221
One Login: Towards a Single Fediverse Identity on ActivityPub (thenewstack.io)
submitted 6 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In response to Bray’s toot, Evan Prodromou — one of the creators of ActivityPub, who is currently writing an O’Reilly book about the protocol — noted that this “is also the argument for using the ActivityPub API.” He described the API as “an open, extensible API that can handle any kind of activity type — not just short text.”

This gets to the nub of the issue. The fact that I can’t use my Mastodon identity to, for example, sign up to Pixelfed is not actually an ActivityPub issue — it’s because the two applications, Mastodon and Pixelfed, each require you to create an account on their respective products. What Prodromou is suggesting is that, technically, you can use the ActivityPub API for account access.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pieresqi@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Wow, can't wait to get banned in 1 instance and that ban cascading to federated fediverses(?) (through fediverse ??) and getting banned everywhere.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 47 points 6 months ago

I think power users might reject it just as we shy away from “login with Google.”

Love it for normies though. Reducing barriers here is huge.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

How about?:

Fediverse > Fedigalaxy > Fediplanet > Fedicountry

ActivityPub > Platform > Instance > Community

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I prefer:

Fediverse > Fedichorus > Fedibridge > Fedichorus

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 6 months ago

If any federated banning networks do pop up, I'd expect them to form groups, with different groups having different standards. And the idea being that if someone's banned from one place with similar standards, the rest of the group probably wouldn't welcome the content.

It'll come down to places and groups being reasonable, and not banning for stupid reasons (at least by that group's standards). And if they are unreasonable, it'll reflect on the group, as nobody would bother posting to those instances any more.

And in a way, the ultimate "ban" will be with the host instance, similarly to email.
An admin at lemmy.world might get a report that an account is spreading csam links everywhere, and to consider banning them, for example.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
221 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

28240 readers
216 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world