342

Disney has asked a Florida court to dismiss a wrongful death lawsuit filed earlier this year regarding a woman who passed away due to anaphylaxis after a meal at Disney Springs, citing an arbitration waiver in the terms and conditions for Disney+.

...

In the latest update for the Disney Springs wrongful death lawsuit, Disney cited legal language within the terms and conditions for Disney+, which “requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company.” Disney claims Piccolo reportedly agreed to this in 2019 when signing up for a one-month free trial of the streaming service on his PlayStation console.

In the May 31 motion filed to move the wrongful death lawsuit to arbitration, Disney attorneys said that the Disney+ subscriber agreement states that any dispute, except for small claims, “must be resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

...

Attorneys for Piccolo called Disney’s latest motion “preposterous,” and that it’s “‘absurd’ to believe that the 153 million subscribers to the popular streaming service have waived all claims against the company and its affiliates because of language ‘buried’ within the terms and conditions,” according to Newsday.

The notion that terns agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement.

Brian Denny, Piccolo’s West Palm Beach attorney in a filing on August 2, 2024

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 139 points 2 months ago

Disney claims Piccolo reportedly agreed to this in 2019 when signing up for a one-month free trial of the streaming service on his PlayStation console.

holy fucking shit. she 'signed up' for a one-month free trial 5 years ago and now youre forever held to some arbitration?! are you fucking kidding me?!?!

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 129 points 2 months ago

If the courts let Disney get away with this, it will slightly erode my faith in non-guillotine resolutions to the current phase of bullshit like this.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

When I read that my first thought was "this is why terrorism exists"

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago

I don't think our politicians get that our legal system and media outlets have created the perfect confluence of bullshit to where a vast swath of people feel the only way to make change is via violence. I fully anticipate a "both sides are equally at fault" within the next 12 months when some state crazy enough to do it sucedes from the union. "Aren't the leftists standing up to the far right militias equally at fault" they'll say

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don’t think our politicians get that our legal system and media outlets have created the perfect confluence of bullshit to where a vast swath of people feel the only way to make change is via violence.

This has been the situation in the US for minorities when interacting with the police and courts since the nation was founded. All protests for equal rights that turned into riots (because police escalated the situation) were the result of frustration with this kind of bullshit.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago

100%. Any time I hear people talking about "why are you destroying your own city" all I can think is... Why doesn't the city work for the people? What systemic issue is being ignored that the only solution left is a brick through a window? Why are the working class punishing the property holders?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Any time I hear people talking about “why are you destroying your own city” all I can think is…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31juZPqJaDQ

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Someone involved in this HAD to know how bad it would look. Even if not 100% accurate, the meme is going to be:

Don't subscribe to Disney+ or else Disney can kill you and get away with it

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 79 points 2 months ago

Whoa wtf, the lawyer who suggested that needs to be brought up before the bar immediately

[-] weariedfae@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago

Jesus fuck this is bleak dystopia stuff.

[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago

Forced arbitration should be outlawed in all forms. If it was possible to amend the bill of rights (given our current political bullshit) we should the have the right to a fair trail for all matters.

This is ridiculous.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The linked article sucks compared to the BBC article.

Importantly, and not that I agree with it, but they also accepted the arbitration clause for the account used to buy a ticket to the park in 2023. It’s not just the subscription arbitration clause that’s involved. This will likely complicate things.

Disney adds that Mr Piccolo accepted these terms again when using his Disney account to buy tickets for the theme park in 2023.

[-] solarvector@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago

I doubt they re-accepted it when they used their Disney account in any way a normal person would consider acceptance. That's why the corporation includes clauses like "by continued use of our service you agree to any further errosion of human rights we feel infringes upon our current growth or profit model".

Buying tickets was the most recent use of service.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Getting warmer with that one, but Disney Springs is not a ticketed theme park. It's a shopping and restaurant thing, basically an outdoor Disney-themed mall.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

Mr Piccolo alleges that the restaurant at Disney World - in Orlando, Florida

Seems both he and Disney say it’s at the park, idk. It’s bullshit either way, I hope he’s able to get some justice.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

In unrelated news, Boeing has revealed they will be entering the video streaming industry

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

So if this happens then every company in the US will begin hiding it in everything. It'll be in small writing on the packages "if you buy this item you can never sue us!"

[-] blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Just think, if the company arbitrates, the family might get a free parking voucher to a Disney land they live nowhere near!

Holy fuck I hope this suggestion gets laughed at by the judge, and promptly tossed.

Disney, an employee made a mistake, your employee, fucking own it.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 5 points 2 months ago

The perils of being a Disney adult.

[-] Manzas 4 points 2 months ago

I am gonna be downvoted for this but what happened here?1000007938

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's strange. Don't see it in my instance here.

[-] Manzas 1 points 2 months ago

I am on lemdro.id and eternity client it is fixed now but really strange I think I have experienced a similar issue like half a year ago ,but could be misremembering something.

[-] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

thought at first it was like: "the alleged murderer subscribed to disney plus, so we will defend them!"

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
342 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck Subscriptions

3650 readers
1 users here now

Naming and shaming all "recurring spending models" where a one-time fee (or none at all) would be appropriate and logical.

Expect use of strong language.

Follow the basic rules of lemmy.world and common sense, and try to have fun if possible.

No flamewars or attacking other users, unless they're spineless corporate shills.

Note that not all subscriptions are awful. Supporting your favorite ~~camgirl~~ creator or Lemmy server on Patreon is fine. An airbag with subscription is irl Idiocracy-level dystopian bullshit.

New community rule: Shilling for cunty corporations, their subscriptions and other anti-customer practices may result in a 1-day ban. It's so you can think about what it's like when someone can randomly decide what you can and can't use, based on some arbitrary rules. Oh what, you didn't read this fine print? You should read what you're agreeing to.

==========

Some other groovy communities for those who wish to own their products, their data and their life:

Right to Repair/Ownership

Hedges Development

Privacy

Privacy Guides

DeGoogle Yourself

F-Droid

Stallman Was Right

Some other useful links:

FreeMediaHeckYeah

Louis Rossman's YouTube channel

Look at content hosted at Big Tech without most of the nonsense:

Piped

Invidious

Nitter

Teddit

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS