this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)

British Problems

1307 readers
1 users here now

British Problems

Complain about problems only a Brit would understand, the weather, trains, the people on the telly...

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25080087

This has been shining in my eyes for the last 10 minutes whilst the bus driver takes a break.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Has anyone else noticed that energy conservation/limiting never seem to apply to advertising?

Consumers are told to limit their use of energy through a whole host of technologies and initiatives, while ads are becoming ever more visible and energy consuming.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

Reminds me of those LED screens on bus shelters in the hottest part of summer. You can hear the fans inside screaming away trying to keep everything cool.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yup. There's a new massive LED advertising board on the approach to a busy roundabout near me. It's a huge distraction, so bright that even the sun would have to squint.

It doesn't look too bad there, but when it's dark it's a pain in the ar....eyes.

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_action

If the local council won't keep drivers safe, you can. There's only so many times they'll pay to repair it before determining it costs too much.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, there's one on my route to the cinema and you can feel your night vision Getting burnt away.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago

That’s outright dangerous, what moron approved that monstrosity?

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago

Honestly consumers are not told. We are encouraged and the price of energy is the greatest encouragement.

Advertisers have the same encouragement. But their motivation is based on how effective the advertising is to the company.

Its not like anyone is arrested for not reducing use.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not just advertising. Sports field lighting too. The amount of watts stays constant, bulbs get replaced with leds; 24 hour sunlight for the whole town!!

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like the arena in my area that keeps lights on all night (apparently to help the grass grow), while causing shitloads of light pollution. Why are there even regulations for grass quality? A bit of random pitch variance might make football interesting.

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

A bit of random pitch variance might make football interesting

It would require more than that...

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Advertising billboards, despite being led, still use a shit tonne of power.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

About 12% of the same light via older methods.

But you are correct. Old signs rarely used light as the cost was rarely worth it. Now running lights 24/7 that would not be used at. All before. Is an increase in overall use.

Add how much more controllable ot is then past methods. Lighting up a sign on a bus in the 1980s was fairly useless. The viewability would be lower. But with LEDs it is practicle. Dospite the fact that bis is useing more diesel (most buses are still diesel) to travel that same distance as it did before the signage.

Its hardly suprising when cost is the only motivation used.

But unfortunatly few pitential customers are going to refuse the company because there advertising is not considering overall power use.