this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14163 readers
762 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lerios@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

why? genuinely who does this help and how does it make google money? it seems like they're paying for the energy for ai content in exchange for absolutely nothing

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The people internally at Google are techbro true believers. If it's new technology it is inherently good and an improvement.

[–] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The theory is that people don't want to click through blue links trying to find a source (or sources) they can trust, they rather want an instant summarised answer to any question. Google already does instant summarised answers for things like "when is the next public holiday" - generative AI content would expand these instant answers to any question, at the cost of accuracy. Google thinks ChatGPT is taking their market share (which it kinda is, and kinda was a year ago when they started developing this). The big idea of this new feature from Google is to retain market share, which is a prerequisite to making money.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

I thought Google was already incorporating some machine learning stuff into the core search algorithm anyways, which would be a much better use than directly making up sentences.