23
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/insanepeoplefacebook@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago

I need this mysterious "rock expanding" technology.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

It is amazing to me how these people call the ancient Egyptians primitive.

Although they may be considered primitive by today's technological standards, they were very, very smart and accomplished tremendous things with very little resource.

They were not primitive intellectually. They were smart, capable and intelligent people.

Two more points I'd like to address about the cutting of these rocks number one archaeologists replicated the way these rocks would be cut with technology they would have during the time that these rocks were cut. Number two. They would drag the rocks. They dragged the rocks.

Oh, and constructions like the Great pyramids would often take generations to complete and these weren't done in a couple of years these things took decades if not more.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

They had the exact same brains we do. Something people like this seem to not understand.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

TBF, the ancient Egyptians would probably also not understand that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well yeah, those guys thought our hearts were our brains, but they weren't claiming it was beyond their abilities to build a pyramid.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Although they may be considered primitive by today's technological standards, they were very, very smart and accomplished tremendous things with very little resource.

They were not primitive intellectually. They were smart, capable and intelligent people.

This is exactly the point many people don't understand: People in the past were not less intelligent than today's people.

We developed more ways to discover stuff and more precise tools to measure and detect things and of course with computers we got the ability to handle extremely complex data. All of this gives us an edge over past people science wise but we had very capable thinkers 200, 600 and 4000 years ago. All basic principles of mathematics have been developed a long time ago.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They also see something like an expertly-knapped flint hand axe and think "I could do that in my back yard in five minutes" because they don't understand that something that looks primitive might actually be a really useful tool and actually not easy to make.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The pithy version of that is that we know more things than our ancestors, but we're not smarter than them.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is why I have a hard time taking anyone seriously who calls any human society, past or present, "primitive."

[-] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Also the current theory is, get ready for it...they used boats. They flooded the area the Pyramids were being built and just floated them in on barges. With water.

'Beyond human thinking' my ass.

They flooded the area the Pyramids were being built

I don't think that's "the current theory".

I think you might be talking about digging canals. It's conceivable that a canal would be built to take the rocks to the construction site. Just recently however we've found evidence of a tributary of the nile that flowed past the sites of a number of pyramids.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I've read tributary as trebuchet first and was equally impressed and confused for a moment.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Just launching them to the top with extreme precision so they land right into their spot.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago
[-] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

People have said the same things about stonehenge

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

exception. there's a huge trend toward alien theories about human achievement based on geography. you can bet your ass even if something like the colosseum was in central africa people would be saying it's alien tech.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

And virtually no other European ancient site. Stonehenge is usually the lone exception.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] anonymous111@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Funilly enough:

Cheddar Man: DNA shows early Briton had dark skin

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42939192

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Aliens just didn't like white people.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

yeah, because the only way that brown people could have built anything impressive is if gods/aliens helped them.

Notice how these people never call into question the coliseum or the parthenon? It's just thinly veiled racism.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I think many of the people who push this aren't overtly racist, but there is no question that the source of all of this, Madame Blavatsky, was just a racist.

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=61440

[-] banana_lama@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I like to remind people that the heaviest stones for the pyramids were about 400 tons while a few thousand years later in Lebanon the largest stones for the temple complex in Baalbek are about 1250 tons.

But no one questions that the construction there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Ok, I'll go first... Who the fuck says 2 million and 300 thousand? Either say 2.3 million, or 2 300 000 or even two million and three hundred thousand. Fuck it, even two point three million would work. But 2 million and 300 thousand? You're the fucking alien dammit!

[-] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

2 million as well as 300 thousand

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Not only were humans not able to stack rocks, they didn't stack rocks in every continent that still stand to this day

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

where's the guy with the crazy hair

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 4 months ago

He couldn't make it as he had a prior reservation for an anal probing session

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How did the aliens manage to make that when they could have spent all their time on the internet, or watching movies, playing video games, porn, going to concerts, driving cars, taking flights on airplanes, etc whatever.

It's obvious humans could never make something as advanced as a giant ...rock.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Imagine how much more video games and porn you could consume if you just had two more arms and hands?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not so sure we have the brain capacity for putting one thing on top of another thing.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't believe that for one second.

But I'll be honest, I was thinking about cookies when I saw your reply.
What's going on?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I'm glad the size of bricks has been reduced. A wheelbarrow is useless here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2599 readers
131 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS