383
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
383 points (88.5% liked)
Not The Onion
12193 readers
504 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I expected another story about a Tesla self-driving passengers to their doom. Instead, "the driver accidentally hit the gas pedal", so it being a Tesla is really an irrelevant detail. Would the headline have read "Hyundai plunges into Norway fjord..." if it were a different car.
I downvoted because of this. I don’t like Tesla. But I hate this click baiting and lying to tarnish a reputation. Let them do it themselves. They are doing a good enough job.
It's also the boy-who-cried-wolf syndrome. When you make shit up all the time, no one is going to care when it actually matters.
Self-driving (er, “”self””-driving) didn’t cross my mind actually. I read:
I take your point that the benefits of being able to make these assumptions may not outweigh the downside of potentially misleading people on the potential self-driving aspect.
Where's the lie
There is none. They just threw it in there to tarnish the sites reputation
Edit: People obviously don't get humor around here. Obviously the site threw Tesla in the title for rage/click baiting. The accident had nothing to do with the cars brand. Guess you're all too... Enraged? l However, I stand by my point: There is no lie.
If the car went in due to driver error, why mention the make of the car in the title?
NYPost is a shitty propaganda outlet by design. Not just because I'm to the left so I hate it. It's literally the purpose of the site.
So yes, this article ONLY exists to trigger the thought of "electric car bad" in their readers.
The sauna boat is the factor
Yeah, I'd definitely have posted it no matter the make of car.
Yeah but would the headline have mentioned the make in that case?
Probably not. A subeditor knows how to get extra clicks.
What a fascinating idea. The story should be entirely about the sauna boat
3 years ago, during peak Autopilot hype, the media absolutely would have plastered "AUTOPILOT FAIL?????" all over the headlines. With a quiet retraction the next day with the driver admitting to a manual mistake.
I remember there was one big story about a Tesla that wrapped itself around a tree, caught fire, and occupants died. Instant blame on "Autopilot kills" and "EVs dangerous!!!" even though everyone who actually looked at the facts knew that autopilot won't even activate on that street and it wouldn't automatically go that fast.
A few weeks later post-autopsy, turns out it was a drunk dude showing off his car to his drunk friend, treated a residential road as a drag strip, with predictable results.
Its an electric car thing, they have much higher acceleration than most people are used to so people crash them like this.