95

I find it odd that when filling out a form that asked me what my religion is one of the choices is Atheist.

What now? That is the that opposite of religion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 87 points 2 weeks ago

Atheism is a religion the same way bald is a hair color.

[-] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

I told a religious buddy of mine that atheism is a religion the same way "off" is a TV channel. He struggled to comprehend how that's even possible lol

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 18 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks; I'm stealing that!

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Philosophically, that's true. But I understand putting it in the religion column for the purpose of statistics. And 'none' and 'atheist' are two different possible answers. You can have no religion but believe very fervently in a god of your own conception.

[-] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

That sounds more like "Other" than "None".

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why? If you worship a god but don't subscribe to any dogma, accept any scripture or listen to any religious authority, you have no religion. You're just a theist.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why? If you worship a god but don’t subscribe to any dogma, accept any scripture or listen to any religious authority, you have no religion. You’re just a theist.

~~Except atheism is literally a lack of belief in a god or deity. If you believe in some type of deity, you're not an atheist. by default.~~ Edit: I missread that. Sorry. Too much coffee and not enough sleep can cause halicuinations

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That was my point.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I suspect Satanists and others on the left hand path would disagree but I agree you're functionally correct

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

I guess it depends on your definition of religion. To me, it sounds like a personal religion, even if just one person believes in it. There are any number of religions too small to be included in their list, probably, so they should have an "Other" option, and that seems like the best fit for someone who has a personal set of religious beliefs that do not align with a listed religion.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Or you could just keep it how it's always been for the purposes of easy tabulation.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago

I like the idea of putting “none.” I’m gonna start doing that instead of atheist.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Atheism is not a religion or worldview.

Atheism is the lack of a belief in a god or God's.

Many atheists including myself adhere to the statement of simply being unconvinced that there is a God or having no credible evidence to indicate a God's existence.

Maybe the form we were filling out legitimately needed that information but typically outside of a very specific set of data. I don't see why any form would ever ask you what your religion or lack of religion might be.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago

Atheist is tangential to religion, you have religious theists or atheists as religion is about a system of philosophy and ethics while theism is about belief in gods.

Irreligious, 'none' or 'does not apply' might be better.

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I appreciate the surveys that just say "doesn't apply".

[-] echo@lemmings.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Atheist is not a statement about your religion at all. I'm also an atheist and my 'religion' is basically secular humanist. Yours could be none, Unitarian Universalist, Buddhist, secular humanist, or any others that are compatible.

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

I don't intend this to be harsh or negative but I don't know how to phrase this nicely;

Secular Humanism is a philosophy, not a religion. Religions are faith-based while philosophies are based in some logical argumentation. The muddling of religion with philosophy linguistically serves only to tarnish philosophy and lend undue credence to religion. That language is so flexible can be beneficial but it can equally be detrimental when used like this.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, I just read about secular humanism, and it seems to be pretty much exactly how I feel about things. The human race could, through science, understanding, and cooperation, solve most of the problems that we are faced with. I like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Just put Pastafarianism

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Depends if you define religion as 'act of worship', or 'belief aystem', I guess. Bhuddism would fail the first, but not the second.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

its because if it was just none christians would count it as people who are just undecided and haven't accepted jesus.

[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago

Same. Goes to show how much thought and care has been put into it.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

The closest I have to religion is naturalist, which is to say based on the data I have, I can't find any evidence anywhere of supernatural effects, and while I haven't personally done the looking, the scientific consensus is that there's nothing, even when it comes to religious investigators actively looking for evidence of the stuff they expect to see.

To date, there are some pretty high bounties on evidence of various kinds of spooky shit that remain unclaimed.

Of course, I don't know this to be the case. The simulation hypothesis has not been ruled out, which would allow for effects we cannot detect. It doesn't stop me from worshiping my cat. (Cat-huffing. It's a thing.) And it raises questions whether we are the same person when we wake up after non-REM sleep, or a new iteration of the identity. (The transporter paradox). But so far, the most likely explanation is we're material girls living in a material world.

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

In my opinion, if somebody states that there's something spooky going on, then the onus is on them to provide evidence and prove what they're saying. I don't have to do anything.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

"isn't it spooky how all the evidence just ups and dissapppears when you look at it?!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Don't we have spooky quarks? I know we have strange ones, and charm quarks... Feels like we should have spooky quarks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Atheism is a choice; where I choose evidence and logic.

To me it is basically:

I don't believe in your imaginary friend; but don't feel special, I don't believe in anyone else's imaginary friend either.

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I once told somebody that if you want to believe in a magic man in the sky, then go for it, but don't expect me to.

[-] Grogon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

In my country we have "Konfessionslos" -> non-denominational.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Non-denominational is still religious/spiritual here, like Christians that aren't affiliated with a specific church.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Since 'atheism' means 'without religion' it's the same as putting in "none."

imho

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

There are different categories. I consider myself agnostic atheist. That pretty much means I don't really know, but all this man made stuff is horse shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
95 points (93.6% liked)

Atheism

3984 readers
3 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS