this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
813 points (98.5% liked)

News

35692 readers
2790 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Over 100 children at the school are susceptible to virus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, but it's a hundred kids suffering, not the idiot parents.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And with some small but non-zero chance dying several years later from SSPE.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It has been estimated that about 2 in 10,000 people who get measles will eventually develop SSPE

Depending in your view, thats not a really low chance. Since we're talking of a chance to die - I'd say it's high.

However, a 2016 study estimated that the rate for unvaccinated infants under 15 months was as high as 1 in 609.

Oops - kids at school are older, but these numbers are way higher... Let's just run both and see what happens. I don't have enough data, to do some "real math" but someone mentioned about 100 students being at risk of getting infected as they're unvaccinated. Lets just assume all of them get infected.

First: 2 in 10000 will develop SSPE, that means 9998 in 10000 won't. For 100 students: (9998/10000)^100 = 0.98 so, a 98% chance, that no-one is affected and tha lt means a 2% chance, that at least one is affected by SSPE.

Second number: 1 in 609 means, that 608 in 609 won't. For 100 students: (608/609)^100 = 0.85 so that's an 85% chance that nothing happens and a whopping 15% chance that at least one student develops SSPE.

I know this math I likely not near reality, but damn.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At the very least when (if) those kids grow up they should realise what fucking morons their parents are for gambling with their lives and the anti Vax notions don't get passed down

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Nope, they will have survivor bias. "I didn't need the vaccine and I made it" type of argument.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe, though some of their friends might die, or they might remember the times they were really sick for no reason

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not to mention immunocompromised people who can't get vaccinated

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Or immigrants from parts of the world where vaccines aren't given out enough or just very unlucky people who were fully vaxxed but it didn't take.