A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Bring the pain.
The harder the better. Trump won’t stop on his own. The people will need to get pissed and demand change.
Bring the pain.
Target exports from red states. Squeeze those Trump voting mother fuckers until reality slaps them in the face and they squeal like the little facist pricks they are.
Bring the pain.
My God we're all going to starve to death.
Can someone more knowledgeable about politics than me please tell me how 1 person can just slap on tarifs willy-nilly?
Shouldn't things like this have to go through some sort of vote in congress?
Could the US president just call up all CEOs that use steel and be like: "gonna need some donations or I'll put some tarifs on any imported steel"?
Because congress lets him with the IEEPA and the Tarrif Act.
Yes, he could. It would definitely violate a bunch of laws leading to impeachment by Congress (in theory).
https://natlawreview.com/article/can-president-impose-tariffs-without-congressional-approval
2:55 p.m. EST: Relationship with ally has changed: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers CEO
The president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers says Canada’s relationship with a longtime ally and trading partner has fundamentally changed.
Lisa Baiton says without greater global reach for oil and gas exports, Canada has little trade leverage with the United States.
She says Canada urgently needs a policy overhaul that would allow infrastructure projects held back by environmental opposition to move ahead.
Hey Alberta, get fucked. We've all been telling you to diversify your economy for years. We still don't want your fucking pipeline.
Dirty olisands crap is not economically viable to ship across the world. They just want their golden parachute bailout. Fuck them and their bad investment.
It's not like it's impossible - Norway did it.
We tariff you infinity plus one.
But did you triple stamp it?
Oh fuck we forgot to triple stamp it
Trade war with our allies! So much freedom and cost savings.
What are friends for if you can't tax them into enemies??
Btw this is to make Russia our new and exclusive trading partner
Russia doesn’t really produce anything except things U.S. companies export or can easily source elsewhere. And like half of their next generation emigrated or died trying to take 20 more meters of Eastern Ukrainian villages. I don’t expect any great scientific advancements coming anytime soon.
I’m not sure how that trade relationship would even work. Trade deals only work if the private sector is involved and the U.S. private sector doesn’t want Russian products or to investment in a place where there’s no rule of law.
or to investment in a place where there’s no rule of law.
Like USA?
Laugh all you want but this is clearly a top 4d chess move. It's a little early to tell exactly what it is, but it's either the I'm rubber; you're glue gambit, or it could be the neener-neener maneuver. Either way, we should be proud to witness this in our lifetimes.
You're not retaliating, I'm retaliating!
spidermen gif
And this, my friends, are why tariffs are dumb.
Sounds like somebody didn't get their nap today
Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe vowed to cut down barriers on interprovincial trade
Interesting - in the US this isn't allowed, I didn't realize it was a thing in Canada.
The provinces and territories have a lot of power, mandated in our Constitution. Some don't have many trade barriers, while others do.
It's an interesting decision - I'm curious about the pros and cons of that choice. US States have a fair amount of power as well but that one is explicitly excluded in the constitution -- which makes a fair amount of sense to me, though maybe because I'm used to it. I can only imagine what we'd be going through right now if Florida could regulate trade with California.
"Always one more than you!!!"