this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
301 points (96.9% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

4082 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (6 children)

that is just sad. yet so many will say sexism does not exist

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Pretty sure racism is also involved

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Intersectionality

[–] tquid@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's as if, like, if you are a woman, and also in a disfavoured racial category, like, where they, uh, have overlap? Where they meet? It's not the same as either one individually but its own, I guess nexus? I feel like there's a better word for this

[–] Mercival@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's a somewhat niche, but clever word for this particular combo - misogynoir

Coined by Moya Bailey in 2010

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I think it's called a "double minority", but being a woman isn't really a minority tho (edit: not a minority in the context of being 50% of the human population) so I don't know if theres a better term than that.

I feel bad for people who are black, lesbian, neurodivergent, and trans-woman... like that's a quadruple minority.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

but being a woman isn’t really a minority tho

It depends on the context. In a Victoria’s Secret fashion show? Yeah, probably not the minority. In a tech role, which women are systemically harassed and bullied out of pursuing? Yeah, women are probably a minority.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's not what minority means in the sociological context. Volume is mathematical. Poor people are a minority and there's more of them than the 1%. Being a minority is about lack of power, prestige and property. And intersectionality is the more formal term, but 'double minority' gets the point across.

[–] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The term is "intersectionality". Conservatives really hated the term before they went all popeyed over "woke".

[–] marzipan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

but being a woman isn't really a minority tho

They certainly are in computer science

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The funny thing is that in my experience female programmers usually have above average skills. I suspect it’s exactly because of this bias against women in tech. Where an average or below average dude can easily get by, this is much harder for women. As a result this bias acts as a kind of filter which results in female programmers being on average a little better than male programmers because all the average or below average ones get filtered out early.

[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I might add, in the hostile environment women may feel compelled to try harder at least to make a point. As in, "I'll show you what I can do".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is also common in the guitar community. Some women can shred like mofos, and here comes Jim-Bob McGraw saying their playing is tracked etc., ad nauseum

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, online gaming has all but confirmed to me that sexism is very alive and well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was so glad we had a woman join our dev team some months ago. It's more fun, more relaxed and we are able to get better results as we just cover a wider area of skills. People gatekeeping programming to include only men are idiots.

[–] girltwink@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

That poor girl. My gf's only female teammate quit last month and i suggested she start grinding leetcode asap. Could you imagine being the only woman on a team? Pretty strong indicator that something is very wrong there.

It's the same thing with any kind of diversity. Not an expert, but anecdotally, it seems to work better if you start adding diversity at the top. At least people at the senior+ level are generally more comfortable being outliers.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago

If we want to reach parity, there's gotta be some only woman at first.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cubes@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Tbf, the original photo was already discounting her abilities. Saying "can program code" for a lead SWE is saying like "can do calculus" for a physicist.

[–] odium@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

In their defense, maybe the post was written by some journalist with no technical background at all and doesn't know the difference.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BrudderAaron@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

You know what. Good on her. Proud of her doing what she loves. You go girl!

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is some good shit. As a white American male, I say: fuck sexism and racism. You go, girl.

[–] starman@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

can program code

Such a weird sentence

[–] 2ez@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Some fragile male egos in this thread. Looking forward to your complaints about the Barbie movie. Sad and pathetic.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't know what you're talking about. For me the fragile egos are way down the thread, all massively downvoted. The absolute majority is supportive.

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not everybody's sorting by Top, friend. They're probably down there where you say they are though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 3 points 2 years ago

A hello world in MIPS is impressive by itself.

[–] ClarissaXDarjeeling@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I'd be impressed by anyone who could "Hello, world" in MIPS

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Those guys are pathetic

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's annoying sometimes that people just assume that those who don't work in tech are completely clueless about tech.

It's also really funny to mess with people who assumes that.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Am I the only one that doesn't think it's a waste if a gorgeous person does modeling/acting? If I had a body people wanted to ogle I would be using that power 24/7 instead of sitting here in a shitty office under fluorescent lights pretending to care about work while they pretend to care about me.

[–] Enasni@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

She a boss fr

load more comments
view more: next ›