this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
66 points (97.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31208 readers
1603 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oleds look great, but I'm severely allergic to the concept of burn in. Not interested in technology that has such a comparatively short life span, and don't want to think about auto hiding UI elements either.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

Modern ones have anti-burn in stuff so when it detects fixed elements it turns these down in intensity. For what it's worth mine is going on 4 years regularly playing a game with fixed UI and no issues so far touches wood.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

I have an LG OLED from ~2016 or so. Burnt, especially green. I kept it pretty even for wear, until I uh..I was playing Mario 64 ROM hacks, went to sev for a Slurpee and forgot to turn the TV off. Luigi's hat burnt into the screen in his sleeping idle animation and that was that. Took less than half an hour at that point, the panel was already worn out by then for that to happen. Now it's the workout room TV. Yeah it was very pretty, especially useful for 4K CRT Royale retro shaders. Not worth the price unless you got ample cash to burn as I consider these panels disposable.

I went with LCD again after that. MicroLED 75" with local dimming. It's fine, good enough. You see the dimming zones while web browsing text heavy dark themed websites like this one, but it's not a deal breaker for me.

Personally I wouldn't buy another until local dimming zones are way way more numerous and smaller on cheaper models. 1000 nits is enough, uncomfortablly bright sometimes now with HDR on. 120hz VRR is great, don't need more. Don't care about 8K. Or I guess if OLED became impossible to burn, or take so long I wouldn't care. At least a decade, without having to mitigate the issue by hiding task bars or using lower brightness etc.

I don't want to worry about it.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My WOLED monitor vs my old main.

It's amazing. With my black theme, a black background, and the mouse off the monitor, you can't even tell the thing is on.

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Goddamn, you just sold me.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Be careful though, with the contrast between my old ips and my new monitor, all it took was a best buy gift card bonus for Christmas for me to justify an open box return for a second one.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's amazing. With my black theme, a black background, and the mouse off the monitor, you can't even tell the thing is on.

I have a solid black color as background and a hidden task bar on my OLED monitor.

It's just a mouse cursor floating in nothingness.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I just don't understand why I find it so cool that the only lights that are on are the lights giving you information.

I'm glad there are other people like you stop and appreciate it!

[–] tal@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It does matter, but there are drawbacks and advantages each way.

My current monitor is LCD. When I bought it, that was because OLED prices were significantly higher.

I like the look of the inky blacks on OLEDs. I really love using the things in the dark.

If you're using a portable device, OLED can save a fair bit of power if you tend to have darker pixels on the screen, since OLED power consumption varies more-significantly based on what's onscreen. I use dark mode interfaces, so I'm generally better-off from a pure power consumption standpoint with OLED.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_CRT,_LCD,_plasma,_and_OLED_displays

OLED displays use 40% of the power of an LCD displaying an image that is primarily black as they lack the need for a backlight,[35] while OLED can use more than three times as much power to display a mostly white image compared to an LCD.

OLEDs are more prone to burn-in than LCDs, but my understanding is that newer OLEDs have significantly improved on this. And it takes a long time for that to happen.

Aside from price, I'd mostly come down on the side of OLED. However, there is one significant issue that I was not aware of at the time I was picking a monitor that I think people should be aware of. As far as I can tell from what I've read, present-day OLED displays have controllers that don't deal well with VRR (variable refresh rate, like Freesync or Gsync). That is, if you're using VRR on your OLED monitor and the frame rate is shifting around, you will see some level of brightness fluctuation. For people who don't make use of VRR, that may not matter. I don't really care about VRR in video games, but I do care about it to get precise frame timings when watching movies, so I'd rather, all else held equal, have a monitor that doesn't have VRR issues, since I have VRR enabled. If I didn't care about that, I'd probably just turn VRR off and not worry about it.

EDIT:

https://www.displayninja.com/what-is-vrr-brightness-flickering/

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This was a great comment! Where does QLED fit into all of this?

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

No brightness issues here with LG QLED.

There's of course the limitations of VRR itself and the implementation. Freesync only works within a frame rate range.

I've seen strobe/flicker when it's too low.

I cap my GPU to 108FPS to prevent tearing, I leave VRR always on.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

I've never really wanted to get a QLED monitor, so I haven't spent time looking at their VRR behavior; sorry. I imagine that there's material out there about it, though.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It does matter. But all my big displays are still LCD, because of cost.

It's about blackpoint. With an LED, pixels which are black still have a backlight. This makes them a kind of grey.

With OLED, the pixels themselves emit light. This means that black pixels are unlit.

The difference is obvious in a dimly lit room looking at dark content.

That said, while I would love OLEDs all around, they're expensive. I'm willing to give up having true blacks for the cost difference. It may be different as costs on OLED come down.

I do have an OLED phone, because Samsung is pumping out OLEDs on everything.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

OLED also matters more on phones because such a large fraction of their power use goes to the display (apparently up to 80% at max brightness on a task that doesn't require much computing power). A desktop would need one hell of a multi-monitor setup to get remotely close, plus you aren't as concerned about power usage when there's no battery to deplete.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Reposting from my comment in the past. TLDR: I took the plunge on OLED TV in 2021 as a primary monitor and it's been incredible

I've been using an LG C1 48" OLED TV as my sole monitor for my full-time job, my photography, and gaming since the start of 2021. I think it's at around ~~3000~~ 4500 hours of screen time. It averages over 10 hours of on time per weekday

It typically stays around 40 brightness because that's all I need, being fairly close to my face the size. All of the burn-in protection features are on (auto dimming , burn-in protection, pixel rotation) but I have Windows set to never sleep for work reasons.

Burn in has not been a thing. Sometimes, I leave it on with a spreadsheet open or a photo being edited overnight because I'm dumb. High brightness and high contrast areas might leave a spot visible in certain greys but by then, the TV will ask me to "refresh pixels" and it'll be gone when I next turn the TV on. The task bar has not burned in.

Experience for work, reading, dev: 8/10

Pros: screen real estate. One 48" monitor is roughly four 1080p 22" monitors tiled.The ergonomics are great. Text readability is very good especially in dark mode.

cons: sharing my full screen is annoying to others because it's so big. Video camera has to be placed a bit higher than ideal so I'm at a slightly too high angle for video conferences.

This is categorically a better working monitor than my previous cheap dual 4k setup but text sharpness is not as good as a high end LCD with retina-like density because 1) the density and 2) the subpixel configuration on OLED is not as good for text rendering. This has never been an issue for my working life.

Experience with photo and video editing: 10/10

Outside of dedicated professional monitors which are extremely expensive, there is no better option for color reproduction and contrast. From what I've seen in the consumer sector, maybe Apple monitors are at this level but the price is 4 or 5x.

Gaming: 10/10

2160p120hz HDR with 3ms lag, perfect contrast and extremely good color reproduction.

FPSs feel really good. Anything dark/horror pops A lot of real estate for RTSs Maybe flight sim would have benefited from dusk monitor setup?

I've never had anything but a good gaming experience. I did have a 144hz monitor before and going to 120 IS marginally noticable for me but I don't think it's detrimental at the level I play (suck)

Reviewers had mentioned that it's good for consoles too though I never bothered

Movies and TV: 10/10 4K HDR is better than theaters' picture quality in a dark room. Everything I've thrown on it has been great.

Final notes/recommendations This is my third LG OLED and I've seen the picture quality dramatically increase over the years. Burn-in used to be a real issue and grays were trashed on my first OLED after about 1000 hours.

~~Unfortunately, I have to turn the TV on from the remote every time. It does automatically turn off from no signal after the computers screen sleep timer, which is a good feature~~. There are open source programs which get around this. Bazzite and Mac seems to handle this too.

This TV has never been connected to the Internet... I've learned my lesson with previous LG TVs. They spy, they get ads, they have horrendous privacy policies, and they have updates which kill performance or features... Just don't. Get a streaming box.

You need space for it, width and depth wise. The price is high (~~around 1k USD on sale~~ prices are even lower now) but not compared with gaming monitors and especially compared with 2 gaming monitors.

Pixel rotation is noticeable when the entire screen shifts over a pixel two. It also will mess with you if you have reference pixels at the edge of the screen. This can be turned off.

Burn in protection is also noticable on mostly static images. I wiggle my window if it gets in my way. This can also be turned off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I've had a mid-tier OLED tv the last few months. The colors and contrast look phenomenal to me. You get true black on OLED since each pixel is individually lit.

I watch a lot of horror films which will have many dimly lit or night time scenes. OLED makes those scenes much easier to see because of increased contrast between dark and light.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

oleds are much better at almost everything, but it all comes crashing down because of burn in.

having a screen with a guaranteed explicit expiry date is a huge dealbreaker.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

OLED every time. The original PS Vita was far superior to the remake with the LCD, and the OLED Steam Deck is way better than the first model. Also the Switch OLED screen is very nice, but the Switch is garbage in general so screw it.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I like to read in the dark, and a black OLED screen with white text is so much more comfortable than even an e-ink screen for me.

LCDs are good for price, I guess. All my big monitors are LCD, but phone has to be OLED.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Even the most subtle burn in bothers me, but grey instead of black doesn't. LED is better than OLED for me.

As soon as there is a technology with the same colours as OLED with absolutely no burn in (and my existing displays get too old), I'll consider it.

OLED for my tv has been awesome, thinking I will go laser projector next though

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

quality: OLED wins by every conceivable metric

price: OLED is significantly more expensive but worth it (assuming you can afford it)

longevity: burn-in makes OLED worse but still (if you can afford it) reasonable.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bought a highly rated QLED a year ago

Already getting dark spots on the screen

Getting an OLED next time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My eye site is bad enough that I can't tell the difference.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

OLED, all day

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I still use a CRT as my only computer monitor (its significantly better than LCD; OLED is maybe equivalent to CRT picture quality nowadays)

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you might be a bit crazy, haha. I do have some nostalgia for CRT, but OLED is far better in every single way.

Larger available size, Higher available resolution and better clarity, Higher available refresh rate, Wider color gamut and more accurate colors, Higher contrast ratio, etc.

Not to mention how flickery CRT is.

I 100% get the appeal of old tech, but it's a bit silly to say it's equivalent to modern stuff.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

You're describing a typical budget CRT, and like typical budget flat screen panels today, they did suck. BUT...

CRT is a superior display technology and high end tubes have only recently been maybe matched in quality by specifically OLED. Manufacturers did not switch to flat panels because of superior quality, they did it because they are much cheaper to manufacture, handle, transport, and are more appealing to consumers due to energy use, weight, size/aspect ratio, and less configuration.

I have a Trinitron tube, which runs at 1600x1200@85Hz native (nearly the same number of pixels as full HD) and can be run at significantly higher resolutions, or lower resolutions at significantly higher Hz.

You mention flicker, which is a problem for typical budget low Hz CRTs, but is not a problem for better, high Hz tubes.

wider color gamut, more accurate colors, higher contrast ratio

Plainly incorrect. OLED is the first flat panel technology to basically match a CRT in image quality. CRT shows true black and near perfect color, they also can display any resolution without interpolation because they do not have pixels (a 720p image/video will look absolutely terrible displayed on a 1080p flat screen, but perfect on a CRT), and CRTs partially activate posphors for a more accurate image detail than the equivalent discrete pixel resolution. My Trinitron tube's detail is only limited by the spacing of the aperature grille, not the number of posphors. So comparing resolution is kind of apples to oranges. And this is why old low res games did actually look better on a CRT than they do now when played on modern flat screens. Example (this example uses a slot mask, not aperature grille, but still shows the effect of partially activated posphors):

There are real benefits to OLED (weight, size, wide aspect ratios [wide aspet ratios are only better for watching movies or TV though, worse for playing games or productivity/web browsing], energy use, gimmick refresh rates, gimmick resolutions like 4K and beyond), but picture quality is not one of them.

The biggest benefit to a CRT for me, besides true blacks, is input latency for competitive gaming. I don't understand how people can play games on flat screens with the cursor lagging behind the mouse's true position/movement. I guess you just get used to it and your brain adjusts for it, but having only really gamed on CRT, it is horrible any time I sit down at a friend's computer to play something.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What specific Trinitron do you have?

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'll agree that early LCD screens were really bad. TN looks terrible. I think a modern IPS or VA is a better experience than CRT in some ways, (often better color, better resolution, display size, etc.) but still has major issues like poor response time and motion clarity.

CRT does have some advantages– it is good for retro games, as a lot of pixel art was designed for the slight blur that CRTs have (waterfalls in some games, for example). And they do have good motion clarity compared to sample and hold displays, but it's because they are flickery. 85Hz flicker isn't as bad as 60hz, but it's still really uncomfortable for many people. It's one reason why almost nobody uses backlight strobing on LCD monitors. Not worth the tradeoff for most.

OLED really is pretty close to perfect, though. Vibrant accurate colors with excellent motion clarity and high refresh smoothness, virtually infinity contrast...

Trinitron really was ahead of its time, but a 32" 4k 240fps P3 OLED doesn't match it, it far exceeds it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm always worried about burn in so I prefer the kind of screen where that can't happen.

On the other hand, I like that OLED screens can be near paper thin. There are some applications of that, that I would really like to see eventually. Namely: Animated T-shirts.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

depends on the use case and the device.

[–] jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

All OLED all the way!

[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

for a phone, OLED all the way. they just look better, behave better, and have better battery life. for anything else, LCD is fine. it may not look the best but it's way cheaper and you have to worry less about burn in

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would add, handheld gaming to the phone use case for OLED.

yeah great addition. I repaired an OLED steam deck a month or two ago and I was blown away by how nice the screen looked compared to my LCD switch (which still looks impressively good for an LCD)

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I do like the OLED on my phone, however certain colors do show that the keyboard down at the bottom has now burned in. :(

Edit Bottom of my OLED phone on a white/gray background. No keyboard present:

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For phones, I prefer an LED. Better blacks and looks good, especially when used at night.

For work laptops and displays, I prefer LCD that are matte. Less reflection, usually cheaper in price, and no harm in it displaying a static image for extended number of hours everyday.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're both LED though. LCD screens have an LED backlight these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corno@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I've had both LCD monitors and OLED monitors and I'd say in terms of preference I prefer OLED. I'm an artist, so while I do mind the decrease in brightness compared to LCDs, after getting accustomed it's a small price to pay for the higher contrast and colour accuracy!

load more comments
view more: next ›