43
submitted 2 weeks ago by boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net to c/linux@lemmy.ml

You know, immutable enterprise systems.

I installed HeliumOS (Almalinux bootc) on a corebooted Chromebook. Works really well, but audio needs to be configured.

The script needs a recent python which is not available there.

Go and rust can be installed for a user only. Is there something similar for python?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] undrivendev@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago
[-] charolastra@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Plus one for pyenv

[-] ziddey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps overkill for your use case, but uv is pretty great. I suppose you could just use it to install a local python and then add it to your path.

[-] merk@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

This was going to be my recommendation as well.

[-] liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

You might consider trying Miniconda, a version of Anaconda. It installs a local python environment of your choosing at a user level. https://docs.anaconda.com/miniconda/

[-] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I prefer Micromamba since it's faster at solving environments.

[-] GiveOver@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

You can also set the solver to use libmamba if you've already installed miniconda

[-] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

I Gave it a try on macOS a few days ago because brew and python is a dependencie hell and way to much workarounds to make some scripts to work properly when specific versions of packages are needed...

Miniconda actually made it work fine, without to much hassle. I'm kinda impressed.

[-] atempuser23@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

You can install the new version of python but leave the system default python as is. You can launch a specific version of python by adding the version number

So python3.12 vs just python3

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you can install nix (you can install it per user) then you can have whatever you want in a temporary shell with nix-shell -p python

nix profile install nixpkgs#python if you want it actually installed

Home manager is also entirely user level I believe and lets you use a declarative config too

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Home-manager > nix profile

Also, nix-shell is supposed to be used for debugging, and nix shell/run/develop for using packages without installing them

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Does home manager work standalone without having nix first? I've never installed it on non-nixos

Nix shell is absolutely for running packages without installing them it literally tells you to do that in the terminal hint

Nix run iirc only works with flakes

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, it builds on top of nix. But it seems like the only real option for declarative package management.

Nix shell and nix-shell are different commands

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-shell-nix-shell-and-nix-develop/25964/4

Nix run iirc only works with flakes

So does nix shell

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

nix shell -p works without flakes enabled

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago
$ nix shell -p python
error: unrecognised flag '-p'
Try 'nix --help' for more information.
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sorry I meant nix-shell -p, I didn't read your original comment properly apparently

It's definitely an option as op wants to run one script from the sounds of it, nix-shell not nix shell is perfect for that

It's a bit needlessly confusing that there are two entirely separate commands with the same name and thought you were talking about the original one

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Source on the second statement? My understanding was that nix-shell is legacy for systems without flakes and nix-command enabled, and are being replaced by nix shell/run/develop

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting, didn't know the history of the command. But that post confirms my understanding, that nix shell/develop are the new replacements for nix-shell, with nix shell for temporary package installs and nix develop for debugging and developing

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

As far as I understand, they're not replacements in the same way nix profile replaces nix-env. They seem to serve a different purpose, but I don't know enough to say for certain.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

of course they're not a drop-in replacement, as the cli is getting a major redesign, but as per your source

nix shell and nix develop are still experimental, so nix-shell is sticking around despite doing the same thing

it seems like they are made to fulfill the same purpose

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

I tried to get install instructions for home-manager and they only had them if you are already on nix?

I didnt get it

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'd try installing just regular nix (package manager, not operating system) rather than home manager, that's what I do on by Debian pi

There's an install script on their website that does it all for you

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nice! Yes I will do that. What is the difference between the 2?

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Careful, there's three different terms in the mix here:

NixOS: an entire operating system, you don't need this.

nix: the nix package manager. This is what you'll need to install. look for single user install in the instructions.

home-manager: a module for nix. It's aim is to allow declarative configuration of a users' home configuration (and allow easier per-user install of packages on a global nix install).

If you want to go down the nix route, which I would recommend if you enjoy tinkering and having fine control over your system, you should start with installing nix. With that, you can already setup a shell that has the newest version of python available.

Going beyond that, I can link you some more resources, if you want c:

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

So "nix install" means placing a nix binary somewhere in my user $PATH?

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Can you use pyenv for the script?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

You should be able to have multiple versions with an environment manager, maybe customize your shell profile to alias python to the one you want and the other users can alias to the one they want. I’m sure there’s a better way, but I strongly dislike python every time I try to learn it because Perl was the first language I learned, ruining me for strongly opinionated languages.

[-] SuittuRotta@social.vivaldi.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

@boredsquirrel
One solution could be to install uv for a single user, and use that to install and run a Python interpreter.

https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/

[-] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Compile it, install it to your ~/bin.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

~/.local/bin ;)

But yes, great idea.

I found a script online that installed the tar archive. For some reason that version of python still wasnt used, and invoking it with python3.12.6 or something didnt do anything

[-] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe a tooling manager like mise or asdf.

[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Have you considered using pipx + poetry?

[-] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Audio configuration sounds like a shell task. Why does it need Python? Is this script in any way an official part of the OS?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can you put it in the ~/bin or something and modify the $path to go there first?

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

~/.local/bin you mean?

;)

Yes I tried that, and got like 6 different solutions to do this so I will see :)

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes . Local/bin, good looking out.

Does your which program name report the right one?

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not yet fixed, no motivation

I currently use this workaround ;)

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Tbh I would probably never fix it if that worked. What’s a little dongle between friends.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48035 readers
730 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS