this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
184 points (95.1% liked)

PC Gaming

14710 readers
350 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm not a fan of Win 7/8 being called "ancient"

[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The tech industry moves fast. Win 7/8 are ancient in tech terms

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tell that to the MS Dos PCs I regularly have to maintain and provide safety to. They still live.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Something can be ancient and still function for purpose. We've uncovered ancient pottery intact.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something that came out last week can be considered ancient in tech terms.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Windows 7 is 15 years old. If it was a person it would be able to get a learners permit to drive in many states.

It's also been EOL for over 4 years.

[–] falidorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

We don’t call 15 year old cars ancient. Blu rays aren’t ancient. CDs aren’t ancient. Tons of things are 15 years old and fallen out of general use but aren’t considered ancient.

I’d argue that XP is ancient but not Win7.

[–] colderr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Blu rays and CDs are considered ancient. Considering all the storage we have now, something like a CD is close to worthless for almost everyone. Blu rays could have their own niche still, but it's still considered ancient by modern standards. Technology evolves so fast, and it's hard to keep up.

[–] falidorn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I call shenanigans. Blu rays still make up most of physical sales and that video quality makes up the most consumed resolution.

I can kinda see the argument for CDs but they are still sold new in big name B&M stores. “Close to worthless” is hyperbole at the very least.

[–] colderr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Just because they are still sold doesn't mean that they are not ancient.

You can still buy, for example, a GT 1030, which, compared to more modern graphics cards, is considered ancient.

Just because something is still being sold or bought doesn't mean that it's not ancient.

Blu rays still make up most of physical sales

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KACt6YhOyY

Cars have an expected lifespan of like 20 years, operating systems don't.

Windows 7 came out with very early support for efi boot which took explicit effort to get to work. At this point most OEM machines out there don't even support the legacy booting mode. That is ancient by tech standards.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Windows 7 is as old now as Windows 3.5 was when Windows 7 released.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When Win7 reached EOL we were using Linux 5.4

That's pretty ancient.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

But the kernel going 3.11 and not stopping at 3.10 was just yesterday... merely 10 years ago.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago

Sytems that don't receive security patches anymore well deserve that title. You'd hardly keep it airgapped if you care about Steam updates.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In computer time, it is pretty ancient.

"This could take like hundreds of nanoseconds... It could even take one. Whole. Second! 😱" - Enzo Matrix, Reboot

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What value is there to using windows 7 nowadays. I genuinely don't understand

[–] superkret@feddit.org 14 points 2 years ago

It's the last Windows that could look this comfy:

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago
[–] gingernate@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ancient! What does that make me!?

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] sleet01@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Starting to see an absolute flood of those. A literal deluge!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 2 years ago

a Cosmic Horror

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The ancestors. According to the new gen we are the ancestors.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Ancient... ME is ancient, XP is old, 7 is almost old (you still see it here and there).

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

I'm not ancient, you are ancient!

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s time to install Nobara on those machines.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Personally, I dislike that Nobara is relying on patched Mesa and kernel versions. This is unnecessary risk of instability. AFAIK Bazzite doesn't do that.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

There wasn't even a DOS 5 version of Steam ☹️

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Friendly Reminder: You can install any KDE based Linux distribution and probably have an equivalent or better experience with security and regular steam updates.

Compatibility isn't really an excuse in this case, as Windows 7/8 will no longer be compatible with the most troubling games anyway. You'd be best off on a modern system with proper security patches.

load more comments
view more: next ›