this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
658 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

19614 readers
2277 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll tip my hat to the new Constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again

Yeah
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 41 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Small gov't is usually a lie anyway. It's a smokescreen for "actually we're still going to tell you what to do."

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They strip away everything that actually helps people, so in that way it's really small.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

So small it'll fit in your vagina.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

They compartmentalize accountability. It's easy to say it's some other guy. Then he gets fired, replaced and fights for the chance to have it happen again.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It’s small because they have zero oversight and they only need to worry about one party. Hurray!

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The smallest government is a dictatorship.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Small dick tater

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Oh and their idea of small government is letting the rich stomp on you while police tanks roll though the streets mowing down anyone who doesn't bow to them.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And also way more expensive than big government

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 10 months ago

Well of course, it's about less taxes for the rich not less taxes. It's ok, all that wealth is gonna trickle down any time now.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

If government is actually the top power on the land with oversight over and the power to rule over everything, then the power of voters which choses the people who lead said government controls the top power on the land, which is what's known as Democracy (even when imperfect).

However if government ties its own hands so that it doesn't really oversee or rule over the domains were Money has the most power, then it's not the top power on the land anymore - Money is - and the votes of people do not control the highest power on the land anymore, they only control a secondary power, so what you have in not Democracy anymore, it's Oligarchy - Money is not democratic since doesn't have any "one person one vote" rule and instead some have billions of times more power than others.

"Small government" is really just a slogan for a government which has had its hands tied by reducing its funding so that it's unable to oversee, much less rule over, the areas where Money dominates, especially when it comes to facing the wealthiest people and companies. Mind you this only works if the other elements of Democracy are kept, so Money still wants a Judiciary and Law Enforcement independent of Government to uphold their ownership of things and stop the plebes from taking their shit, just a government weakenned in all other areas and unable to fight Money in the Courts.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

and by continuing to give the people the right to vote adds a veil of legitimacy to the power of the government so there is less of a chance of a uprising.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

which is what’s known as Democracy

Just because it's "known" as "democracy" because politicians and their crony media capitalists have been throwing the word around for a few centuries doesn't actually make it democracy.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, Money de facto ruling over massive domains in a country, including access to life essentials, is the very opposite of Democracy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If these Republican idiots actually believed in small government, they'd be Libertarians.

They'd still be idiots, but they'd be Libertarians.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Both love big gov, just slight differences in which wars they want to support and which industries will get government funding.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If Libertarians were libertarians, they'd oppose the Taft-Hartley Act.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If libertarians were libertarians, they'd know what the Taft-Hartley Act is... and maybe, who Taft and... Hartley are to begin with, but only if we're being really optimistic.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Republicans want tyranny, not small government.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 12 points 10 months ago

Government so small it fits not only within your bedroom, but within your uterus!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Me when "small government" supporters don't start by defunding the police

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's never "small government" when it comes to funding pig.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Fuck the poor, fuck the old, fuck the environment, fuck soldiers and veterans, fuck the sick, fuck food safety...

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

"small government"

As long as you're a Cis white Christian male that didn't go to college

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There are people who, disturbed by "big government" today and its tendency to curb the advantages they might gain if their competitiveness were allowed free flow, demand "less govern- ment." Alas, there is no such thing as less government, merely changes in government. If the libertarians had their way, the distant bureaucracy would vanish and the local bully would be in charge. Personally, I prefer the distant bureaucracy, which may not find me, over the local bully, who certainly will. And all historical precedent shows a change to localism to be for the worse.

—Isaac Asimov, Nice Guys Finish First, collected in The Sun Shines Bright, 1981

[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Surely small Government means repealing all that red tape enforcing individual property rights too?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Pick up my guitar and play

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Updoots for use of "go on, get!".

There's a new improved version being pushed now which introduces itself by saying "fuck everyone except the incredibly wealthy".

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Reagan small government except it's inescapable public debt forever