this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1018 points (100.0% liked)

196

18073 readers
852 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Certain crops can benefit think from some shade throughout the day:

The study aggregates the effect of agrivoltaics on crop yields at different sites. Tomatoes saw up to double yield with agrivoltaics, while wheat, cucumbers, potatoes and lettuce showed significant negative impacts and corn and grapes showed minimal impact.

I assume that maximal crop output would happen if you just grow things in their optimal climate, but then you rely more heavily on transportation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Agrivoltaics are so cool!

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you put solar panels above your crops, that makes them significantly harder to harvest

Depends on the crop lots of crops are still harvested by hand. Also lots of crops are destroyed by hail, heavy rains or high winds all of which are somewhat protected by solar panels above.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indoor farming is on the rise, as you can have the optimal climate anywhere. It's more spatially efficient with vertical planting, but it has a far higher energy cost for air conditioning and potentially lighting. At least the farm workers are cooler too 🤷‍♀️

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK lighting is the biggest energy eater for indoor farming.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends. Natural lighting makes more sense closer to the equator, while ac costs are probably higher than farther north. Regardless of what the energy is spent on, it has a huge footprint.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Artificial lighting is not optional, otherwise it's not indoor farming, just fancy greenhouses.