251
So he's saying that people who get hit by bullets are losers? Noted.
Don't make the mistake of applying logic where there is none.
To conservatism, logic might as well be a quantum superposition based entirely upon the contents on your feefees, at any given planck time.
Content of my covfefes, surely? 😄
I mean technically speaking
It absolutely amazes me that people give him a free pass for this shit. Same with his remarks at Belleau Wood.
“Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump referred to the more than 1,800 marines who lost their lives at Belleau Wood as “suckers” for getting killed.
felon weirdo grifter trump only wants to “give out medals” as a form of quid pro quo.
Cant grift off the dead
If it staves off any Horst Wessel-izations, I'm not gonna complain about that mindset.
For the life of me I will never understand how he continues to shit all over veterans and so many of them continue to be the orange man’s cuck.
He could say, on fox "news" and outright say he'll eliminate the VA and all veteran benefits entirely because "if you get injured it's your own damn fault for being a terrible soldier"...and they'd still simp for their orange turd
The fact that so many veterans will still vote for that orange sack of shit, thinking that he supports them, is astounding. Trump has made it clear multiple times that he loathes veterans. Not even just a lack of support or empty gestures, he actually hates them, he actually thinks veterans are morons, losers, and suckers.
And for those who vote for him, I leave any inferences up to the reader.
I saw a Veteran with a Trump sticker on his Truck so I called him a Loser and Sucker and he Kissed my Feet!
You should have that printed on a tshirt in as many irritating typefaces as possible.
seems like hatred of gays/women/mexicans/etc. will make people vote for someone who actively shits on them and the institution they died for at every opportunity
the institution they died for
Hmm, usually dead people don’t vote.
yep. and when dead people vote, it's a pretty safe bet it was a R vote
“That’s so not weird thing to say” - MAGAPublicans
Being Donald Trump is so awesome, though. If you say something bone-headed like this, no matter how it it is recorded, all you have to do is say "I never said that!" and poof .... it never happened! Cool, huh?
Way to alienate your target audience, Donnie.
That's the most amazing thing.
After the 2016 election there was a panel discussion; all the creators of the top political TV shows were invited. West Wing, House of Cards, Veep, Scandal, and others. Every creator said the same thing. If they'd had a character say that they "liked soldiers who didn't get captured" the netowrks and advertisers would have demanded that character be despised by all Americans.
I've seen houses with the black POW/MIA flag and a Trump poster, because they can live in two realities at once.
There's a house in my neighborhood flying both of those flags and the Confederate flag. It's mind boggling.
Ask them. Which of the two/three flags do they actually support? Because the guy behind that flag says the other flag is for "losers and suckers".
Do you think if he got elected, due to being shot, he would give himself a Purple Heart? Or maybe a Medal of Honor?
I have no doubt he could with a straight face argue that running for Commander in Chief is essentially being in the military.
Actually he already has a purple heart…
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-purple-heart-226565
Firstly, lol. Of course to everything in that article. Can't believe I didn't already just assume that was true.
Second, I meant awarded one. That reads like the guy just symbolically gave the medal to Trump, but Trump isn't entitled to wear it. Anyone could have a replica Purple Heart, but without the citation it's just a gauche keepsake. It would be illegal for him to wear it—not that that would stop him or result in anyone telling him not to.
But it doesn't matter. Just idle speculation about exactly how big an asshole he is. Always shockingly so, but just not always in the ways I might predict.
Trump and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, have criticized the Democratic vice presidential nominee, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for his military record and have sought to make reverence for military service an issue in the election. Vance, who is also a veteran, has criticized Walz for opting to retire after more than 20 years in the National Guard but before his unit was set to be deployed to Iraq. Walz has defended his military service.
Well they pooched it up at the end there, but it's interesting that NBC even attempted to contextualize it in the larger sense of their attacks on Walz. That's unusually bold of them, I began to wonder if they thought theywere smelling blood. Until they tried neutering/both-sidesing it with "Walz has defended his military service[, though]".
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
251 points (98.1% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2029 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS