this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
751 points (92.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7390 readers
3969 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(this is a sarcastic post meant to highlight the absurdity of some of the “greater good” rhetoric we’ve been hearing, especially around leaving vulnerable populations like disabled people behind in case of revolution, basically accelerationism)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago

this is why so many people had an issue with the Democrat party platform of "let's sacrifice Palestine"

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I know that you're really concerned about being stabbed with knives. But you just need to accept the Hard Truth that you not being stabbed with knives is losing political issue! Really, that's why we're losing elections. You can't have everything that you want. And you need to see where the other side is coming from...

vs

I know that you're really concerned about being stabbed with knives. One of these candidates is implicitly okay with you being stabbed with knives, and the other wants to personally stab you with even more knives. I recognize the injustice in this and will therefore vote for neither of them! (the worse one won and now you're being stabbed with even more knives)

Who will win? (spoiler: I don't know but certainly not you because you're too busy being stabbed with knives)

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 7 points 23 hours ago

The entire concept of “accelerationism” is complete nonsense. First of all, none of the people advocating for it are willing to say, “Yes, I am perfectly happy to become homeless and starve to death in order to foment the revolution.”

And what are people gonna do? Take up arms? We’re just gonna wait until everyone is starving but armed with an AR-15 and then hope the state doesn’t crush us with nukes? It’s highly privileged absurdist faux revolutionary nonsense.

[–] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago (7 children)

No war but the class war. Everyone you disagree with is an ally in waiting except billionaires.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kaprap@leminal.space 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Essentially the 'left' on the topic of Palestine

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"The left, american left, and right should join hands to fight american right"

[–] clonedhuman@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything that gets you to target people with less power than you is a psy-op.

There is only one group of people to oppose. It's a small group of extremely wealthy people. All their mouthpieces on the internet are irrelevant (and likely bots) and are best ignored/blocked.

There is one small, powerful group who are the only justifiable targets. Everything else is a distraction and likely a divide-and-weaken tactic.

One small group of powerful, wealthy people. That is the enemy. No one with less power than you is worth focusing on.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

You’re absolutely right.

The billionaire owner class is at the root of all this. They own the politicians, they buy up the media outlets and bot farms to control the narrative, and they make our lives miserable in order to further pad their already incomprehensibly massive bank accounts.

Working class must look out for each other. We have so much more in common with our brothers and sisters across the aisle than we ever will have with these parasitic elites.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (37 children)

Fight all you want, by all means, bring those in power further left. But at the ballot box come election day, I don't care if the dem wants to sacrifice puppies on weekends. Guaranteed their Republican opponent has a factory grinding puppies into various consumer products by the millions. And their 3rd party counterpart likely has a greater chance of getting elected to mayor of flavortown than to congress/president (and also still probably kills puppies casually among friends themselves).

Is this system bullshit? Yup. Is it the one we got? Yup. We need to deal within that reality. By all means, let's work to change that system, but for the love of God, let's not shoot ourselves in the foot when our favorite candidate doesn't stand a chance in hell, or the more likely candidate is blatantly flawed (but still better than the alternative)

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

Buddy this post is about leftists. You are not a leftist. You're a left-leaning liberal. Read a book ffs.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't care if the dem wants to sacrifice puppies on weekends.

How's that been working for you? It looks to me like this attitude brought us Trump. Maybe it's time the Democrats started demanding better.

I say demanding. Sitting out an election doesn't count. The system doesn't change just because you refuse to participate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] parody@lemmings.world 31 points 1 day ago (35 children)

Difficult to raise this amongst friends but one 2022 story came to mind

https://www.vox.com/policy/385549/trans-sports-transgender-biden-harris-democrats-titleix

PS: obviously my conflict is about “fight for 1% of athletes vs. lose election to Hitlerguy and harm like 50% of the population”, to oversimplify greatly

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Liberals will say shit like this and then be baffled why leftists don't want to fall in line behind the party of moderate fascists.

You throw trans people under the bus and you also lose, or at least depress turnout, of everyone who supports trans rights. You also make it clear to every minority that if they're in the crosshairs next, they'll be sacrificed next for the same reasons of political convenience. Jews represented <1% of the population of Weimar Germany, and you may be familiar with a poem about what happened after they came for them.

Furthermore, by ceding ground to the Republicans on this you make them look correct and you discredit your own side for having previously denounced their position as bigoted, which makes people more likely to support Republicans. We saw this happen with the border, when the Democrats turned from "Building the wall is racist" to "We're the ones who are actually going to build the wall," they didn't win over moderate republicans, instead they lost on virtually every demographic. The people who are pro-immigration hated it and the people who are anti-immigration saw their views as being validated and if they had any lingering reservations about voting Republican, those reservations vanished.

Framing politics as a Trolley Problem is extremely stupid, and fundamentally not how the world works, it's liberal brainrot and one of the reasons Democrats are worthless. They literally did this "strategic" sacrifice with Palestinians and immigrants (and it's not like they fully supported trans rights either) and they still ate shit with the worst electoral map since the Republicans took California. When throwing trans people to the wolves doesn't work, which minority will you sacrifice next?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (12 children)

“fight for 1% of athletes vs. lose election to Hitlerguy and harm like 50% of the population”

Republicans who got on the "Freak out about transgender policy" lost their elections in droves in 2022. Several big swing Senate seats flipped because guys like Blake Masters and Herschel Walker couldn't stop screaming slurs at campaign rallies. We've seen Republicans scrub out over and over again by downing too much of their own kool-aid.

Democrats didn't lose 2024 because they were too nice to Transgender people. They lost because they were too nice to Liz Cheney. Harris made a big show of aligning with neoconservatives on everything from immigration and trade to military policies against Russia and China to the stubborn endorsement of the Palestine genocide. All of this shit polled worse than support for Transgender civil rights. Harris had no problem throwing the country in front of Hitlerguy to endorse the tear-gassing of Columbia University and the Kids In Cages on the Texas/Mexico border.

Even then... even if you can argue with a stack full of polling papers that Harris knew with perfect certainty and well in advance of the November vote that an impassioned speech in defense of transgender athletes would doom her campaign and subject the US to Hitlerguy, so what? She didn't do this and she still fucking lost.

So she and the rest of her squishy latte liberal cohort threw away a big chunk of LGBTQ support for what? What did Dems gain by embracing reactionary policy?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Democrats didn't lose 2024 because they were too nice to Transgender people. They lost because they were too nice to Liz Cheney.

This right here can't be said enough. The problem isn't policies that are too leftist. It's the "liberals" that a working so hard to cozy up to conservatives. If we wanted moderate Republicans we'd vote for 'em. We want fucking leftists goddammit!!!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

reminds me of 2003, when the bush regime convinced everyone that their marriage would somehow be worthless if they let the gays get married.

and it worked, the stupid fucks bought it. iraq paid badly for it tho, whoo hoo...

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you aren't going to fight for that "1% of athletes" even though you think they're right just because they're too politically inconvenient then I have zero faith you'll fight for me when I'm politically inconvenient and actually need you to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The problem with this is that it assumes Democrats have no agency. Democratic politicians have treated trans issues like those crusty old male Dems who don't like saying the word abortion.

Dems have never provided loud and full-throated support to trans issues. Go watch the recent John Oliver video on trans sports. There are very very good arguments on why excluding trans people from sports is incredibly anti-scientific and just thinly disguised bigotry. But Democratic politicians have never bothered developing the talking points to defend trans people, like they have for other core issues.

Look at how Kamala responded when asked about trans issues. She didn't provide full-throated support to trans people. Her reply was simply, "I'll follow the law."

Democrats have completely failed to defend trans people. They've quietly passed a few state level anti-discrimination laws, but in terms of rhetoric, they've completely ceded the space to conservatives. The only mainstream voices talking about trans issues have been the anti-trans bigots. The Democrats have instead just called the whole issue a distraction and hoped it would all just blow away.

They're right that it is a distraction, an artificial one concocted by Republicans. But that doesn't mean they can just ignore it.

Propaganda works. And if you don't do the hard rhetorical work to fight it, it eventually does change public opinion.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Her reply was simply, "I'll follow the law."

Well, that's more than she was willing to do for Gaza.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 42 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I bet we could get even more of these conservatives on our side if we promised to repeal gay marriage. Let's try that, too

Ooh, and we could get even more people if we promised to put the Jews in camps

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Is that the youtube poop person?

load more comments
view more: next ›