive been in a few emergency situations at- and outside-of work, and I'm always told that I'm a great leader who is calm and quick to act effectively.
My point is that empathy and leadership isnt dependent on parents.
Not entirely, and you did a great job of overcoming that. But learning empathy and really anything is easiest as a child and the parents are the best avenue for that.
What kinds of things did you consciousnessly and intentionally do to train yourself into a healthier and more empathic frame of mind? Did you naturally gravitate toward a vocation requiring calm decisiveness under pressure in dynamic and unpredictable situations?
I can't say it was intentional. I never set out to become more empathetic. It was just that, as I began to navigate the world on my own, I realized how selfish and wrong was my thinking about the world and the people i met.
I learned that eating animals was a major cause of the climate catastrophe shortly after moving from my patents house, and so I became vegetarian and many of my friends were vegan. My initial motivation for this was mostly still selfish, since its still in my personal interest to avoid climate catastrophe. But obviously many of my peers were veg for more empathetic reasons.
Also at Uni many of my friends were poorer than me. So being exposed to poor vegan friends showed me a lot of what I wasn't taught by my parents (empathy).
And then I went traveling, and I was amazed at how kind most strangers I met were. We're taught to live in fear and that others want to hurt us, but I found most strangers wanted to help. And those who have less generally give more than rich folks.
As for work, I've worked as a sysadmin. It can be high stress when things break and you're called-in to fix it. Its important to have a cool head. I've also done a lot of trekking, sometimes in sketchy situation. I think the leader attribute might be more my nature, whereas empathy was learned (or, maybe, being a selfish asshole was unlearned)