746
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 330 points 4 months ago

So, instead of getting the ability to search for videos properly, with negative search terms, user defined video length spans, exact dates, sort by reverse date order etc... we get ambient mode and color search? Can someone please, for the sake of humanity and my sanity, erase this company and its parent from the planet.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 171 points 4 months ago

Seriously, there was a time when Google was lauded for all kinds of awesome innovation, and joked about that you needed a PhD to even be a janitor there.

Look at them now. They can't even do basic search functionality anymore, and are so misguided that they put out color filters for video.

I 100% agree they need to just stop existing at this point.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 months ago

Arent there like Ralph from the Simpsons originating jokes about how like, this crayon tastes like yellow?

Congrats YouTube, thank you so much.

I can now enjoy green flavored content, fuck having a working suggestion algorithm that actually recommends interesting content, I guess I can use YouTube for what it seems to be intended for these days, as an ambient noise and color generator for my monitor and room while i actually do something else.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Ralph from the Simpsons is the best analogy for how I see Google now. Brilliant.

[-] flumph@programming.dev 68 points 4 months ago

The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

In YouTube Music, when you're building a tuner to create a station, you can't search at all. Instead, you get an endless scroll off bands and have to find the one you want that way. The order is random.

Like .. Pandora let you do the same thing with search back in the 00's

[-] grue@lemmy.world 59 points 4 months ago

The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

It's not boggling; it's very simple: they discovered that having shitty search apparently makes them more money than having good search.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 months ago

Bingo!

~~Don't~~ Be Evil.

It was obvious they would enshittify, they literally told us they would.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I feel like maybe the term "search" when applied to digital services should be regulated. What Google et al do isn't search, it's recommendations. Recommendations can be useful, but they sure as hell don't replace search. Someone call the EU.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

if they won't regulate what 'news' or 'organic' or 'private' means then good luck with 'search'. waiting for the government to get wise and save us, still?

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Which "the government"?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

“Organic” is absolutely a regulated term in the US, not sure about elsewhere. You might be thinking of “natural.”

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

Stop being so chartreuse! Would it kill you to be a little more periwinkle?

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

You made me search the internet to rid me of my confusion! I'm all vermilion now!

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 months ago

I absolutely hate the ambient mode. I mean, I get it, it's kind of my problem if I am trying to use ancient desktop, but it's also pretty unnecessary.

Trying to view YouTube videos on many school computers became a pain in the ass. Some are so laggy that I can't even get to disable the ambient mode without which it would still be somewhat usable. (But hey, piped.video works.)
Hell, even my HP 255 G7 (a fairly average office laptop with Ryzen 3 3200U) struggles with it. It gets laggy and turns into hairdryer.

Secondly, it's distracting.

[-] Justas@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

Yes it's super weird that porn sites had that functionality for over a decade and one of the world's largest tech companies still can't implement those.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

The search was already so abysmal that this doesn’t change much.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

This sounds like they made a cheap feature from data they already had, but didn't stop to think why anyone would ever want it.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
746 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

55610 readers
2519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS