297
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 119 points 9 months ago

Remember, boomers voted against their own interests for decades. Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 79 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The boomers aren't a monolith. It's millions of people with different experiences and actions throughout their lives.

Did a large number vote/legislate themselves into this problem? Yes. Are millions of others also along for the ride despite not supporting this system? Also, yes.

The issues in this article aren't even applicable to boomers exclusively. Gen-X is a big portion of the population mentioned in the article. This isn't a generational problem, it's a class problem.

And don't forget the fact that if these systemic issues aren't addressed, we'll all face the consequences.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Get out of here with your nuanced take. Where do you think you are?

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 10 points 9 months ago

My friend, this isn't Reddit. We are in the land of the sane. I mean not entirely but to a much larger extent than "big" social media.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

We are in the land of the sane.

Now, hold up...

I mean not entirely

Damn fuckin straight. No one that hangs out in these kinds of places is sane enough to contribute to what's going on out there. The least sane think they do and they'll create 45 comment long unpopulated wastelands proving as much.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

It's kinda hilarious to see "everyone" act as if they're above the exact same shit that happened on Reddit, and yet the vast majority of us were from reddit and absolutely aren't sane.

I mean I've read more about guillotines and communism on lemmy this past year than I ever did in the 11 years I was on reddit.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

act as if they’re above the exact same shit

I know I am, because I usually come posting here when I have temperature and feel bad and have to direct my attention and anxiety somewhere. EDIT: ... so conscious of posting the exact same shit, but above because of knowing it

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Actions have consequences.

Those who were taken along for the ride and actively voted against these are a small minority. I can see some benefit of helping them but would need to see what percentage of them actually need it.

The rest of them fucked around and need to find out or we're just going to keep doing this shit generation after generation. Those on the lower end of the socioeconomic scale have happily voted for regressive policies. Fuck'em.

They already fucked our planet, I owe them nothing. We owe them nothing. They owe us.

Let them eat cat food.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

It's not a small minority. Look at the results of every presidential election since the 1980s, they're not representative of an overwhelming majority of the population. Nor are the republican/democratic splits in Congress.

But that's all besides the point. These generational lines are all arbitrary anyways. We agree there are problems with the status quo--do you think the fixes just shouldn't apply to anyone over 55? Would you be okay with that logic being applied to yourself in 30+ years?

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

those

them

them

them

those

For as long as you continue to think the problem is age and not class (which you are a fool to think that every boomer is upper class or vice-versa), you will contribute nothing to real change. You're playing directly into petty division politics like a good little prolie.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Boomers are the ones voting against working class. Take a look at the 2020 DNC primaries. They elected Joe fucking Biden.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's always they're not a monolith and true enough but if a literal vote doesn't represent the overall will of the group then that's implying thay democracy doesn't work. If most of them voted for this then thats what most of them wanted. We have exit polls and data on this, it's not as if anyone's attributing to a group characteristics that only a few of them have, it's the clear majority, year over year.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The will of the majority shouldn't infringe on the liberty of the minority. Might shouldn't make right.

Are you saying the actions of a portion of an arbitrarily defined group should condemn the group as a whole? I'll ask the same question I asked another commenter; are you okay with that same principle being applied to you in the future?

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's being applied to me now. Every thread talking about millennials political preferences top comment is always 'then they should actually vote' despite the fact that I havent missed an election. The least we can do is keep the same consistency here. Im not here to coddle boomers and treat them in higher regard than how we get treated. You get what you give and the majority of boomers are also getting exactly what they voted for. Must be nice, that's not a luxury my generation has.

Also whos being condemed? Are you suggesting honoring the democratic outcome of a vote of a group is condeming them? If so then who exactly did the condeming? No one says I'm being condemed when I have to live with shit I didn't vote for, the comparison is ridiculous.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

We agree the current "boomer" policies are inadequate and should be changed, yes? Then is your position that improvements to the status quo should exclude people of a certain age because of how a portion of that population has voted?

If that's your position, then that's condemnation. The entire group is being excluded from the solution, despite only a portion having created the problem in the first place.

Apply that logic to any minority/disadvantaged/disenfranchised group, and see where it takes you. Should all Palestinians be punished because they didn't do enough to stop Hamas? Should black Americans born in the 1910s not have enjoyed the benefits of the Civil Rights movement because they didn't affect enough change in their youth?

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

By that logic if you are an adult over 22 years old , you are defacto a MAGA member.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No dude if we can just get rid of the ~~Juden~~ Boomers, all of our problems will be solved because the ~~Juden~~ Boomers are all responsible for every problem in ~~The Reich~~ America.

[-] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you replace a word with another word it sounds shitty, who would've guessed?

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

It's all the same rhetoric. The Jews, the Blacks, the Boomers, the Zoomers, the Christians, the Muslims, etc.

Any comment that blames anything but class as being the only reason for why things are so bad is contributing nothing and hurting actual progress. A 1%er Zoomer does more harm in a single day than a 99th-percentile Boomer does in their lifetime.

[-] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Boomers are not an oppressed minority, literally the fucking opposite, what in the hell are you on about and wtf is wrong with you comparing reasonable hatred for the generation that fucked us all over to antisemitism? Not at all comparable, you're just going to bat for a generation that wants you to pay their social security while trying to get it abolished before you get any

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Holy shit you're still missing the point.

There are boomers who are not wealthy.

The generation didn't fuck you over, the bourgeoisie did, as they always have. The fact that some of the bourgeoisie is made up of baby boomers is purely incidental. You are not being oppressed by Thomas James, 76 year-old local caterer who marched for Civil Rights before you were even born.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

The boomers aren’t a monolith. It’s millions of people with different experiences and actions throughout their live

Millions of them voted for Biden in the primaries. They insist on perpetuating these problems because they're selfish uncompromising pieces of shit.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

So did millions of any other group of people you can think of; white, black, rich, poor, young, and old. Are they all uncompromising pieces of shit too? Is voting for Biden the mark of the beast, and once marked you're never entitled to government reforms?

Or is there some other purity test one must pass before being eligible for support?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Other groups are welcome to vote for whomever they like. Boomers are not. They have caused so much damage and fucked over so many people. They have no business continuing to do so.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago

And because of the ponzi scheme that is social security, future generations will be fucked out of their own retirements.

load more comments (25 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
297 points (94.9% liked)

News

23305 readers
3618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS