this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1346 points (97.9% liked)

News

36000 readers
2345 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They know Donald will destabilize the country and accelerate a collapse. They think that will make room for China to expand.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If their goal is to destroy the US then helping Trump makes sense, at least.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The hypocrisy comes when millions of vulnerable people they pretend to care about actually suffer as a direct result of their nihilism. Acceptable costs, right?

It really is shocking that more people on the "Lemmy left" don't see this. The US is one of the most tolerant places in the world for a bunch of otherwise marginalized groups. Pretending that it is irredeemable and must be destroyed because of your cold war grudge is destroying one of their biggest safe spaces and condemning them to suffer.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hypothetically if you had to chose between supporting Israel or Biden winning in 2024 which would you choose?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do you think my comment has anything to do with Israel?

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You didn't answer my question so I dunno why you think I would answer yours.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just hypothetically would you rather have a duck sized horse or a horse sized duck?

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By not answering you have chosen to support Israel and Joe Biden loses the election in this completely hypothetical scenario.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Buddy I can't help you with these delusions. I'm not that kind of doctor.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now I'm going to repeat: I'll be voting 3rd party in the upcoming election.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm going to give you a serious answer even though it's obvious you know nothing about us and don't care to learn.

Accellerationism is stupid and reactionary, and from my perspective Biden seems to be doing a fine job of doing that as it is. Trump is a symptom produced from the policies Biden has spent his entire career enacting. There will be plenty more candidates like Trump, because the material conditions that produced him still exist, and Biden is perpetuating and worsening those conditions.

The US is in decline and that's not going to change regardless of who wins this election. What I'd most prefer is to refocus our efforts domestically in order to address some of the many different crises that the country is experiencing. If we did this, it's likely that China would eventually eclipse the US due to it's manufacturing capacity, but the lives of everyday people would be improved and the country would become more stable and healthy. Whether the decline could be reversed, I don't know, but it would at least be a gradual, peaceful decline.

But that's never going to happen, even a little bit. Instead, our leaders are intent on getting involved in conflicts all over the world while ignoring all the problems at home and allowing things to get worse and worse. The geopolitical interests of the US government are completely disconnected from the interests of the American people.

The US doesn't need to collapse for China to grow. China's strategy for many years has been a policy of peaceful coexistence with capitalist states while it focuses on economic development. And that strategy is proving successful. The only concern is what the US is going to do once it becomes eclipsed as global hegemon, and the concerning thing is that while China manufactures more than the next 10 countries combined, the US spends more on the military than the next 10 countries combined. The possibility that the US could start WWIII in an attempt to maintain hegemony by pressing the area where it has an advantage is deeply concerning.

Even if you believe, as you probably do, that Xi Jinping is paying me to run around some niche corner of the internet pretending to be Phoenix Wright - why would China actually want to destabilize the US? They're already winning the peace.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hm, read a dissertation from a Uighur genocide fan who communicates in childish video game cartoons, or focus on people who aren't delusional? Tough choice for me but I'll have to go with the latter.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, no one can say I didn't try. If that's the kind of engagement you want,

ahem

objection

phoenix-objection-1phoenix-objection-2 In a court of law, evidence is the only thing that matters! Your baseless accusations are... completely meaningless!

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What a goofy little clown. You have no substantial thoughts and have to do this instead.

Thanks for the laughs and nostalgia. Loved that game.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have no substantial thoughts

objection

There is a contradiction in this testimony! You literally just called my previous comment a "dissertation" and refused to read it! So it's impossible for you to know if my thoughts are substantive or not!

The defense would like to submit a piece of evidence: this tweet!

This doesn't actually prove anything, I just think it's funny!

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago