this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
656 points (98.8% liked)

196

2869 readers
1865 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemmings.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s quite concerning that something like 37% of the land on this planet is used for agriculture with most of it used for livestock. Biodiversity is being destroyed so we can enjoy a grilled ribeye.

So, I understand the enthusiasm for lab-grown meat. At the same time, I don’t trust big corporations and their captured government agencies to be truthful about the long-term health effects of something like lab-grown meat, and I also expect the positive environmental impact may get overstated to push for outlawing traditional livestock in favor of lab-grown meat for which a handful of big corporations will own patents. Patented seeds for plants that don’t produce viable seeds and lab-grown meat sounds like a good way for corporations to have complete control over humanity’s food supply, more so than they do already.

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Starting to think a significant portion of rich people genuinely view suffering as an essential if not occult component to the value of their products. Like it means more to them when a thing suffers or dies to produce what they have.

[–] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

diamond rings come to mind, i dont know why some people have a bone to pick with lab-grown diamonds, does the horrible labor behind mining make the "real thing" better?

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Same. To some, yes.

[–] SlimeKnight@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not just products but life as a whole.

Too many people have the mentality of "If I suffered, you should to", or equate their value to their suffering "Suffering builds character", "You only slept 6 hours? Try 4 like me".

Humanity has an unhealthy obsession with suffering equating validation.

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Yes. Hearing about how pre colonial Hawaiians worked like 9-12am and were so efficient they could spend the rest of the day playing, makes me deeply sad to see how far we’ve regressed.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No more farmers, lab grown food! Better for the environment, better for animals. Win win. Farmers in The Netherlands are seriously fucked up, going as far as threatening politicians with murder at their private home. So fuck meat, dairy and egg farmers. We only need fruits and vegetables, and lab grown meat is a nice addition.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I didn't find an answer in my very limited search for what is actually used to grow the meat, so depending on what makes up the "stuff" that brings nutrients into the growing part, we may still need a lot of farmers for something like this. There's also no way the growing environment, which seeks to create an artificial "animal", is energyefficient.

I'll celebrate the day we don't need farmers, and I'll celebrate the day it'll be at least environmentally equivolent, but until I see evidence of those things, I'll be very sceptical of this stuff.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I didn’t find an answer in my very limited search for what is actually used to grow the meat

If you're referencing how cultured meat used to require amniotic fluids to grow meat, those days are long-since passed and there are multiple companies that have proven methodology for production, the only thing preventing large-scale cultured-meat operations is commercial investment and public sentiment.

Your skepticism here is a product of the pushback against lab-grown meat, they have injected endless lies and hyperbolic ideas into the public discourse because it threatens the beef industry, which is currently our least efficient protein source by far, so as the climate changes and as our tarifs turn into gulag-like isolation from the international market, you're basically going to have to choose between $40.00 burgers and laboratory-grown beef that tastes the same but is healthier and cheaper.

Since humans are so easily swayed by the most pathetic arguments and propaganda campaigns, and are so incredibly to make scared, disgusted or hateful of literally anything, I don't expect to see lab-grown meat in my lifetime sadly.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I hope I'm wrong, but my point is that without more information, I would have to see some actual data to compare this stuff. I am however aware that we won't get reliable data until large-scale production is both possible, and profitable.

It's the same scepticism I have when a new building material says it's much better for the environment, but then it turns out it's either not possible to upscale to the point that it's actually environmentally friendly, because it uses a very limited by-product from a different production. Or it turns out they don't count the materials needed for the underlying construction to make it possible to use, because it's not directly part of the material.

I just want some proper articles about this stuff, with actual numbers and calculations made public, instead of a picture shared on some social media.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I just want some proper articles about this stuff, with actual numbers and calculations made public, instead of a picture shared on some social media.

It's a commercial venture, so a lot of it is kept behind some level of secrecy because this is capitalism baybeeeee. That said, if you are actually interested in the numbers, you can probably look up organizations like The Good Food Institute who are giving millions in grants to scientific methods for alternative protein sources and they have a public outreach where you can read up on their science and scientists, but if you want technical specs... well, see every other technology like AI, microprocessors, the formulas for popular snacks and and sodas.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 168 points 4 days ago (31 children)

But in all seriousness I would love if lab meats became economically viable.

Imagine being able to have some lab grown mammoth. Enjoy something our ancestors did

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The moment corporations see they are cheaper, they'll start pushing for them, exaggerating their benefits like environmental impact as a propaganda tool.

But there would still be slaughtered meats for as long as there are rich assholes paying for "the true experience" or just because it's not something everyone gets to do and they like to feel unique and superior to the rest of humanity.
Knowing those out-of-touch monsters, they'd double down in 'the experience' by getting to slaughter the animal themselves or something like that.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (3 children)

rich assholes paying for “the true experience”

See also: "actually lab diamonds are too perfect, the subtle imperfections and discolorations really enhance the je ne se quoi of blood diamonds"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, that's almost a perfect win. If farming animals for meat becomes something for the 0.01%, imagine how much better things would be. How much less strain we'd put on the planet, and how much animal suffering would be prevented.

And we'd be only a few guillotines away from a full solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 4 days ago (8 children)

i just want cheap blocks of TVP available in the store

we've had the technology to make TVP for decades, it's a perfectly fine replacement for meat if you just marinate it a bit, why the fuck is it not bog standard?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No farmers no food!

lab grown meat joins the game

Oy! That's not fair!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Am I the only one that feels bad about how that guy feels about fucking up his marriage? Lol.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago

Nah that's real

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago (13 children)

the only reason i'd have an issue with it is because of the markup on most items like this (looking in your direction beyond and morningstar).

if they can have a sustainable and ethical method of creating food then it should be free to everyone who needs it.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 3 days ago

Potatoes aren't even free so I doubt that is happening.

Cheaper food would be a good start, potatoes and rice are incredibly cheap foods.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

At least in the US I'd say it's because the government pumps billions and billions in subsidies to the different farm sectors (70+ billion a year for beef alone). The products you mentioned don't get that funding and don't sell the volume either.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lab grown food is legitimately super expensive to make though.

[–] damdy@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

When I got a playstation 2, my stepfather was amazed it had a blue led. They were crazy expensive just a few years earlier and this console just used one for no real reason other than it looked good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The tricky part of lab grown meat is you need to keep it from being infected.

Keep the factory perfectly sterile.

Any time a vat is colonised by fungi or bacteria or a virus its contents would have to be dumped and the equipment sterilised

That's going to be expensive.

It will need feedstock. It will produce waste CO2

Meanwhile a cow has an immune system and eats low quality grass.

Lab meat will not be able to compete with field grown meat

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (15 children)

Meat eating ties into a lot of people conceptions of masculinity. The idea that you might be eating something that didn’t have to die takes the power and dominance out of it - a sexual politics of meat if you will.

I’m not saying this is true of everyone who eats meat - but there is a certain type that this unambiguously true for. Think of the guys with the aviator glasses sitting in the truck pfp - eating dead cow is as American and masculine as fucking women.

(Think about how much the absolutely stupid “if vegs hate meat so much, why do they make fake meat?” sounds like “if lesbians don’t like mean, why do they use dildos?)

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's... A theory, pretty sure it's more that meat just tastes good though

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Yes - it is that way for normal people. Notice the amount of qualifiers in my original statement.

There is a disturbing undercurrent to some people’s understanding of meat - to the point where people like Jordan Peterson (others too) have made themselves sick on “carnivore” diets.

I am talking about the kind of people mentioned in the OP that are upset that fake meat options exist. Part of the reason these people are upset - because any rational meat eater would be like cool, more food options - is that they view synthetic meats or even people choosing not to eat meat as an attack on their personal identity, which for these individuals is constructed around this weird patriarchal nationalist thing.

When I get a honey butter chicken biscuit from Whata, I’m doing it because I’m hungry and those things taste like crack. For some men, eating meat is something they have this complex about - you eat a steak because you aren’t a weak little soy boy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

My vegan perspective: I'm uncomfortable with foods that continue to reproduce the aesthetics of exploitation and probably wouldn't eat it myself. But because it's affect on the world would likely include a sizable reduction in actual real animal exploitation, I'd welcome it's introduction and maybe even promote it to some.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago

Thats an interesting take. Most people don't eat meat specifically because its exploitative, they eat it because its easier (relatively) to get the needed nutrients through meat, and because its taste and texture are hard to replicate. Lab grown meat manages to do this (hopefully) without any exploitation.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Well rn lab grown meat is even worse in terms of CO2 than animal farming, so don't get your hopes up yet. Yeah, sure, it means less animals getting thrown into the torture and murder machine, but if you really want to make a difference it's by convincing peoples to go vegan, at least in this decade

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I was mostly thinking about taste and texture. I never even considered that the CO2 impact might be worse. That sucks.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I watched a video (no source) on this stuff a while back and it compared the carbon footprint of plant based diets, meat alternatives and meat and came to the conclusion that the current way lab grown meat (not plant protein shaped like meat like planted, beyond etc) of the kind that article means can actually be more carbon intensive to produce than factory farmed chicken. (The least carbon intense meat). That said it is still better than free range beef, but one should consider the reason why one buys this. Vegans seem to not like it either because it resembles meat or because it contains the cells harvested from real animals and meat eaters don't like it because its not real meat, not to mention it's insanely expensive, just eat the plant protein, its not that bad lol. (Also put on a linear scale the carbon footprint of beef compared to plant based protein and fake meat is insane, thinking about that video alwqys makes me eat less meat)

That's partly because they fail to market it well. Meat alternatives never taste the same. Trying to replace beef or pork or chicken will always fail to entice people that already enjoy meat.

It's better described as a new meat with new recipe/cooking requirements. You wouldn't complain about how much the assumed pork ribs didn't taste right if I told you they were beef ribs. You'd agree, because you wouldn't expect them to taste the same.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

I would absolutely eat this if it was the same price, or even slightly more expensive, than equivalent beef.

[–] EySkibidiBabBab@feddit.dk 19 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I probably wouldn't eat it myself. Not due to "Muh meat. Muh masculinityh!" -- but because i feel like, that everytime we mess too much with food, we end up making it bad for ourselves in some weird way. Processed foods and all that jazz.

So i'll continue eating my legumes, greens and the monthly beef.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

I agree. I remember when skim milk and margarine were supposed to be good for you. Beans and peas already exist, are cheap, store forever, and can be used in so many different ways. Fake meat feels like an overly complicated way to solve a problem that's already solved, with the added bonus that they could cause horrific health problems that won't be identified for decades.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Processed food isn't bad for you.. GMOs aren't bad for you.. that's the propaganda farmers use to keep you from making common sense choices.

"Processed" is anything that goes into a machine. You want your beef ground up? It's now processed. What's added in the processing is what you need to isolate and be weary of.

"Genetically Modified Organisms" includes bananas which have been selectively cultivated to provide more nutrition and reduce seed sizes. It's a result of intelligent agricultural practices to maximize food production and minimize inedible waste.

Plant based meat has been an incredible substitution for meat making it cruelty free without compromising much on taste or texture, if at all.

Lab grown is the next step, making genuine meat without slaughtering animals. I'm not aligned with PETA but I think an ideal future is one where we don't need to kill sentient life in order to have exactly what we do right now.

You can have your own opinion but at the very least be aware of the origin of your bias.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›