this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
827 points (97.4% liked)

The Onion

5710 readers
676 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The online incel community has taken a break from blaming women for their ongoing failures in life to issue a collective tantrum over Netflix’s new drama Adolescence, which dares—dares, mind you—to portray incel culture as the toxic, rage-filled echo chamber it so demonstrably is.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I would call Adolescence a very surface-level view of incel culture. It's fairly accurate, but you'd need a much longer series to truly get the culture across. Contrapoints' video on incels is a really good breakdown of the mindset.

[–] doug@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah this was my main problem with it was it was just very surface-level. Like I'm glad it's being brought to the table for discussion for mainstream audiences, but it felt a bit glossed over like something I'd heard from an NPR story on video games; "did you know about this thing called incel culture? it's all the rage with the youths."

I don't know what the solution is or how I want to see it conveyed, but I recall Polytechnique doing a better job at instilling horror in me from incel culture than Adolescence, albeit it was more subtle, and that was from 2009.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gurnu@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“It’s a hit job,” said one Reddit user, who goes by the username DarkMageOfTruth99.

Oh geez I snorted so hard at the username I farted

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would have went with DarkMageOfTruth69, but maybe it was already taken

[–] analoghobbyist@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

He's such a gentleman he prefers to cuddle, hence the 99.

[–] Jiggs@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Is it actually worthwhile or just another attempt to spark more conflict between men and women?

Because honestly I can hardly see as anything more than a way to profit off demonizing men that I assume already feel abandoned and, correct me if Im wrong, are not getting much support either

May I please get a summary on their take somewhere?

[–] Ghosthacked@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The world doesn't guarantee you anything.

In the history of our species, only about 20-30% of males have managed to reproduce, so what's with the sad face?

You're not entitled to anything, so own your inceldom.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Human beings have brains that were forged during hardships and ice-ages to make us inclined to form groups for survival. Those same drives make us desperate for a social identity, to the degree that we literally can die without social identity. (A fascinating field of study btw.)

This has made the internet the most dangerous tool we've ever created, because it has allowed people to deconstruct the very notion of group identity and exploit the drives in our own brains to connect with others. This is why we have so much absurd bullshit now, so many conspiracy theories, flat earthers, incels and redpill grifters, science-deniers and chemtrailophiles. People are finding their own, almost random group identities to connect with, groups that often have no real connection to reality, and just offer validation for people's feelings.

Validation for feelings is the next most important thing for humans, because it reflects how our brains actually work. Most people are under the impression that the brain is the seat of intelligence, that brains are calculating machines that work out problems and come to logical conclusions. Even if you don't think this, you have most likely at least become comfortable in trusting what you work out in your head.

But brains are not reasonable or rational, there was no such thing in the ancient world that shaped our brains. That world was just threats and signs of threats. If your ancestor had a brain that could accurately connect the sign of a threat to an actual threat, they would likely be prepared and survive. See a paw-print by the watering hole? Maybe there's a predator around.

That same tool now functions the same way in a vastly different environment, and it tells us wild stories that aren't even connected with reality to explain the things we feel. The brain notices you feel fear, it looks around and pieces together things to explain that fear. Feel sad? Brain digs around and starts randomly tying strings together to explain it. No reason, no logic. This is where much of our mental health epidemic is coming from, unchecked brains doing what nature intended them to do, in a world nature never intended.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shekau@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The life of an incel is very hard...

[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

And to make it worse, you get no help with it

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (26 children)

I identify as an incel. I don't visit the incel web spaces though and I don't blame women for it.

I'm an incel because I can't afford to date. Like every week I'm barely able to get by living in poverty. Dating takes time and at least some money. If I got a little more of either, I'd have to use it to better my situation before dating.

I bring this point up because, as toxic as incel culture is, I rarely see it tied back to the shitty economy. Just people pointing fingers at each other as though the Male Loneliness phenomenon were entirely the result of people's personalities.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I would stop identifying yourself as an incel. It's more than just being involuntarily celibate and you seem far too well-adjusted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are looking at the etymology of the term "incel" and then assuming that's the actual meaning. But it isn't. Incel culture is not about people who are too poor to date. If it were, they'd be complaining about minimum wage in the next paragraph, right? But that is not what we see.

I see incel culture tied to sexism, selfishness, and often an willingness to try hard. Do we see it waxing and waning together with the economy? I don't think we do, so I don't think it's closely connected.

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yep and a big part of it is blame shifting onto women. The running theme I find in incel subs is that they don't actually do anything about their issues, other than maybe some appearance based work sometimes. They just wallow in blame shifting and self pity

[–] Englishgrinn@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

This is the key element of incel culture - if one member of the group tries to improve themselves in anyway, it's an attack on the whole group and they are ostracized from what feels like their only social group.

"What? You started exercising and showering? Who do you think you are? Who are you trying to kid? You're just playing the slut's game, man"

All social bubbles are at least a little harmful - but incel culture is more than that, it's purposefully self-destructive. You have to be sad, miserable, and let your life fall apart to belong. It takes advantage of social instincts in the worst possible way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Tbh at this point calling yourself an incel because you're involuntary celibate is like calling yourself a homophobe because you're scared of gay people. Technically accurate, but do you really wanna go there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

We need a tinder for poor people, those who don't have the economic means to date, but would have their situation bettered by joining forces with one or more like-minded and equally fin-locked partners.

We could call it Prolescroll, PlentyOfRamen, Stumble, econHarmony

[–] lemmy566567@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

It would only have men.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

ok, I love this idea lol. "PlentyOfRamen"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And yet, I have seen places of abject poverty where people sing to eachother and sing together, they have joys and romance. Dirt poor people are making sweet love together and having kids and I don't know how but they just keep on going.

So the economy is part of it, yes, but poverty isn't a barrier to gettin some lovin, because it doesn't cost anything to get a woman's attention.

There must be more to the story, there is something else going on with our culture and our society that makes it seem impossible.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I agree, I think there's more to the story.

As for the example, I agree that there are impoverished places where people get along fine in their socio-economic status, meaning wealth is not a necessary factor.

I think the key difference with what's going on now in the western world is that young males are disproportionately being pushed to the bottom of the socio economic ladder with the cultural expectation that they have the same resource capacity as their older counter parts.

Another commenter noted the loss of third spaces and I'd add communities in general. People used to date within their communities more, I assume.

So I think it's more to the story like you said. Probably some perfect storm, of which, the general loneliness in the world is but one expression of.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The places you talk about still have a public social life, 3rd spaces, etc. In advanced capitalist countries, there is no public space without some sort of consumption.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dont think that counts my dude. You just broke. You could probably go get laid if you really wanted to. These guys online are different.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 83 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Incel is such an oddly self reinforcing thing. As I recall it the term started as a self identification (I can't get laid, there for am an involuntary-celibate), which ended up with these self ID people declaring someone else is at fault for their situation, then that attitude got so pervasive it became a given term (you can't get laid BECAUSE you're an incel).

Morphing of language and all, similar happened with 'woke'. Either way, if these folks could comprehend a simple fact that the one person you can demand change of is yourself then maybe they could get out of that cycle.

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is a sad story:

When Alana started a website for lonely people struggling to find love, she had no idea it would become linked to a community of hate and anger directed at women, which would ultimately lead to the deaths of several innocent people in her home city.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago

Obviously a parody site but Adolescence is a powerful drama worth watching.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Not the onion. Check any of the forums on reddit, like r/mensrights, and they're furious indeed.

I had to explain to someone what the manosphere is, as a result of watching this show together. She had no idea that men were getting radicalized like this.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 65 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Imagine if the "manosphere" actually did things like raising awareness for testicular and prostate cancer, teaching men how to be good dads/husbands/sons, how to be financially sensible, how to build a career, etc. instead of blaming all their problems and all the world's problems on women and feminists lmao

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 69 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The current manosphere is basically a pipeline to the alt-right and additional radicalization. The distance between incel to proud boys is quite small.

The problem is that any attempt to make a pro-men group with any of the positive agendas you list will attract the same people as an audience that are already in the manosphere. And then you have the Nazi bar problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 38 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Ironically feminism gets you closer to this than anything they've cooked up over a very long period of time

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Slam_Eye@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Incel tv show = scroll reddit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (15 children)

I had no idea that incel was a term that people used to self-identify.

I thought it was only a slur.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (7 children)

When the term was first coined, it was not an insult. It was from a support group for people who had trouble finding a partner.

[–] ratofkryll@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

The ultimate irony is that the first popular incel support community was started by a woman.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›