108
submitted 3 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

After everyone seeing that speech he just gave it's no longer just pundits

[-] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 months ago

"Biden's debate was due to a cold."

"Okay he needs more sleep, it was jet lag. It'll go away in a few days."

"So several democratic members of congress, nationwide democrats, and public agreement say Biden is unfit, but just wait until the news conference, they'll see. Biden himself wants to stay in, so we should believe him."

President Putin and Vice President Trump.

"...So all the media is bought out and on the side of Trump, don't believe anything you see by credited publications. It's fake news, boycott them. Boycott anyone who disagrees with us."

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

It never was, that was always a lie. My mom's normie friends thought he should step down right from the debate. Polls have 40-60% of Democrats saying he should step down. We all saw it.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Imagine thinking that giving a bad speech is somehow comparable to being a rapist/felon that has promise to help Israel finish the job- even while you yell at everyone about how Biden is committing “a genocide.”

This is what propaganda looks like folks. It’s not stupid cartoonish posters. It’s not tinny radio ads urging you to join someone’s army-

It’s people like this…

People that want you to believe that a bad speech performed by someone that has a history of being bad at speeches- yet ran the country for four years with a lot of major changes for the better- is somehow worse than a rapist that tried to overthrow our capital because he lost. A rapist that is also a convicted felon- 34 times over.

THIS is propaganda by definition. It’s no myth. It’s no exaggeration. It’s this.

And it’s pathetic.

[-] upto60percentoff@kbin.run 18 points 3 months ago

I have to ask: are you just ignorant of the position of the anti -Biden crowd, or are you intentionally misconstruing it as them preferring Trump over Biden?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

First of all, Trump is a dick and may he rot in hell.

That out of the way, this is yet another article yelling at us to disbelieve our own eyes and not recognise an old man struggling. People who DON'T want Trump are watching the election toppling over the edge and are helpless to effect an outcome.

It's not about the pundits wanting Biden out, it's about the pundits demanding that everything is under control when it is obvious that it isn't.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 months ago

look at his past accomplishments not the possibility he'll be another Reagan or dianne feinstein before his term ends

it'll be a coup if people acknowledge he's not able to mentally hold office

Amazing how many worlds they use to say please don't see this as it's time to take your parents car keys or drivers license

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  • Because it sells/trends.

  • Because they're all glued to Twitter.

  • Because the Trump crowd is kinda right, they suffer from group think.

  • And because they're salty that the White House all but hoodwinked them, insisting that Biden was fine, which they clearly should have been more skeptical of.

I don't really buy the theories that the media conglomerate leadership is pushing for it. And I'm not calling them incompetent or anything, but clearly they weren't clear eyed with this issue when a large swathe of the public was.

And I'm not talking about Republicans. My mother would literally vote for a Hitler/Stalin ticket before Donald Trump, she despises him so much it's hilarious, but even she thought Biden was way too old to run. Even before the debate.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

That last bullet point is a big part of it. They got embarrassed on national TV, now they have to make up for being shills.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 16 points 3 months ago

Because pundits and even other Democrats don't care if Trump wins. They're rich and won't see hardship. But inflaming the public gets them in the spotlight and that's all they care about.

They are effectively Trump supporters.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They’re rich and won’t see hardship.

LOL, they need to study their history 'cause, with dictatorships, that's often true until it suddenly isn't. For example, remember that time when Mao sent all the "elites" to go work on the farms, or that other time when Pol Pot killed all the "intellectuals" (read: anybody who so much as wore glasses)? Hell, even if you're the dictator's ally you're not really safe. Plenty of Putin's buddies can testify to that -- oh wait, no they can't because their bodies are splattered on the ground after being defenestrated.

If there's any sliver of a silver lining to this catastrophic dystopian nightmare, it'll be seeing their stupid, smug faces go all surprised_pikachu.jpg just before the end.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

This comment is on point!

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

Because he is clearly fading and we don't know how bad it will get before November.

I mean, I'm locked in to vote D regardless, but I'm not super excited about Joe's prospects at the moment.

We saw with Feinstein, the Democrats are a gerontocracy that would make the CCP circa 1985 proud.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Because people click on those articles.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Saw this comment on Reddit:

Theres nothing new thats been going on in teh news lately, looking for something to grab views, and this is it. So this whole Biden dementia thing is going to get stretched out until the new flavor/news of the week comes out.

The media is upset that there's nothing unusual happening to report on. They need bad news because that grabs attention. Ukraine and Palestine are old news. If they could start a war for headlines, they would.

[-] itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The check engine light for American Democracy is blinking red. Smoke is pouring from the engine compartment, we have two flat tires and the driver is telling the scared children in the back seat "Don't worry, I don't need to pull over for anything, everything is fine up here, we can make another 3,000 miles easily"

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 15 points 3 months ago

Because... we have eyes? And have seen the polls? And know that this Biden can't win?

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, its only the pundits. Like Pelosi, Obama, and at least one prominent billionaire democrat donor. This premise is propaganda and intentionally ignorant of top leadership expressing the same concerns. Garbage.

[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Like, who do they think they can replace him with, huh? They got a dark horse waiting in the wings? Or are they cooking up the perfect President in a secret cloning lab somewhere?

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

They want him out because they're scared and know he will win in a landslide. Their only shot is to create confusion and make it sound like Biden is worse than the racist rapist with 34 felonies that wants to become dictator. VOTE. Volunteer to help give rides to people that need them to make it to vote.

[-] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Most pro union pro worker president we’ve had recently — that’s about it. He’s not Bernie but wealthy people really hate us poor working class folks.

[-] Kiernian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Because he's doing good things for the populace at large and pundits sound bytes are purchasable by those negatively impacted by those good things.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Being a pundit is a qualification, not a class. It means you have actual experience and training, not just another doomscroller with semi-informed, highly biased opinions like all of us.

Why is the "pundit class" so desperate to push carbon out of the atmosphere?

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

First time I heard someone claim that pundits have to have training

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Fucking finally someone had finally said it, and said it well

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
108 points (79.3% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS