290
submitted 1 week ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Fewer than three weeks before actor Alec Baldwin is due to go on trial in Santa Fe, New Mexico, prosecutors have said that he “engaged in horseplay with the revolver”, including firing a blank round at a crew member on the set of Rust before the tragic accident occurred.

Baldwin is facing involuntary manslaughter charges in the 2021 shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

In new court documents, prosecutors said they plan to bring new evidence to support their case that the 66-year-old actor and producer was reckless with firearms while filming on the set and displayed “erratic and aggressive behavior during the filming” that created potential safety concerns.

Prosecutors in the case, which is due to go to trial on 10 July, have previously alleged that to watch Baldwin’s conduct on the set of Rust “is to witness a man who has absolutely no control of his own emotions and absolutely no concern for how his conduct affects those around him”.

In the latest filing, special prosecutors Kari Morrissey and Erlinda Johnson allege that Baldwin pointed his gun and fired “a blank round at a crew member while using that crew member as a line of site as his perceived target”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 162 points 1 week ago

There's no good reason to use a functional gun in film and theater, change my mind.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

The only reason to do it is verisimilitude, and that's not compelling because a fake is easy enough to acquire/create.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 week ago

In 2024 having a real firearm on set is unconscionable. Especially without a proper armorist. This was not only avoidable, but the situation shouldn’t have even presented itself.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

It also only matters at all because of people banging on about "this movie was set in 1935, but the down-bent charging handle on gun X wasn't introduced until 1941". Which will still happen, anyway, and it's not a good enough reason to have real firearms on set.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

Isn't literally everything in film and TV intended to look real, or at least look like it exists in that universe?

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Sure, but the difference between a real gun and a fake gun is not that great.

Also, they often shoot 30 times without reloading from guns with a much lesser capacity. Their interest in realism is often so-so.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

Wasn't your original point that they use real guns so the guns... look real?

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

My original point was that the difference in how real it looks is not so great that it is outweighed by dangers of having a functional gun.

My later point was that they can't be all that concerned with being realistic if they are shooting 30 times from a gun with a 10 round magazine without reloading.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

Ironically, I think there is a link there. I am more likely to relax my disbelief if things look real. Once I have immersed myself into a situation I believe ( because it seems real ), I am less likely to pay attention to things like shot count.

It is the same as having heros that struggle with situations early on and then later are effortlessly capable of so much more. I already believed them so now they can take advantage of that.

load more comments (110 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
290 points (92.9% liked)

News

21656 readers
4709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS