UnfortunateShort

joined 3 years ago
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

And then AI says the should reduce emissions and they order some engineers to fix that clearly broken model 🙄

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I have no idea how people like no. 1 better, but you do you

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Entschuldigen Sie, aber bei dem bekannten Reaktionsbild handelt es sich eigentlich um eine Maus und keine Ratte. Es ist mir dringendes Anliegen diesen fatalen Irrtum aufzuklären.

I will only refer to it as 'The Great Plague' from now on. Kids will think we went through some biblical event

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, you are not telling me you use a single 3 layer piece to wipe, are you?

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is there any specific kind, one might call it genre even, you want to avoid? It is important to build knowledge here, otherwise you won't know all the stuff what one should avoid!

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

They don't have any monopoly. There are plenty alternatives and all are trash.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Just remember: Rule 34 exists for a reason.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Living good and ethically sound is a best-effort kind of thing these days

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Normal people: I'll just subscribe to stuff I want to see

This guy: I'll build my own frontend and shadowban everything I hate - down to individual users I had even just one slightly unpleasant interaction with - for all its users 😡

Wth man. The thing instantly became a meme. Say 'whoopsy haha', make the banlist optional or remove it and tomorrow nobody gives a shit anymore...

I don't get people DMing the dev either tho. Especially stuff like death threats (if that is even true) because of random BS like this. It is one frontend for Lemmy. Surely one can do without it.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the protocol was developed in-house and only the code is open source? I think the protocol itself is not public to make it harder to spot, since its whole purpose is to dodge deep packet inspection

 

Ich will nicht lügen, käme es nicht von Fritz, würde es mich vielleicht auch scharf machen

 
 

/s

 
 
 
 

Endlich mal fickend qualitative Nachrichten.

Zwei Katzen haben in Bremerhaven einen Einsatz der Polizei und Feuerwehr ausgelöst. Wie die Beamten mitteilten, alarmierten Anwohner eines Mehrfamilienhauses in der Nacht zu Mittwoch die Einsatzkräfte, weil laute Geräusche aus der Nachbarwohnung sie um den Schlaf brachten. Vor Ort öffnete den Angaben zufolge niemand die Tür, so dass die Feuerwehr sie aufbrechen musste. In der Wohnung fanden die Polizisten aber keine Menschen - sondern zwei Katzen, die es offenbar geschafft hatten, den Staubsauger einzuschalten. Die Beamten schalteten den Staubsauger aus und "ermahnten die beiden Vierbeiner mündlich, sich für den Rest der Nacht ruhig zu verhalten", so die Polizei weiter.

 
 

Hey, so I have brand new HDDs I intend to put in a btrfs software RAID. They're Seagate ST4000VX016-3CV104 4TB Skyhawks. Workload is basically write and forget, I will probably never delete a thing.

However I decided to test them first and noticed that after writing about 160 GB, some SMART counters have gone up significantly. Read error rate went from 6.632 to 90.238.872 for example (seemingly all correct by hardware ECC), seek error rate from 143 to 87.661.

Am I reading things correctly? This does not seem like the way healthy drives should behave, does it? It similar on all of them tho. Are they just trash-tier drives they somehow got to work with ECC?

view more: next ›