this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1215 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66584 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chairsushi@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 22 hours ago

Then let it be over then.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Good. I hope this is what happens.

  1. LLM algorithms can be maintained and sold to corpos to scrape their own data so they can use them for in house tools, or re-sell them to their own clients.
  2. Open Source LLMs can be made available for end users to do the same with their own data, or scrape whats available in the public domain for whatever they want so long as they don't re-sell
  3. Altman can go fuck himself
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 15 points 23 hours ago

But if you stop me from criming, how will I get better at crime!?!

[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

No amigo, it's not fair if you're profiting from it in the long run.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is basically a veiled admission that OpenAI are falling behind in the very arms race they started. Good, fuck Altman. We need less ultra-corpo tech bro bullshit in prevailing technology.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

To be fair copyright is a disease. But then so is billionaires, capitalism, business, etc.

I mean, if there's a war, and you shoot somebody, does that make you bad?

Yes and no.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago
[–] bruhssa@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

These fuckers are the first one to send tons of lawyers whenever you republish or use any IP of them. Fuck these idiots.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I have conflicting feelings about this whole thing. If you are selling the result of training like OpenAI does (and every other company), then I feel like it’s absolutely and clearly not fair use. It’s just theft with extra steps.

On the other hand, what about open source projects and individuals who aren’t selling or competing with the owners of the training material? I feel like that would be fair use.

What keeps me up at night is if training is never fair use, then the natural result is that AI becomes monopolized by big companies with deep pockets who can pay for an infinite amount of random content licensing, and then we are all forever at their mercy for this entire branch of technology.

The practical, socioeconomic, and ethical considerations are really complex, but all I ever see discussed are these hard-line binary stances that would only have awful corporate-empowering consequences, either because they can steal content freely or because they are the only ones that will have the resources to control the technology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think the answer is there just do what deepseek did.

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 38 points 1 day ago

Fuck these psychos. They should pay the copyright they stole with the billions they already made. Governments should protect people, MDF

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

TLDR: "we should be able to steal other people's work, or we'll go crying to daddy Trump. But DeepSeek shouldn't be able to steal from the stuff we stole, because China and open source"

[–] weremacaque@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good. If I ever published anything, I would absolutely not want it to be pirated by AI so some asshole can plagiarize it later down the line and not even cite their sources.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the end of the day the fact that openai lost their collective shit when a Chinese company used their data and model to make their own more efficient model is all the proof I need they don't care about being fair or equitable when they get mad at people doing the exact thing they did and would aggressively oppose others using their own work to advance their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don't want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn't have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Either we can now have full authority to do anything we want with copyright, or the companies have to have to abide the same rules the plebs and serfs have to and only take from media a century ago, or stuff that fell through the cracks like Night of the Living Dead.

Copyright has always been a farce and a lie for the corporations, so it's nothing new that its "Do as I say, not as I do."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BostonSamurai@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh no, not the plagiarizing machine! How are rich hacks going to feign talent now? Pay an artist for it?! Crazy!

[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

I dont wanna be mean but I always thought this guy had a weird face

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

Sounds fair, shut it down.

[–] Daerun@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why training openai with literally millions of copyrighted works is fair use, but me downloading an episode of a series not available in any platform means years of prison?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Do you promise?!?!

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Good. Fuck AI

[–] faberyayo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck OpenAI for stealing the hard work of millions of people

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago

If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 46 points 1 day ago

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

[–] __UnicornPower__@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an artist, kindly get fucked ass hole. I'd like compensation for all the work of mine you stole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"How are we supposed to win the race if we can't cheat?!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Maybe as a consumer product but governments will still want it

[–] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Vote pirate party.

[–] psyspoop@lemm.ee 152 points 2 days ago (22 children)

But I can't pirate copyrighted materials to "train" my own real intelligence.

load more comments (22 replies)

Time to sail the high seas.

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Open can suck some dick.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good, end this AI bullshit, it has little upsides and a metric fuckton of downsides for the common man

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›