this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
512 points (96.5% liked)

Not The Onion

13186 readers
906 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, so he admits that it is virtuous!

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Mark Zuckerberg is a dork.

[–] pfr@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

I quit Facebook and Instagram years ago, long before it was called Meta. Fuck that goon.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago

He whines, signalling his "virtues"

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

What Mark is really saying you will be back. if anyone is still on Facebook after all these years he is probably right. He also knows if anything that does take it out. He will just buy it up and once again those people will be back under meta's control. He has too much money. The only answer is to stop using identity based social media.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

That's the beauty of the fediverse. It cannot be bought anymore than someone can buy "the internet".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

lol

Eat turds Zuck

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Suck my French-canadian balls Mark. Actually nevermind, just get fucked .

[–] Noedel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

He'll zuck em

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Well then I'm virtue signalling, fuckface. I deleted all the Meta platforms I used, save for my fake white supremacist Facebook account because I use that to tell the employers of Nazis that a Nazi works for them. I am done with my personal accounts though.

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

ROFL I’m signaling the virtue of my privacy kept safe by escaping Meta and not being on a platform hosted by a deranged billionaire. 🤣

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

Even if they are, they still have fucking virtues, unlike your robotic ass, Zuck.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

watson387 says Mark Zuckerberg can 'go fuck himself'.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, now tell me the problem with that

[–] nick@midwest.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

Someone needs to contraption this fucking guy asap

[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Man, Zuck the cuck Fuckerberg is really virtue signalling saying something like that damn

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, we are. You are still losing users.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I quit facebook during the obama administration lol

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

You know, some people actually try to be good people.

Fuckerberg.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I never understood that phrase. If you admit there is virtue to your opponents actions isn't that just certifying you are wrong regardless of the opponents intentions?

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, it's saying they're doing something mostly superficial and useless because they think it will make people see them as virtuous, where they wouldn't have done it if it wasn't a highly visible act, not that the actions are actually virtuous. So like someone volunteers for one day for some charitable cause, but spends the whole time taking selfies and not actually helping much.

That said I'm not sure what the logic is that quitting facebook counts as this

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Alright but the highly superficial act is seen as virtuous. The act we oppose when we use this phrase. That act. It is virtuous. Therefor we in this hypothetical stand against virtue and goodness.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

It generally means that we don't believe they'd be taking that action if there weren't a camera rolling or trending hashtag to follow. It's not criticizing the actual action, but the context around the action.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not sure if this headline meets the criteria for not the onion.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›