343
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 107 points 4 months ago

No doubt he’ll be straight off to a private job somewhere, raking in millions, despite being less useful than a chocolate teapot. Despite what he says online.

[-] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Don't forget his 115 grand of the taxpayers money that he'll be getting every year for the rest of his life for "office costs and secretarial costs arising from his special position in public life” as well as severance and a special pension. Pocket change to him of course, but you know he's going to claim every single penny of it just for the joy of fucking over regular people, and then probably invest it in arms manufacturing or oil and coal companies or private prisons or something else evil like that, as a treat.

[-] nogooduser@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

I was going to say “up to” £115k but it looks like most of them claim as close to the maximum that they think that they can justify.

I’d have thought that the costs would go down year after year as the financial impact on their lives went down over time. Theresa May’s is going up for some reason and why the hell are Tony Blair, John Major and Gordon Brown still claiming the full amount!?

[-] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 months ago
[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago
[-] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?

Also happy cake day 🎉😊

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks!! And shit has it really been a year yet? My app still says 11 months but maybe a few hours are left

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago
[-] sunzu@kbin.run 9 points 4 months ago

He earned his stripes fucking the poors so now he will be rewarded by the big club for his services.

Job well done, sucks to suck peasants!

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sunak has a net worth over 800 million. I doubt many can afford him as a clock puncher.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago

His kind aren't known for saying "I have enough money"

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sure, but his main motivation isn't to fuck over the poors as a mercenary for some other asshole's wealth. It's to fuck over the poors for his own interest.

Dude already was a Goldman Sachs banker. There's not many depths he hasn't already plumbed.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Less usefull than a chocolate teapot.. nice.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 69 points 4 months ago

As an American who is absolutely horrified and embarrassed about our own political climate and voter behavior, it's very good to see a sane and dull transfer of power.

Sunak's speech after stepping down:

Whilst he has been my political opponent, Keir Starmer, will shortly become our prime minister. In this job, his successes will be all our successes, and I wish him and his family well. Whatever our disagreements in this campaign, He is a decent, public spirited man who I respect.

He and his family deserve the very best of our understanding as they make the huge transition to their new lives behind this door. And as he grapples with this most demanding of jobs in an increasingly unstable world.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

And, like with the US, you now have progressives inheriting a house that conserves shat in for over a decade. Austerity, Brexit, etc.

I’m curious to see how good Britain’s long term memory is. America forgets about the dangers of conservatism all too quickly.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

So does Britain. Something like 75 of the last 100 years have had Conservatives in power. Obviously, what that means has changed over time, but it's clear that every time Labour gets a shot at governing, Brits yell "Not good enough!" and put the Tories back in office.

[-] mdwhite999@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't really call the Labour party progressive

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He didn’t have to do this. It has nothing to do with the transfer of power. Just tradition to run away when you lose but you’re 100% allowed to stay party leader

[-] anlumo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Not in UK's Conservative Party. They don’t mess around, if the leader doesn’t deliver, they’re out, no questions asked.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Except it has nothing to do with vacating Downing St and the transition of power

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago

I mean, they literally already have a king.

[-] tlou3please@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yep our country is screwed in many ways but at least we haven't so far dabbled in that kind of madness. It is fundamentally a properly functioning democracy.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 49 points 4 months ago

I feel like the UK is lagging behind and we will see a rubber banding effect. After a decade of cons we will see a weak centrist labour party that will try to right the wrongs of the previous government while also taking all the blame for it. Then come next election cycle, because they were too pussyfoot to change FPTP, a stronger than ever right wing party will undo anything.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The FPTP system in the UK is what makes this incredibly likely. Yes labour won huge with their Tory lite platform, but turnout was shit and their huge majority win isn't even 35 percent of the people who even bothered voting. That's a very fragile landslide and it will turn around when these milquetoast liberals fail to change anything (because they don't want to change anything).

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately we won't get proper socialists after that, we'll get fascists.

[-] dignick@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Labour got less votes than 2019. What a landslide! I’m not sure their Tory lite platform did them any favours. They were just Not The Tories and reform split the Tory vote because they were also Not The Tories and promised that everything would be perfect if we just hate immigrants a bit more

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, FPTP is a shitty system and needs to be changed. But it's disconcerting to consider how many hard right Reform MPs we'd have now if we had proportional representation.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To be sure, but with actual labour supporters looking at that and thinking "it's because Tories didn't actually keep their promises to stop immigration" and "let's opress trans people too" I honestly don't think the resulting government with a few more in opposition would've been worse than something where an actual left party might've succeeded. You know, one that provides a revolutionary vision of hope.

“I do think people need hope, but it needs to be what I call ordinary hope, realistic hope,” Starmer said.

https://inthesetimes.com/article/britain-keir-starmer-corbyn-election-serious

This government is doomed.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah that sounds about right.

[-] li10@feddit.uk 41 points 4 months ago

Obviously not feeling remotely sorry for him, but it makes me laugh when other MPs pile on the prime minister for their losses.

Like… it’s all of you fuckers that have done this over the past 14 years. Rishi was part of that as well, but Conservatives had already lost by the time he became PM.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Yeah don’t get me wrong Rishi was absolute shit, but the man was an upgrade compared to Truss and BoJo

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Very true. Just not to the ultra nationalists and racists that ran to reform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago

Why does Rishi always look like his mum knitted him?

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 26 points 4 months ago

He's got a 7 million dollar home in California that he's gonna hide in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 months ago

Pretty standard move in Parliamentary Politics.

I bet Truss, Sunak and their ilk with find lots of work as talking heads on American and British conservative shows.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 points 4 months ago

Truss as a telly commentator would be brilliant considering she can barely deliver a normal sentence!

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

That outfit looks like it was purchased by a stylist and the tags were removed just before taking this picture. “Make sure you pull up the sleeves so it looks like you’re hard working!”

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

....easier to eat his manwich sandwiches...

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

Don't you think he looks tired?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I haven't seen an Englishman take that harsh a blow since Hugh Grant!

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Depressing that the UK clearly still wants a conservative government, they've just, after 14 years, finally realized the Tories are incompetent perverts.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
343 points (99.4% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2719 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS