this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
758 points (92.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7454 readers
2709 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(this is a sarcastic post meant to highlight the absurdity of some of the “greater good” rhetoric we’ve been hearing, especially around leaving vulnerable populations like disabled people behind in case of revolution, basically accelerationism)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem with this is that it assumes Democrats have no agency. Democratic politicians have treated trans issues like those crusty old male Dems who don't like saying the word abortion.

Dems have never provided loud and full-throated support to trans issues. Go watch the recent John Oliver video on trans sports. There are very very good arguments on why excluding trans people from sports is incredibly anti-scientific and just thinly disguised bigotry. But Democratic politicians have never bothered developing the talking points to defend trans people, like they have for other core issues.

Look at how Kamala responded when asked about trans issues. She didn't provide full-throated support to trans people. Her reply was simply, "I'll follow the law."

Democrats have completely failed to defend trans people. They've quietly passed a few state level anti-discrimination laws, but in terms of rhetoric, they've completely ceded the space to conservatives. The only mainstream voices talking about trans issues have been the anti-trans bigots. The Democrats have instead just called the whole issue a distraction and hoped it would all just blow away.

They're right that it is a distraction, an artificial one concocted by Republicans. But that doesn't mean they can just ignore it.

Propaganda works. And if you don't do the hard rhetorical work to fight it, it eventually does change public opinion.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Her reply was simply, "I'll follow the law."

Well, that's more than she was willing to do for Gaza.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and now gaza is safe, and everyone clapped.

oh wait, no, trump wants to annex it.

along with greenland and canada and the panama canal.

something tells me these populations would have preferred the 'I'll follow the law' candidate happily vs the 'i'll annex your country unilaterally' shitbag.

but you don't fucking care about any of them lol. you got your principled win, good for you, and now the trans folks will be persecuted actively, gaza will be torn apart and sold to the highest bidders, and american kids are going to die invading our former allies.

great fucking work, your principles are fantastic.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

gaza will be torn apart and sold to the highest bidders

Sorry, now that's going to happen? What the hell did you think was happening before?