746
"Necessary" (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mikrochip@feddit.org 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make"

Why do we only seem to get the bad outlandish things from books and movies? :/

Honestly, aggressive climate change would have a similar short-term impact, even if the net result is good, which is a large part of the reason we don't do aggressive changes like this.

That said, I'm not convinced the net result is good, so we'll instead have short-term suffering followed by longer-term suffering, all for a bit of protectionism for American businesses (which will probably leave them worse off in the long run anyway).

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 day ago
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

That graph is interesting. When was Reagan president again...?

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

When was Reagan president again…?

Nailed it.

81-89. I don't think Reagan's presidency or party really explains it, because we see it rise shortly and then fall, both during Bill Clinton's presidency (93-2001). So George H.W. Bush raised taxes during his term, and then Clinton cut them again, but did so while balancing the budget (Clinton ran a surplus).

Reagan certainly slashed taxes, but so did Clinton, and to a similar degree.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

So where are the "Republicans are good for the economy" voters now?

[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Anyone that actually cares about the economy would see that every time the republicans get in they fuck it, and every time the democrats get in they fix it.

But they don't care about reality, only their feelings

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 41 points 1 day ago

Necessary for Elon and trump to evade prison sentences.

These shitbags are trading the health of the majority to evade repercussions for their crimes (of which there are many).

Drone strike please.

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's necessary for me not to have TSLAs price tank and the Saudis take recover loss out of me, pound-of-flesh style.

Or, probably how he's guilty of a ton of ITAR violations related to Saudis, SpaceX rockets, plus Russia and Starlink

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 174 points 2 days ago

Wait till he hears how necessary it is for life to get harder for billionaires.

[-] Breve@pawb.social 113 points 2 days ago

That's why they're trying to take power. Billionaires would rather destroy the world and drive all life to extinction than to give up their private jets and yachts.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago

just wait till they outlaw protests and impose curfews

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Frittiert@feddit.org 31 points 2 days ago

The French found a solution some time ago, maybe history really repeats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

The worst part is--it's really not. These guys could all stay millionaires and we could still solve our system's worst distribution issues. Their biggest hardship could be dealing with not being The Guy With The Biggest Number when they go to their rich guy parties.

Personally I'm in favor of making them destitute and/or imprisoning them, but going that far really isn't strictly necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

There is no middle class. There are workers and owners. If you own real estate and stonks you are still a worker unless you can live off of just investments. This is designed to corrupt and neuter you. You have enough skin in the game of the owners to not want to oppose them, but not enough to actually be them. Unless you hope to retire, at which point you make the transition from working class to owning class, but only at the end of your life, if you even make it that far, and often owning very little.

[-] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

This is why Worker and Consumer Cooperatives are so vital.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Godort@lemm.ee 144 points 2 days ago

necessary for what?

necessary for what, motherfucker?

Protectionism. Musk stands to gain a ton if there's less competition from imported EVs, and that's true for a lot of other products that American companies make. If you can just throw a few million at a presidential campaign and essentially guarantee your competitors will have a 10-60% disadvantage, those few millions can turn into billions in profit.

On paper, the goal seems to be to spur companies to return to the US, but I think the net impact will be higher prices for Americans and reduced trade w/ other countries due to retaliatory tariffs.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Your comment has the same energy as "states' rights to do what?", and I'm here for it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

For a complete fascist takeover.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shut up, shut up, shut up please just shtfu already elon. How are people like him and bezos controlling the world? I swear we celebrate and praise mediocre morons in the US.

As a nation we have lost 30 years of progress because we the loudest most idiotic people to ever live a platform to spew their collective nonsense. Take me back to 2010 where the internet was still fun and not just some massive propaganda machine for the uber wealthy and political nut jobs

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago

How are people like him and bezos controlling the world?

Capitalism

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago

But without capitalism we wouldn't have (insert something that has nothing to do with capitalism but that I completely attribute to it). And that would mean no trade.

My ancestors wouldnt have pushed at least one Southern plantation owner to suicide.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

In trump's case, we praise exceptional morons

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago

The fucking gall this billionaire POS has to utter the phrase "live within our means."

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 31 points 1 day ago

Fascist cunt

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 52 points 2 days ago

Add this to the news that Mike Johnson said they will end Obamacare and I can't believe anyone would vote for Trump. He's going to raise your costs, reduce government services, kill healthcare as we know it, the list goes on and on.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

They literally want to end government. Aka, services for anyone who isn't wealthy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Glifted@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

🗡️🫨

... there's no guillotine emojis yet

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

Trump is better at this than Musk...

It will be a beautiful necessary. Everyone will love the carnage. We will destroy America bigly. Like never before. The radical left democrats will hate it, but it will be glorious. Trust me.

[-] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 1 day ago

“Some of you may die, but that is a risk I am willing to make”

When can we feed Elon to a dragon?

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

What's up with upper class trying to destroy middle class all the time? Are middle class a threat to them? Has to be, otherwise this wouldn't matter.

Make things hard for billionaires and spread their wealth amongst the lower class to start evening shit out. Who tf needs almost a trillion unspendable dollars?

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

There's no such thing as the middle class. You either own means of production, you sell your labour to those who do, or you belong to the criminal class that doesn't contribute to the growth of capital. The middle class is a fairy tale capitalists tell us to keep us in the labour class instead of the far more sensible criminal class.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

its only "necessary" so him and his ilk can continue to bleed the nation dry

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago

Electively suffering hardship? Billionaires first, set a good example for the rest of us, and the hardship can trickle down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

I wonder if when he says "necessary" he's referring to some longtermism weird BS.

I mean, he's definitely referring to some weird BS. But I wonder whether specifically it's longtermism BS.

I only heard the clip from here.. but it sounded like he said for long term prosperity, not necessary.

I assume what he was saying is that people will suffer while we force the market to move into isolation.

What he doesn't want to admit to the populous is that to have long term benefits of cheap labor, you have to have cheap labor.

So either you have that by being richer than other countries and outsourcing the labor, or isolating the country and subjugating a portion of the population so much that they are the cheap labor. That portion... Isn't going to be small if it's going to be able to provide everything for the rich who blast through resources like crazy.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

I read recently "On Freedom" by Timothy Snyder and he mentions that. Billionaires are sucking or wealth and when we suffer, we are told that this is temporary and toward a greater good (which never comes).

Sadly it is successful and a lot of Americans believe that.

It opened my eyes seeing how we are set up to fight each other (blaming minorities) while oligarchs are making our lives more miserable by hoarding country's wealth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Bitch, we're already going through hardship. How much more hardship do we need to go through just so you can keep your power trip going?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 23 points 2 days ago

Bro we couldn't even get people to wear masks and get free tests and vaccines without triggering white outrage, how you think actual financial hardship is going to go over with these people?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
746 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5034 readers
931 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS