205

Deutsche Bank Article Among Trump's Classified Documents Raises Eyebrows (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Theprogressivist@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump appeared to keep an article about a dead Deutsche Bank whistleblower among his classified documents, according to newly released FBI photos.

The article was a feature about Val Broeksmit, a rock musician, who leaked details of Deutsche Bank's files to media and FBI agents investigating the bank's alleged links to money laundering, the Trump Organization and Russia.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 67 points 4 months ago

Hey is that where Justice Kennedy’s son worked who gave trump that sweetheart loan when no one else would?

It is? Wow and you say there’s evidence of ties to russian oligarchs eh? Boy howdy ain’t that a ding-dang ol thang there. Oh well. It’s just a complicated mystery no one will figure out i guess.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

Early in her career, a friend worked for a white shoe law firm in NYC and she used to use Deutsche Bank as her reference point for corruption. Like, I’d go on my lil’ leftist rants about the 2008 financial crisis and she’d say, “Oh come on. They aren’t anywhere close to as bad as Deutsche Bank.”

I always wondered what fucked up things they had to be doing that they were officially The Worst Bank to corporate lawyers. And beyond that, the main part of a corporate lawyer’s job is litigation prevention and saying “No.” to the worst ideas. So, what did they want to do but get told it was so illegal, not even a giant international bank with teams of lawyers could get away with it.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

Hey, I learned something new today, thanks!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-shoe_firm

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Violating sanctions

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 12 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Donald Trump appeared to keep an article about a dead Deutsche Bank whistleblower among his classified documents, according to newly released FBI photos.

The photo was included in special counsel Jack Smith's rebuttal of Trump's claim that the FBI mishandled boxes of documents found at his Florida home.

Trump is facing 40 federal charges in Cannon's court over his alleged handling of sensitive materials seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, after leaving the White House in January 2021.

In February Judge Engoron, who sits on the New York State Supreme Court, imposed a fine of $454 million, including interest, on Trump after concluding he engaged in civil fraud by falsely inflating the value of his assets when securing bank loans.

Smith's explanation in court documents of the randomness of Trump's boxes of personal possessions didn't stop the speculation on Tuesday and Wednesday.

On Tuesday, journalist Sandi Bachom wrote on X: "WHY would Trump have an article about Val Broeksmit in his secret file folders and why would Jack Smith release it last night?"

The original article contains 734 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024

205 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19159 readers

4460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News