this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
585 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

67338 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Remember that 54% of adults in American cannot read beyond a 6th grade level, with 21% being fully illiterate.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] admin@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I will do you one better, HOW THE FUCK?

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago

Home-skoolin

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Our education system in the USA is so bad. 😔

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Good thing we nuked the Dept of Ed

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

moron opens encyclopedia "Wow, this book is smart."

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

If it's so smart, why is it just laying around on a bookshelf and not working a job to pay rent?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well, if somebody thinks this, it's kind of true isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Next you'll tell me half the population has below average intelligence.

Not really endorsing LLMs, but some people...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago

Even if an ai has access to more facts and information you should feel confident in your human ability to reason through the data you do know, search new information and process it in the context.

If you think an ai does all this better than you then you need to try harder.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nearly half of U.S. adults

Half of LLM users (49%)

No, about a quarter of U.S. adults believe LLMs are smarter than they are. Only about half of adults are LLM users, and only about half of those users think that.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

to be fair they're American and they're LLM users, so for a selected group like that odds are they really are as stupid as LLMs.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

LLMs don't even think. Four year olds are more coherent. Given the state of politics, the people thinking LLMs are smarter than them are probably correct.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

literally dogs are smarter and have more reasoning ability.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Nearly half of llm users are dumber than they seem

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I think of what causes the average person to consider another to be “smart,” like quickly answering a question about almost any subject, giving lots of detail, and most importantly saying it with confidence and authority, LLMs are great at that shit!

They might be bad reasons to consider a person or thing “smart,” but I can’t say I’m surprised by the results. People can be tricked by a computer for the same reasons they can be tricked by a human.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So LLMs are confident you say. Like a very confident man. A confidence man. A conman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i guess the 90% marketing (re: linus torvalds) is working

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

oh my god 49% of LLM users are pathologically stupid.

and still wrong.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Still better than reddit users...

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

where do you think these idiots spend their time?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I try not to think about them, honestly. (งツ)ว

you're a healthier person than I.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is sad. This does not spark joy. We're months from someone using "but look, ChatGPT says..." To try to win an argument. I can't wait to spend the rest of my life explaining to people that LLMs are really fancy bullshit generator toys.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Already happened in my work. People swearing an API call exists because an LLM hallucinated it. Even as the people who wrote the backend tells them it does not exist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Given the US adults I see on the internet, I would hazard a guess that they're right.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm starting to think an article referring to LLM as AI is s red flag, while them referring to them as LLM is a green flag.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

Always has been

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

"US".... Even LLM won't vote for Trump

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This is hard to quantify. I use them constantly throughout my work day now.

Are they smarter than me? I'm not sure. Haven't thought too much about it.

What they certainly are, and by a long shot, is faster. Given a set of data, I could analyze it and pull out insights and conclusions. It might take me a week or a month depending on the size and breadth of the data set. An LLM can pull out insights and conclusions in seconds.

I can read error stacks coming from my code, but before I've even read the first few lines the LLM has ingested all of them, checked the code, and reached a conclusion about the necessary fix. Is it right, optimal, and avoid creating other bugs? Like 75% at this point. I can coax it, interate on the solution my self, or do it entirely myself with the understanding of the bug that it granted me. This same bug might have taken hours to figure out myself.

My point is, I'm not sure how to compare smarter vs orders of magnitude faster.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 5 points 6 days ago

Are you smarter than a calculator?

load more comments
view more: next ›