this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
655 points (99.4% liked)

News

26331 readers
3185 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

CBS has moved to dismiss Donald Trump’s $20 billion lawsuit over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, calling it an attack on the First Amendment.

Trump alleges CBS edited the interview to harm him politically, citing “voter interference.” CBS attorneys argue the lawsuit seeks to punish “constitutionally protected editorial judgments” and is “without basis in law or fact.”

If not dismissed, CBS wants it moved to New York, where its headquarters is located.

The move comes as a surprise because CBS had considered settling to avoid delaying its $8 billion merger with Skydance Media, which requires regulatory approval.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Demanding $20 billion for editorial discretion? This lawsuit screams desperation, not justice.

😺😺😺🐱

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 14 points 6 hours ago

It screams judicial intimidation and abuse. How does he claim $20 billion in damages when he WON the fucking election? Hes been in office for less than 3 months, and he's already made more than that from his various scams.

[–] InversionOfControl@lemmy.world 221 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

CBS helped elect this clown. I distinctly recall in 2015 CBS cutting away from live Hillary Clinton rallies in the middle of her speech to instead go live to Trump’s empty podium before he even came out on stage.

I have no sympathy for what this administration does to the oligarchs legacy media corps now. And fuck Washington Post especially

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 39 points 12 hours ago

Jeff Bezos to be specific. WP is basically just a shell now.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I distinctly recall in 2015 CBS cutting away from live Hillary Clinton rallies in the middle of her speech to instead go live to Trump’s empty podium before he even came out on stage.

Yeah, but he's a MAN. A bigly important BUSINESS man, too, no less. So obviously it's much more important to get all ready to hear what he is going to say, as opposed to broadcasting some mere woman - who everyone is saying is incredibly shrill and omg, that laugh [1], amirite? - and any of her so-called ideas.

/s, just in case anyone thinks that real....

[1] If anyone needs evidence of just how skewed coverage is of Hillary (and Kamala) vs. little d, examining how they talk about their laugh is instructive. I mean, I'm not sure I've ever seen donnie ever have what looks like a genuine human emotion when it comes to humor. He does that weird grimace when he or someone else is punching down on someone. But have you ever seen the guy laugh at a joke or something that is not mean-spirited? The guy seems like he's just very unhappy, and I find that far more weird than anything about Hillary or Kamala's laugh. I think a lot of weak men hear a woman laughing and assume it's AT THEM, so that's why there was so much time spent on talking about it...

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think they really care whether they're dealing with a man or woman. They happily cut Bernie out of coverage as well in the primaries to favor Clinton.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I guess that's true, but they then proceeded to constantly dunk on Hillary and often for the most stupid of reasons: emails, Benghazi, her laugh, having hot sauce, she was obviously at death's door, etc.

I mean, if they kneecapped Bernie so they got a more centrist candidate, they then started playing with fire by employing the bothsiderist nonsense. In many cases, it was not even bothsiderist, it was tipping the scales in favor of little d, whether it's because they wanted their horse race or because their corporate masters wanted tax cuts. In any case, I am sure more than a few knew exactly what they were doing. And I'm sure more than a few of them knew, even then, just how dangerous and flawed someone like little d is.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 245 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

CBS realized if they gave in, Trump had no plans of stopping attacks whatsoever. So if you're gonna get attacked anyways, you might as well fight back .

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, I recently read a Guardian article about how the crackdown on non-violent protestors in the UK is leading climate activists to a little more, uh, active forms of protest. If you're going to jail for five years anyway, you might as well make it count.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure it works the same way with the mafia. I doubt companies that pay extortion to the mafia only do a one-time payment.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The can't legally make allowing the merger to be a conditionon a settlement agreement. So there'd be nothing to keep his petty ass from stopping it either way.

They're greedy and would do anything for the merger, but Trump doesn't honor his deals.

[–] fan0m@lemmy.world 70 points 21 hours ago

This is the way

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Corporations and their owners thought that Trump would boost the stock market through tax cuts. Instead the market is tanking due to his moronic tariffs and Russia-appeasement strategy. Now that it’s clear he won’t be making them money they have rediscovered their “morals”.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

I hope this is true. I've always hoped that the one think that might save us is MAGA's virtuosic incompetence.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is the only logical move they have. Good to see someone still has ethical brains in business these days.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I hope everyone dealing with him recognizes this and stops trying to deal with him

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

No no, don't worry. They're still going to work for him and do his bidding, they're just not going to be bullied into paying him $20billion over a factually imaginary grievance. They'll get the case thrown and then issue a public apology for having to defend themselves and then immediately hardline into defending the administration. Tale as old as time.

This is of course assuming the admin doesn't simply revoke their broadcast license before they get the chance to bend back over.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 109 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting signs when corporations are starting to push back. Glad to see a news organization being at the front of the charge.

[–] Murdeth@lemmy.world 55 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

The motivation is still about money. It's a corporation.

[–] Duckabush@lemmings.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Even if it is about money it helps our country get these clowns closer to our

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 13 hours ago

Oh no doubt, but they thought they could appease him somehow. Now they're realizing that once you're on his list there's no getting back in his good graces. Peace was never an option.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In the short term, the motivation doesn’t matter as long as they’re on the right side.

It means you can’t trust them, but motivation is not the issue.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

My enemy's enemy...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Yes, but we take what we can get and push where we can push. We want them more financially afraid of fascist success than socialist success

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 50 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Every single trump voter and supporter should drink a gallon of methanol. It’ll protect them from measles.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

sadly, if we told them the "dems definitely don't want you to drink methanol, because it's bad for you", there'd be some who'd do it out of spite. this is literally what's happening with vaccines, but one's mental blindness leading to physical blindness has some poetry to it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Methanol increases sex hormone production and fertility. It's Elon's secret that the left is hiding from you. But you gotta build it up like those people do with hydrogen peroxide.

Actually we might just loudly decaying the h2o2 people. It's just water with more oxygen, what could go wrong

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Whoa, H2O2 isn't nearly as bad as dihydrogenmonoxide. That stuff is not only deadly to plants, but causes a lot of deaths per year with people too. For your own health, stay away from dihydrogenmonoxide.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Easier said than done. Studies have shown that pretty much everyone in the world has at least some dihydrogen monoxide in their bloodstream, and it's even been detected in the deepest parts of the ocean.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Just imagine if something deadlier than the covid virus infiltrated this country. And somebody developed a vaccine for it and these idiots wouldn't take it.

Oh wait, has anybody heard about what's happening in the Congo lately? 😒

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

the problem is exactly what we see with measles.

  1. children who have no choice are the ones who suffer the consequences
  2. because most vaccines cannot be 100% effective (e.g., I got 3 extra MMR shots and I still don't have detectable measles antibody levels despite being fully immunocompetent), they do rely on herd immunity protecting those who don't mount full responses to the shots.

The thing about public health is that it's public interest over personal choices. In a functioning free society those personal choices would still align with public interest based on the understanding of societal good. So the antagonism is totally artificial.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 19 hours ago

if methanol was so bad, why doesn't the government want you to drink it!?

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 54 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Guess ABC is having briber's remorse and CBS got wise.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

He will never let up on any mainstream media outlet until they are covering the news the way his favorite Conservative Propaganda Machine mouthpieces do.

[–] Sandbag@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, can I have some clarification on this, guess I'm out of the loop.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 30 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

ABC agreed to settle a defamation lawsuit that they could have easily won. Apparently, they thought it would be better to just give Trump money than it would be to piss him off by fighting it.

https://www.npr.org/2024/12/16/nx-s1-5230274/abc-settles-with-trump-for-15-million-now-he-wants-to-sue-other-news-outlets

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

This is the thing that distinguishes the intellect of orbán and trump. Orbán developed what he officially named "the system of national collaboration" with an unofficial motto of "those with us will thrive [and those who are against us will struggle]". So initially they made sure that it was a lucrative thing to align with the system making it very inconvenient for systematic resistance to emerge. Trump seems to be failing this idea already in the acute phase: maintaining pressure even when companies realign with him makes it much more convenient to push back straight up...

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 6 points 19 hours ago

Good for them - in this one particular situation

load more comments
view more: next ›