394
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by JustZ@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Comment on Headline: I don't know if swarm is the right word, I think that implies they entered the home? I guess a group of insects is a swarm whether it's inside or out. They had their Nazi party in the street, and the governor's home is protected at all times by state police.

...................................

Dozens of Neo-Nazis demonstrated outside the home of Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey (D) on Saturday night, in an intimidating display of hate. Members of the group NSC-131 — which seeks to create a white-only ethnostate in New England — marched Saturday night through the Boston suburb of Arlington, uniformed in khakis, black jackets, face masks, and baseball caps.

The NSC-131 members moved under cover of darkness, co-opting the progressive activist chant, “Whose streets? Our streets!” The neo-Nazis then lined up on the sidewalk across the street from the Healey’s home, which was protected by state troopers. The group’s members lit red traffic flares, and held these aloft with stiff arm Hitler salutes. They unfurled a banner reading: “WE’RE NOT GOING ANYWHERE.”

The action by NSC-131 was an in-the-streets response to civil rights charges brought against the group by the state late last year. A 26-page complaint was lodged by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell (D) in December. Campbell denounced the group’s efforts to “target and terrorize people across Massachusetts and interfere with their rights,” and insisted the state of Massachusetts is dedicated to “holding this neo-Nazi group and its leaders accountable.”

That legal complaint hits NSC-131 for actions that “unlawfully target and disrupt LGBTQ+ events,” including drag queen story hours; “unlawfully target immigrants based on race and national origin,” including by trespassing at hotels where asylum seekers have been offered temporary housing; “unlawfully attack members of the public,” with frequent brawling at NSC-131 marches; and for numerous efforts to “disrupt public peace and safety.”

...............................

Maura Healy was an aggressive lawyer for a long time before she was governor. I'm sure the AG is no exception.

Interesting that they think they are the ones not going anywhere in the state where America drew its first breath of liberty. Fuck Nazis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

MA isn't really known for its strong recognition of the 2A, particularly as it pertains to "assault weapons" and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Maybe so, but I would be surprised if she didn't have armed security.

Then again, there was apparently none at Pelosi's home, so who knows?

[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, who knows? If only someone had transcribed the article into the lemmy post and mentioned armed security in the third sentence. But I guess since that didn't happen, we'll never know if the Governor's home is protected at all times by the Massachusetts State Police.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You know, sometimes people miss things when they read something. Maybe you should just point it out rather than be a dick about it.

[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

I'm sure she does have armed protection and it sounds like the staties were involved too so I'm sure they are armed as well. Unfortunately the rest of us aren't allowed to defend ourselves.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago
[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks! I'll add this to my collection!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately the rest of us aren’t allowed to defend ourselves.

I'm pretty sure guns are still legal in the U.S.

[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

MA has banned the AR-15 and similar firearms as well as magazines holding more than 10 rounds even though they are legal under federal law.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So you're saying that the only way you can possibly defend yourself is with an AR-15 and more than 10 rounds?

Because this is what you claimed:

Unfortunately the rest of us aren’t allowed to defend ourselves.

I mean I'm pretty sure I can defend myself legally with a handgun if I have one. Or even a baseball bat.

[-] FatCrab@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

You can get a permit and gun in MA. It isn't even that hard. The issue is that MA has exceptionally strong municipalities and the "queue" for permits go through the sheriff's office and each office is afforded quite a bit of latitude in how long they're allowed to let people wait.

[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

The last time I lived in MA it was considered a May Issue state meaning that the sheriff's office could deny your license for any reason. I just checked and it looks like that was changed in 2022. Thanks for prompting me to update my knowledge.

I still hate visiting MA because my out of state permits are not recognized. I have a resident permit for the state that I live in as well as a non resident permit from another state but MA only recognizes their own permit.

Also my firearm has an 11 round magazine which makes it illegal in MA.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
394 points (96.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
1661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS