27
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15896 readers
286 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Sure but this isn’t that.
Most of what I’m seeing is “don’t use AI!”
If I were a film maker I would lean into it’s weaknesses and make some uncanny valley stuff.
AI generators are built entirely on stolen art, without credit given, and used strictly to eliminate jobs and accumulate more capital. Its bad.
If that’s how you feel then nothing I say is gonna shift your opinion. Good day!
Those are facts though.
Why not just hire the artists that the AI is pulling from to do the work then?
Or ... does the film credit the sources that the AI art was pulled from? Do the people that did the work get any credit for... you know... the stuff they did that somebody else is profiting from?