149
submitted 1 year ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Nasa's James Webb Space Telescope may have discovered tentative evidence of a sign of life on a faraway planet.

It may have detected a molecule called dimethyl sulphide (DMS). On Earth, at least, this is only produced by life.

The researchers stress that the detection on the planet 120 light years away is "not robust" and more data is needed to confirm its presence.

Researchers have also detected methane and CO2 in the planet's atmosphere.

Detection of these gases could mean the planet, named K2-18b, has a water ocean.

Prof Nikku Madhusudhan, of the University of Cambridge, who led the research, told BBC News that his entire team were ''shocked'' when they saw the results.

"On Earth, DMS is only produced by life. The bulk of it in Earth's atmosphere is emitted from phytoplankton in marine environments," he said.

But Prof Madhusudhan described the detection of DMS as tentative and said that more data would be needed to confirm its presence. Those results are expected in a year.

''If confirmed, it would be a huge deal and I feel a responsibility to get this right if we are making such a big claim.''

It is the first time astronomers have detected the possibility of DMS in a planet orbiting a distant star.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 year ago

Heck even if they don't find life it'll be interesting to find out how dimethyl sulphide might be getting produced there

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Fuck_u_spez_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't mean to brag, but I naturally produce sulphides in high concentrations after I eat lots of broccoli.

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago

JWST is able to analyse the light that passes through the faraway planet's atmosphere. That light contains the chemical signature of molecules in its atmosphere. The details can be deciphered by splitting the light into its constituent frequencies - rather like a prism creating a rainbow spectrum. If parts of the resulting spectrum are missing, it has been absorbed by chemicals in the planet's atmosphere, enabling researchers to discover its composition.

That is pretty wild.

[-] EonNShadow@pawb.social 21 points 1 year ago

Spectroscopy is a really interesting tool

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

If it's confirmed, it will be the biggest news in history.

[-] TylerDurdenJunior@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think it'll at least deserve a gold star, not silver.

[-] Tatters@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Sadly, I think you overestimate the general interest there would be in such an announcement. Also, it is not as though we will be getting images of little green aliens, any evidence will be far more circumstantial, tentative and over many years. It will be hard to sustain any public excitement for that long.

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both of you are right. The general public will give this a passing interest at best since it's not roswell greys or some shit... but this would still be the biggest news in history if confirmed. As far as "big scientific questions still unanswered" goes, actual confirmation of extraterrestrial life existing is only 1 tier of holy-shitness down, imo, from things like fully understanding consciousness or dark matter.

For most of history humanity thought we were alone, and even now(or till now if this is confirmed I guess) the "official" stance is still only "there's no evidence but the universe is so incomprehensibly large there probably is something, y'know, somewhere. Maybe."

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

“Possible microbial life hundreds of light years away” isn’t nearly as fun as “They’re here and they have infinite energy devices.”

[-] xts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Don’t think we’ll ever be able to “confirm” it the same way we can confirm if there’s/was life on Mars, Venus, Europa, etc.

It’s just too far away

[-] NanoooK@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

JWST has only operated for less than 2 years and already provides so much data. I can't wait for more discoveries.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The coolest part is the things it’s now opening time on the Hubble up for.

Like.

JWST is no doubt amazing, but let’s not discount the amazing data Hubble is still churning out…. Because everyone wants the best.

[-] untrainedtribble@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Too bad it’s 9 times the size of the earth (I don’t know what it’s mass is) so likely not suitable for humans. Still finding life outside earth would be absolutely incredible, and I agree, the most historic discovery of humankind

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We did it fellas. We found the space fart.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I tried Googling and found nothing. Does anyone know if DMS has been detected on Europa or Ganymede?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think we would have heard about it.

[-] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think they foud it in Venus' atmosphere a year or so ago.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The was Phosphine

[-] Tetra@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm assuming even there is some on an icy moon of the solar system, since they don't have an atmosphere we can't detect it as easily.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
149 points (95.7% liked)

News

23260 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS