view the rest of the comments
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
Despite decrying liberal democratic elections and their meaninglessness, the fr*nch and ukian elections put me back on the election "analysis" mindset. I feel compelled to respond to the OP from reddit.world. Is it true that higher turnout simply means democrats win?
2012: 58.6% turnout, Obama wins
2016: 60.1% turnout, Trump wins
2020: 66.6% turnout, Biden wins
The issue with truisms is that they usually aren't true. When someone says "the average age of fox news viewers is 67" they imply these people will basically die by the next decade, but leave it the fact that this average isn't going up by 4 every election cycle.
Also it's a unique fun to see lemmitors fight by calling each other out on how much of a redditor each other are.
Also trying to make definitive statements about sonethhing that happens once every 4 years is meaningless.
There are a huge list of factors around every election, this one happens to have the quirk of both options being widely detested.