this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
190 points (99.0% liked)

Ukraine

8301 readers
470 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Damn. They could be hitting the Kremlin?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not a military target, and definitely not an intelligence target.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

No, I know. I just know that Russia doesn't respect rules of engagement, so the thought has probably occurred to some of them.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It isn't? AFAIK the whole decision making apparatus of the military and intelligence services are all there, neatly tucked between civilian stuff like museum etc..

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The net effect of a strike like that would not destroy Russian intelligence, only increase it.

[–] potentiallynotfelix 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd guess the Kremlin has an air defense system and either the drone or the projectile would be shot down before it could do damage

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And even if not, that seems just inflammatory and way more easily harnessed for huge propaganda wins for Putin & co, as opposed to suffocating like hitting refineries, airfields or other similarly painful and impactful but also further-from-the-everyday-people’s-minds-and-eyes targets.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

if putin would be in the kremlin during the attack, he wouldn't be able to use it for propaganda ☠ but I doubt he's in there often. probably hiding most of the time, then do a few surprise appearances so he can't get ambushed.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t they hit a window in some FSB/war ministry building in Moscow a year or so ago?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I seem to recall that attack was not claimed by Ukraine.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That AA artillery was really a show! ruzzkis know how to competently protect their assets.

😂

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately for the residents of Moscow, all Russian AA weapons are currently in Ukraine.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

are being currently destroyed in Ukraine.

😉

[–] Emmie@lemmings.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No fire :/ ah no wait there is a little merry fire

[–] ArachnidMania@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In this case, even without fire it would still be good. You’d want to hit the productive parts which would be hard to replace, and not necessarily the easily replaceable fuel tanks. The amount of fuel lost is one hit, while pretty can be replaceable, but if you make that surviving batch of fuel the last batch…

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

We want the productive part to make big boom :(

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago