Passport-less clearance fully available at Changi Airport, average clearance time of 10 seconds: ICA (www.straitstimes.com)

submitted 1 week ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago

Don't blink! No smile! No hats! Place your fingers on the scanner!

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 week ago

I mean, the tech is cool, but has terrifying implications.

[-] pycorax@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Eh this is nothing new since the biometrics portion has been part of the process for a few years. The only new part is that now you can skip the passport. The terrifying portion had already arrived many years ago unfortunately.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Holy fuck, hard pass.

[-] Meltrax@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Have you flown international lately? This is what it looks like to land in the international terminal in most major US airports as well.

[+] moe90@feddit.nl -30 points 1 week ago

then you don't need to come to Singapore. their country their rules

[-] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I really dislike this argument. Just because it's "their country, their rules" doesn't not make it an issue? Especially when it comes to privacy concerns. Privacy concerns are universal. There are a plethora of serious issues that are not defended by "national sovereignty". If that was the case we should just turn a blind eye to North Korea, right?

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unfortunately this has always been the case with other country's rules. I'm not a fan of US gun culture, but I'm not American, so I don't get a vote.

Nobody is forcing you to visit either Singapore or North Korea.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I mean, North Koreans did kidnap people from abroad, so technically...

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

True. But if that happened to you involuntary data violations would be the least of your problems.

[-] moe90@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

I think this kind of biometric immigration verification will come to many countries eventually. Like UK, Japan and USA already tested this kind of procedure and Singapore is just one step ahead with this full implementation. So, we just can't avoid it. If this kind of verification concerns you a lot just don't travel abroad.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Singapore isn't one step ahead, it's full-on surveillance state.

The implications here are that if you go through this process, then these biometrics will bought and sold throughout the world. You'll be tracked absolutely everywhere.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

biometrics will bought and sold throughout the world. You'll be tracked absolutely everywhere.

But it is the same if you have a regular (non-anonymous) social media account.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

Social media is a privacy concern as well, but this is clearly on another level. I don't save my biometric data on twitter. I don't need facebook to live a full life. And as you said, there are anonymous alternatives. There aren't when you travel. And living without travelling at least a little bit is kind of sad. So the comparison doesn't fit.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago

this is clearly on another level.

No. It is just other people who are using your data.

I don't save my biometric data on twitter.

You seem to have no idea what everybody is doing with all the data that you have posted.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

If you think Musk has your fingerprints because you tweeted about the last restaurant you ate, we clearly have no common sense of reality and should leave the discussion at that

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

You can choose not to use social media... the choice is way harder for avoiding plane travel unless you can afford the time and money to use other means, which most people don't.

[-] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah it's for sure an issue in the rest of the world too. Not discounting that

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It is the standard means of passport control in Europe and UK, just with the passport added, but all by machine. Once they are convinced the biometrics are good enough they'll do this too to speed things up.

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

At the moment it sounds optional, so that’s a plus.

Also:

The previous average clearance time for each traveller was 25 seconds, said ICA.

So, 15s saved per person. Which is handy, but 25 seconds fits squarely in the “blazing fast” category anyway.

Bet the people will spend more than 15s per person dealing with the ramifications of their biometric data getting leaked and used against them later though.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Agreed with the privacy concerns but

So, 15s saved per person. Which is handy, but 25 seconds fits squarely in the “blazing fast” category anyway.

This is huge when there are five 787s worth of people in line for ten passport control machines, it's the difference between waiting half an hour in line or five minutes.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

This is huge when there are five 787s worth of people in line for ten passport control machines

Perhaps more passport control instead of more invasiveness?

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, I agree

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

you know, half an hour is really not that much. I would easily choose that

[-] moe90@feddit.nl -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was there on transit hall couple of months ago and on the arrival hall everything is paperless already and all the paperwork can be done via phone or tablet. EDIT: as long as your device have a proper modern web browser. everything can be done easily.

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Paperless doesn’t necessarily require biometric data… still, I’ll just skip Singapore.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

So you're just giving up any personal freedom to save some time. If you're cool with that, alright. Some people aren't though.

None of this tech is 100% accurate either. You could be passing through and get inferences that peg you as an international drug lord that ends up in prison or worse.

[-] moe90@feddit.nl -3 points 1 week ago

I am not said I am fine with it. But, if you don't want to comply with their requirement. you can't enter their country and I am sure this kind of paperless and biometric immigration check will come to many countries (UK, USA, Japan, Canada already tested it) and it is inevitable. the only workaround atm is just don't travel abroad.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I mean, yeah I don't need to go to Singapore.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 29 points 1 week ago

Singapore, or as William Gibson called it, Disneyland With The Death Penalty.

[-] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Isn't that just Disney Land?

[-] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 week ago

Hell no. I want passport, no biometric facial recognition.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024

78 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59020 readers

2790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS