592
submitted 5 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

California city has agreed to pay $900,000 to a man who was subjected to a 17-hour police interrogation in which officers pressured him to falsely confess to murdering his father, who was alive.

During the 2018 interrogation of Thomas Perez Jr by police in Fontana, a city east of Los Angeles, officers suggested they would have Perez’s dog euthanized as a result of his actions, according to a complaint and footage of the encounter. A judge said the questioning appeared to be “unconstitutional psychological torture”, and the city agreed to settle Perez’s lawsuit for $898,000, his lawyer announced this week.

The extraordinary case of a coerced false confession has sparked widespread outrage, with footage showing Perez in extreme emotional and physical distress, including as officers brought his dog in and said the animal would need to be put down due to “depression” from witnessing a murder that had not actually occurred.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 91 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I like how each subsequent time the dollar amount is mentioned, you learn that the previous number had been rounded up.

Man awarded $1m is glad to receive $900,000. That $898,000 will make him feel better but is $897,600 really adequate compensation? However, it's kind of unfair that the tax payers end up footing this $897,550 bill.

It fits right in with this bad cop story.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Not to mention the taxes hell pay on the award, right back to the govt that detailed him. That'd burn my britches

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 months ago

Wait, that doesn’t count as income and get taxed does it? I always assumed a court order payment wouldn’t be taxed because it’s only being awarded to make you “whole”. You don’t pay taxes on the money you get from your insurance when your car gets totaled, why would court ordered restitution be any different?

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I always assumed a court order payment wouldn’t be taxed

Unfortunately that is not true. The only tax-free court imposed restitution is that of physical pain and suffering not mental anguish. There may be other small caveats like hospitalization for mental but yeah, if you get a settlement expect the govt to come looking for its cut after the lawyer takes theirs.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago

God we suck as a nation.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago

I didn’t have to pay tax on the small claims court case I won. Other cities/states might be different.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

I agree it shouldn't. At the end of the day that money has already been taxed once. It should go to the person as if it was already theirs, because it's making up for something that should have been theirs.

[-] von@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Is the man named GOB? in his 897 thousand, five hundred forty five dollar [law]suit! Come on!

I liked the reference

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

they don't allow you to bring bees in here

this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
592 points (99.3% liked)

News

23267 readers
1453 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS